3,412
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Ebola

High dose of vesicular stomatitis virus-vectored Ebola virus vaccine causes vesicular disease in swine without horizontal transmission

, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 651-663 | Received 01 Dec 2020, Accepted 09 Mar 2021, Published online: 02 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The recent impact of Ebola virus disease (EVD) on public health in Africa clearly demonstrates the need for a safe and efficacious vaccine to control outbreaks and mitigate its threat to global health. ERVEBO® is an effective recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV)-vectored Ebola virus vaccine (VSV-EBOV) that was approved by the FDA and EMA in late 2019 for use in prevention of EVD. Since the parental virus VSV, which was used to construct VSV-EBOV, is pathogenic for livestock and the vaccine virus may be shed at low levels by vaccinated humans, widespread deployment of the vaccine requires investigation into its infectivity and transmissibility in VSV-susceptible livestock species. We therefore performed a comprehensive clinical analysis of the VSV-EBOV vaccine virus in swine to determine its infectivity and potential for transmission. A high dose of VSV-EBOV resulted in VSV-like clinical signs in swine, with a proportion of pigs developing ulcerative vesicular lesions at the nasal injection site and feet. Uninoculated contact control pigs co-mingled with VSV-EBOV-inoculated pigs did not become infected or display any clinical signs of disease, indicating the vaccine is not readily transmissible to naïve pigs during prolonged close contact. In contrast, virulent wild-type VSV Indiana had a shorter incubation period and was transmitted to contact control pigs. These results indicate that the VSV-EBOV vaccine causes vesicular illness in swine when administered at a high dose. Moreover, the study demonstrates the VSV-EBOV vaccine is not readily transmitted to uninfected pigs, encouraging its safe use as an effective human vaccine.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank Vinay Shivanna, Haixia Li, Michelle Zajac, Tammy Koopman, Chester McDowell, Daniel Madden, Michael Duff, Bonto Faburay, Yonghai Li, and Yuhao Li and the staff of the Kansas State University Biosecurity Research Institute. We also thank Battelle Memorial Institute for execution of RT-qPCR testing for this study.

Disclosure statement

Sheri Dubey, Sean P. Troth, and Beth-Ann Coller are employees of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA and may have shares in the company and/or patents relating to the technology. Richard Nichols reports personal fees from NewLink Genetics and Crozet BioPharma. Thomas P. Monath reports personal fees from NewLink Genetics Corp. and Merck Inc. Thomas P. Monath, Richard Nichols, and Brian K. Martin were associated with Bioprotection Systems, Inc., during the course of the study. Bioprotection Systems, Inc., licensed the VSV-EBOV vaccine from Public Health Canada and sub-licensed the vaccine to Merck & Co., Inc.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by Contract HDTRA-1C-0058-P00002 from the United States Department of Defense (DoD) Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) grant P20GM130448 awarded to the Animal Model/Pathology core of the COBRE Center on Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (CEZID).