161
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Workers’ Acceptance of Digital Procedures: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 59-68 | Received 21 Nov 2022, Accepted 17 Jul 2023, Published online: 20 Aug 2023
 

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS

There are increasing numbers of organizations that are implementing digital procedures (e.g., standard operating procedures). These efforts are often assumed to be a positive development but can be quite costly—both in terms of money and training for a digital rollout. As a result, organizations and practitioners may find themselves at risk for failure when implementing digital procedures. The results of the current study suggest that if workers perceive digital procedures as useful and easy to use, this perception translates into positive attitudes, which subsequently result in fewer deviations. Since acceptance is relatively easy to assess, practitioners can benefit from using these assessments prior to a digital transition/roll-out to both compare competing hardware and software applications, and to initiate and continuously monitor the development of digital procedures. We consider this approach as advantageous to having management develop a system and fully deploying digital procedures without any consideration of worker acceptance.

TECHNICAL ABSTRACT

Background: There is increasing prevalence of digital procedures being introduced in the process safety industries. Presumably, this increase is due to a desire to take advantage of the technology afforded to workers that otherwise is not inherent to traditional paper-based procedures. A critical question that has not been addressed, though, is to what extent do workers accept this new technology in a new digital procedure rollout? Furthermore, does acceptance lead to procedure-related behavior, such as procedure deviations?

Purpose: We used the technology acceptance model (TAM), which includes two dimensions of technology acceptance—perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU)—as the focal antecedent constructs. We hypothesized that these constructs would predict more proximal attitudes toward procedures, which in turn predict procedure deviations.

Method: We used path analyses to test six study hypotheses developed from the TAM. Data were collected from 16 workers at a large, international chemical corporation that worked in logistics. Specific measures obtained were from multi-item, Likert-scale measures of the TAM-PU and PEU dimensions, utility and compliance attitudes toward procedures, and procedure deviation frequency.

Results: Four of the six study hypotheses were supported. TAM-PU and TAM-PEU both significantly predicted (positively) utility attitudes toward procedures (71% variance explained), whereas only TAM-PU significantly predicted (positively) compliance attitudes toward procedures (63% variance explained). In turn, only compliance attitudes significantly predicted (negatively) how frequently workers deviated from procedures (27% variance explained).

Conclusions: These results suggest that workers were generally accepting of the digital procedures and that worker perceptions of perceived usefulness perceptions likely have an indirect effect on procedure deviation frequency. We see this study as a novel contribution to the process safety and procedures research domain. Limitations and future research directions will be discussed.

Acknowledgments

The authors would also like to thank Nilesh Ade, Anjelica Mendoza, Changwon Son, Trent Parker and Stefan Dumlao for their hard work with data collection.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of all of the NGAP members.

Notes

1 We wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for their comments related to this issue.

2 We wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for their comments related to this issue.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the Next Generation Advanced Procedures Consortium, Texas A&M University (https://advancedprocedures.tamu.edu/).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.