Organization management strategy for Generation Y performance sustainability

Figures & data

Figure 1. The conceptual framework.

Figure 2. Respecified model of organizational management.

Table A.1. Reliability of HR system.

Variable	Dimensions	Items code	Cronbach’s alpha	Remark
HR system	Appraisal	V23	0.975	Reliable
		V24	0.912
		V25	0.923
	Compensation	V19	0.954	Reliable
		V20	0.925
		V21	0.925
		V22	0.915
	Training and development	V08	0.912	Reliable
		V09	0.939
		V10	0.952
		V11	0.955

Table A.2. Reliability of organisational development.

Variable	Dimensions	Items code	Cronbach’s alpha	Remark
Organisational development	Culture	V12	0.955	Reliable
		V13	0.931
		V14	0.952
		V15	0.972
	Climate	V16	0.951	Reliable
		V17	0.965
		V18	0.943
		V26	0.915

Table A.3. Reliability of performance, engagement, and retention.

Variable	Items code	Cronbach’s alpha	Remark
Performance	V27	0.923	Reliable
	V33	0.971
	V34	0.922
Engagement	V31	0.963	Reliable
	V32	0.925
	V36	0.942
	V37	0.947
Retention	V28	0.961	Reliable
	V29	0.944
	V30	0.922
	V35	0.917

Table A.4. Standardized regressions weight of re-specified model.

No	Variable/dimensions	Std. reg. weight of dimension	Items	Factor Loading	Remark
HR system
1	Appraisal	0.800	V23	0.869	Significant
			V24	0.835
			V25	0.808
2	Compensation	0.826	V19	0.668	Significant
			V20	0.784
			V21	0.617
			V22	0.778
3	Training and development	0.677	V08	0.861	Significant
			V09	0.968
			V10	0.874
			V11	0.958
Organisational development
1	Organizational culture	0.984	V12	0.919	Significant
			V13	0.977
			V14	0.958
			V15	0.927
2	Organizational climate	0.966	V16	0.951	Significant
			V17	0.961
			V18	0.175
			V26	0.451
Endogenous variables
1	Performance	–	V27	0.413	Significant
			V33	0.889
			V34	0.831
2	Engagement	–	V31	0.688	Significant
			V32	0.728
			V36	0.848
			V37	0.755
3	Retention	–	V28	0.740	Significant
			V29	0.603
			V30	0.798
			V35	0.807

Table A.5. Summary of hypothesis testing.

No	Statement	Pathway	P-Value	Results	Remark
Hy.1	HR System confirm measured with Appraisal, Compensation and Training and Development		0.000	Significant	Hy.1 Asserted
Hy.1a	Appraisal confirm as significant dimension of HR system	0.800	0.000	Significant	Hy.1a Asserted
Hy.1b	Compensation confirms as significant dimension of HR system	0.826	0.000	Significant	Hy.1b Asserted
Hy.1c	Training and Development confirm as significant dimension of HR system	0.677	0.000	Significant	Hy.1c Asserted
Hy.2	Organizational Development confirm measured with Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate		0.000	Significant	Hy.2 Asserted
Hy.2a	Organizational Culture confirm as significant dimension of Organizational Development	0.984	0.000	Significant	Hy.2a Asserted
Hy.2b	Organizational Climate confirm as significant measurement of Organizational Development	0.966	0.000	Significant	Hy.2b Asserted
Hy.3a	HR system has a direct positive significant influence on Performance	0.697	0.000	Significant	Hy.3a Asserted
Hy.3b	HR system has a direct positive significant influence on Engagement	0.410	0.000	Significant	Hy.3b Asserted
Hy.3c	HR system has a direct positive significant influence on Performance Retention	0.331	0.000	Significant	Hy.3c Asserted
Hy.4a	Organizational Development has a direct positive significant influence on Performance	0.088	0.000	Non-Significant	Hy.4a Rejected
Hy.4b	Organizational Development has a direct positive significant influence on Engagement	0.312	0.000	Significant	Hy.4b Asserted
Hy.4c	Organizational Development has a direct positive significant influence on Performance Retention	0.253	0.000	Significant	Hy.4c Asserted
Hy.5	HR system, Organizational Development, Performance, Appraisal and Engagement confirm has a significant interaction in the structural model of talent management	Performance (58%) Engagement (44.7%) Retention (29.2%)	0.000	Significant	Hy.5 Asserted