The impact of visual and motor space size on gaze-based target selection

References

• Agustin, J. S., Mateo, J. C., Hansen, J. P., & Villanueva, A. (2009). Evaluation of the potential of gaze input for game interaction. PsychNology Journal, 7(2), 213–17.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, H., Hansen, J. P., & Itoh, K. (2008). Learning to interact with a computer by gaze. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(4), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701760641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R., & Istance, H. (2002, July). Zooming interfaces! Enhancing the performance of eye controlled pointing devices. Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 119–126). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/638249.638272
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieg, H. J., Chuang, L. L., Fleming, R. W., Reiterer, H., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2010, March). Eye and pointer coordination in search and selection tasks. Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 89–92). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743688
   Google Scholar
• Borji, A., Lennartz, A., & Pomplun, M. (2015). What do eyes reveal about the mind?: Algorithmic inference of search targets from fixations. Neurocomputing, 149, 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canare, D., Chaparro, B., & He, J. (2015, August). A comparison of gaze-based and gesture-based input for a point-and-click task. International Conference on Universal Access in Human-computer Interaction (pp. 15–24). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M., Sakamoto, D., & Ono, T. (2020, June). Bubble gaze cursor+ bubble gaze lens: Applying area cursor technique to eye-gaze interface. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379155.3391322
   Google Scholar
• Chun-Yan, K., Zhi-Hao, L., Shao-Yao, Z., Hong-Ting, L., Chun-Hui, W., & Tian, Y. (2020). Influence of target size and distance to target on performance of multiple pointing techniques. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 33(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2020.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., & Brock, P. (2006). Human on-line response to visual and motor target expansion. Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2006, Quebec City, Canada (pp. 81–87). Canadian Information Processing Society.
   Google Scholar
• Delamare, W., Janssoone, T., Coutrix, C., & Nigay, L. (2016, June). Designing 3D gesture guidance: Visual feedback and feedforward design options. Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 152–159). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2909260
   Google Scholar
• Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01537-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002, June). But how, Donald, tell us how? On the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 285–291). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778752
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., Dutoy, C., Andrew, M., Burkitt, J. J., Grierson, L. E., Lyons, J. L., & Bennett, S. J.(2014). The influence of visual feedback and prior knowledge about feedback on vertical aiming strategies. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(6), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.933767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelboim, J., Steinman, R. M., Kowler, E., Edwards, M., Pizlo, Z., Erkelens, C. J., & Collewijn, H. (1995). The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks. Vision Research, 35(23–24), 3401–3422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00080-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Cheng-Zhi, S. M.-W., & Hui, S. (2003). Spatial and temporal characteristic of eye movement in human-computer interface design. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 16(4), 304–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022080713267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillon, M., Leitner, F., & Nigay, L. (2014, May). Static voronoi-based target expansion technique for distant pointing. Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 41–48). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2598178
   Google Scholar
• Guillon, M., Leitner, F., & Nigay, L. (2015). Investigating Visual Feedforward for Target Expansion Techniques. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15 (pp. 2777–2786). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702375
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C. (2002, April). Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 267–274). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503424
   Google Scholar
• Haith, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. (2018). The multiple effects of practice: Skill, habit and reduced cognitive load. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. W., Skovsgaard, H. H., Hansen, J. P., & Møllenbach, E. (2008, March). Noise tolerant selection by gaze-controlled pan and zoom in 3D. Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 205–212). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1344471.1344521
   Google Scholar
• Hardwick, R. M., Forrence, A. D., Krakauer, J. W., & Haith, A. M. (2019). Time-dependent competition between goal-directed and habitual response preparation. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0725-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyrskykari, A., Istance, H., & Vickers, S. (2012, March). Gaze gestures or dwell-based interaction? Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 229–232). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168602
   Google Scholar
• Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, C., Menges, R., Müller, D., & Staab, S. (2017, April). Chromium based framework to include gaze interaction in web browser. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 219–223). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054730
