503
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Food Science & Technology

Effect of partial replacement of meat with chickpea flour, soybean flour and skimmed milk powder on physicochemical and sensory evaluation properties of camel meat burger

ORCID Icon &
Article: 2321673 | Received 24 Jul 2023, Accepted 16 Feb 2024, Published online: 01 Mar 2024

Figures & data

Table 1. Proximate composition of the camel meat burger replaced with different percentages of CPF, SBF and SMP.

Figure 1. pH values of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Figure 1. pH values of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Table 2. Coluor values of the camel meat burgers incorporated with different percentages of CPF, SBF and SMP.

Figure 2. Water holding capacity (WHC) of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Figure 2. Water holding capacity (WHC) of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Figure 3. Cooking loss values of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Figure 3. Cooking loss values of the camel meat burger incorporated with different percentages of chickpea flour (CPF), soybean flour (SBF), and skimmed milk powder (SMP).

Table 3. Scores of sensory evaluation attributes of the camel meat burger replaced with different percentages of CPF, SBF and SMP.