Publication Cover
Anthropological Forum
A journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology
Latest Articles
23
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Fox Fake Tiger: The Chinese Middle-class Mentality toward Community-based Deliberative Democracy Led by Social Organisations

ORCID Icon
Received 02 Nov 2023, Accepted 08 Apr 2024, Published online: 24 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

This study, based on three years of interviews, archival work, and ethnographic fieldwork, explores how social organisations integrate governmental and Party ideologies into the grassroots of urban society, and evaluates the effects of these efforts. Contrary to the widespread belief among the middle class that social organisations simply act as conduits for the will of the government and the Party, this study uncovers a notable absence of official backing for their activities by the state. This apparent contradiction, which might seem baffling at the grassroots level, becomes more comprehensible when examining the function of social organisations. They not only articulate the aims of the government and the Party, thereby addressing a critical void in the existing literature on co-governance, but also shield the state from direct criticism by the middle class. Employing the Chinese proverb ‘Fox Fake Tiger’—which typically denotes a scenario where the fox leverages the tiger’s perceived strength to enhance its influence in a manner it could not achieve on its own, thus critiquing those who depend on the authority of others to garner respect or induce fear—this study illustrates how social organisations, much like the fox that announces the tiger, subtly reinforce the state’s control and credibility within these communities, in line with the ‘whole-process democracy’ campaign. This analogy emphasises the complex role of social organisations in magnifying state authority and legitimacy through delegated power, a dynamic that merits further investigation concerning governmentality and the mentalities of the middle class.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical Approval

This research was conducted following general ethical guidelines in psychology and guided by the Declaration of Helsinki’s standards. This project received full ethical approval from the Science and Technology Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (H2022007I). Informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 338.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.