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Paepcke, A., & Winograd, T. (2007, April). Eyepoint: Practical pointing and selection using gaze and keyboard. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 421–430). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240692
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S. (2018). Fitts’ law. In K. L. Norman & J. Kirakowski (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 349–370). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118976005.ch17
   Google Scholar
• McGuffin, M. J., & Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Fitts’ law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(4), 388–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121112.1121115
   Google Scholar
• Miniotas, D., Špakov, O., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2004, April). Eye gaze interaction with expanding targets. CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1255–1258. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986037
   Google Scholar
• Miyoshi, T., & Murata, A. (2001, October). Usability of input device using eye tracker on button size, distance between targets and direction of movement. In 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat. No. 01CH37236) (Vol. 1, pp. 227–232). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2001.969816
   Google Scholar
• Morimoto, C. H., Leyva, J. A. T., & Diaz-Tula, A. (2018). Context switching eye typing using dynamic expanding targets. Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction - COGAIN ’18. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206347
   Google Scholar
• Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peternel, L., Sigaud, O., & Babič, J. (2017). Unifying speed-accuracy trade-off and cost-benefit trade-off in human reaching movements. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvarfordt, P. (2017). Gaze-informed multimodal interaction. The handbook of multimodal-multisensor interfaces: Foundations, user modeling, and common modality combinations-volume 1 (pp. 365–402). https://doi.org/10.1145/3015783.3015794
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, J., Majaranta, P., Kangas, J., Isokoski, P., Akkil, D., Špakov, O., & Raisamo, R. (2020). Gaze interaction with vibrotactile feedback: Review and design guidelines. Human–Computer Interaction, 35(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1306444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenthal, M., Avraham, G., Karniel, A., & Shmuelof, L. (2016). Target size matters: Target errors contribute to the generalization of implicit visuomotor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00830.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, R. D., Noll, D. C., & Thiers, G. (2004). Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. Neuroimage: Reports, 22(4), 1775–1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Sibert, L. E., Templeman, J. N., & Jacob, R. J. (2001). Evaluation and analysis of eye gaze interaction (No. NRL/FR/5513–01-9990). Naval Research Lab
   Google Scholar
• Souto, D., Marsh, O., Hutchinson, C., Judge, S., & Paterson, K. B. (2021). Cognitive plasticity induced by gaze-control technology: Gaze-typing improves performance in the antisaccade task. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špakov, O., & Miniotas, D. (2005, October). Gaze-based selection of standard-size menu items. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 124–128). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1088463.1088486
   Google Scholar
• Squire, P., Mead, P., Smith, M., Coons, R., & Popola, A. (2013). Quick-eye: Examination of human performance characteristics using Eye tracking and manual-based control systems for monitoring multiple displays. Naval Surface Warfare Center.
   Google Scholar
• Stellmach, S., & Dachselt, R. (2013, April). Still looking: Investigating seamless gaze-supported selection, positioning, and manipulation of distant targets. Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 285–294). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470695
   Google Scholar
• Su, X., Au, O. K. C., & Lau, R. W. (2014, April). The implicit fan cursor: A velocity dependent area cursor. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 753–762). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557095
   Google Scholar
• Usuba, H., Yamanaka, S., & Miyashita, H. (2018). Pointing to targets with difference between motor and visual widths. Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp.374–383). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292150
   Google Scholar
• Usuba, H., Yamanaka, S., & Miyashita, H. (2020, December). A model for pointing at targets with different clickable and visual widths and with distractors. 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441019
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, J., Luyten, K., van den Hoven, E., & Coninx, K. (2013, April). Crossing the bridge over Norman’s gulf of execution: Revealing feedforward’s true identity. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1931–1940). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466255
   Google Scholar
• Vertegaal, R. (2008, October). A Fitts law comparison of eye tracking and manual input in the selection of visual targets. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 241–248). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1452392.1452443
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, S., Conversy, S., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Guiard, Y. (2003, April). Human on-line response to target expansion. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 177–184). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642644
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2007). Evaluating eye tracking with ISO 9241-part 9. In Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments: 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22-27, 2007, Proceedings, Part III 12 (pp. 779–788). Springer.
   Google Scholar