441
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The entity belief of concentration ability predicts cognitive load, failure-attribution, and flow experience when using a virtual reality device

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 34-51 | Received 22 Nov 2021, Accepted 06 May 2022, Published online: 18 May 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Attentional control theory indicates that concentration is considered an important variable that contributes to learning. There are some devices for players to practice their concentration, but there are few virtual reality (VR) designs which can increase the level of difficulty for students to discipline their mental concentration with incongruent hands-on movement. To address this gap, a VR system named Tracking Fun was designed, which requires hand-eye coordination to move a ball to a target hole. To explore the effect of playing Tracking-fun on players’ concentration performance, the study explored the relationship among entity beliefs of concentration ability (EBCA), intrinsic cognitive load (ICL), failure attribution of VR operation (FAVRO), flow experience, and gameplay performance. Students from a skills-based senior high school took part in this experimental research, and 259 valid questionnaires were returned. The research results showed that: EBCA can positively predict cognitive load; EBCA can positively predict FAVRO; ICL and flow have a negative correlation; FAVRO can negatively predict flow experience when interacting with VR; and flow can negatively predict gameplay performance. Based on the results, enriching the opportunity and difficulty level of Tracking-fun can enhance players’ concentration. Follow-up research suggestions are proposed.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 296.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.