ABSTRACT
Purpose
Children progress from making grapheme–phoneme connections to making grapho-syllabic connections before whole-word connections during reading development (Ehri, 2005a). More is known about the development of grapheme–phoneme connections than is known about grapho-syllabic connections. Therefore, we explored the trajectory of syllable use in English developing readers during oral reading.
Method
Fifty-one English-speaking children (mean age: 8.9 years, 55% females, 88% monolinguals) in year groups three, four, and five read aloud sentences with an embedded target word, while their eye movements and voices were recorded. The targets contained six letters and were either one or two syllables.
Result
Children in grade five had shorter gaze duration, shorter articulation duration, and larger spatial eye-voice span (EVS) than children in grade four. Children in grades three and four did not significantly differ on these measures. A syllable number effect was found for gaze duration but not for articulation duration and spatial EVS. Interestingly, one-syllable words took longer to process compared to two-syllable words, suggesting that more syllables may not always signify greater processing difficulty.
Conclusion
Overall, children are sensitive to sublexical reading units; however, due to sample and stimuli limitations, these findings should be interpreted with caution and further research conducted.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository, https://osf.io/p2q45/?view_only=d64833a08f614cd5ad2423597aa725c6.
Ethics approval statement
All procedures in this study involving human participants were approved by Bournemouth University’s Ethics Committee (ID 28325) and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2259522
Notes
1. Year rather than grade is used as the data was collected in the UK. Children in year three would have received three years of formal literacy instruction including reception year.
2. A marginal difference between the two item sets were found, therefore this factor was included in the models if it improved the model fit.
3. The offline measures in were examined in relation to the syllable effect. Only sight word efficiency subtest of the TOWRE led to a significant interaction (see Supplemental file).