Stuck in the Same Old Grades: Unchanging Disparities in Economically Disadvantaged Students’ Course Failures

References

• Alex, P. (2022). Time to pull the plug on traditional Grading? Supporters of mastery-based grading say it could promote equity. Education Next, 22(4), 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Allensworth, E. M., & Clark, K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allensworth, E., & Easton, J. Q. (2013). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools: A close look at course grades, failures, and attendance in the freshman year. University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, C., & Bishop, P. (2012). Middle grades transition programs around the globe. Middle School Journal, 44(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461834
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, A. J. (2019). Report card grades and educational outcomes. In T. Guskey & S. Brookhart (Eds.), What we know about grading: What works, what doesn’t, and what’s next (pp. 32–56). ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brimi, H. M. (2011). Reliability of grading high school work in English. Practical assessment. Research and Evaluation, 16(17), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00182.x
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S., & Guskey, T. R. (2019). What we know about grading: What works, what doesn’t, and what’s next. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common ­educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44668237, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckmiller, T., Townsley, M., & Cooper, R. (2020). Rural high school principals and the challenge of standards-based grading. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 10(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2020.v10n1p92-102
   Google Scholar
• Calarco, J. M., Horn, I., & Chen, G. A. (2020). You need to be more responsible: How math homework operates as a status-reinforcing process in school. Educational Researcher, 51(8), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221111337
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2023). Should 9th grade be separate from high school? Public School Review. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/should-9th-grade-be-separate-from-high-school
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2014). Equitable learning outcomes: Supporting economically and culturally disadvantaged students in ‘formative learning environments. Improving Schools, 17(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213519182
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal inference: The mixtape. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., van den Bergh, L., & Bijlstra, G. (2022). Implicit measures of teachers’ attitudes and stereotypes, and their effects on teacher practice and student outcomes: A review. Learning and Instruction, 78, 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of ­responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, J. Q., Johnson, E., & Sartain, L. (2017). The predictive power of ninth-grade GPA. University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. The American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt, A. D., Hoffman, A. J., & Schacter, H. L. (2022). On shaky grounds: Peer victimization predicts friendship instability across the ninth grade school year. Journal of Adolescence,)94(7), 1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2019). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2004). Are zeroes your ultimate weapon? Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 70(3), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2013). The case against percentage grades. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 68–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2020). Get set, go: Creating successful grading and reporting systems. Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski, P. (2013). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap. Teachings College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R., & Townsley, M. (2022). Including homework and employability skills in class grades: An investigation of equitable grading outcomes in an urban high school. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 27(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.7275/pare.1327
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2009). Grading policies that work against standards…and how to fix them. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading (pp. 9–26). Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2015). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2022). Can grades be an effective form of feedback? Phi Delta Kappan, 104(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221136597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Jung, L. A. (2009). Grading and reporting in a standards-based environment: Implications for students with special needs. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R. N., & Linden, L. L. (2012). Discrimination in grading. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(4), 146–168. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23358248, https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.4.146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harðardóttir, A. K., Guðjónsson, S., Minelgaite, I., & Kristinsson, K. (2019). Ethics as usual? Gender differences in work ethic and grades. Management, 24(2), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.24.2.2
   Google Scholar
• Huntington-Klein, N. (2021). The effect: An introduction to research design and causality. Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003226055
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2008). What types of students’ effort are rewarded with high marks? Sociology of Education, 81(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, M., & Cooper, R. (2019). Taking on a new grading system: The interconnected effects of standards based grading on teaching, learning, assessment, and student behavior. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636519826709
   Google Scholar
• Kopotic, K. (2020). From start to finish: Predicting enrollment and attainment in Arkansas postsecondary education [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. ScholarWorks@UARK. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/3679
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. V. (2017, August 17). What kind of change leads to learning for all? Solution Tree. https://www.solutiontree.com/blog/second-order-change/
   Google Scholar
• Kunnath, J. P. (2017). Teacher grading decisions: Influences, rationale, and practices. American Secondary Education, 45(3), 68–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45147907?sid=primo
   Google Scholar
• Kunnath, J. P., & Suleiman, M. (2018). Examining the role of poverty in teacher grading decisions. Journal for Leadership, Equity, and Research, 4(2), 1–22. https://journals.sfu.ca/cvj/index.php/cvj/article/view/43
   Google Scholar
• Ledlow, N. A. (2022). Equity in grading: Teachers’ grading practices and beliefs towards student-teacher responsibility in the classroom (Order No. 28970745) [ProQuest Dissertations Publishing]. Western Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Link, L. J., & Guskey, T. R. (2022). Is standards-based grading effective? Theory into Practice, 61(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. (2017). The impact of minimum grading: A case study in one southern Nevada high school [Doctoral dissertation]. Pro Quest LLC. (Accession No. 10622936).
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2006). Social support as a buffer in the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(4), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malespina, A., & Singh, C. (2022). Gender differences in grades versus grade penalties: Are grade anomalies more detrimental for female physics majors? Physics Education Research, 18(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2016). Stability of children’s and adolescent’s friendships: A meta analytic ­review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 62(3), 252–284. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.3.0252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, K. H., Atagana, H. I., & Edawoke, Y. (2014). The difference between male and female students’ self-efficacy, academic engagement and academic achievement in biology among grade ten students in South Wollo Zone Schools in Ethiopia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 804–813. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p804
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. R., & McKenzie, S. C. (2022). Arkansas high school freshmen course failures. Office for Education Policy, 19(2), 1–24. https://oep.uark.edu/arkansas-high-school-freshmen-course-failures-2/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. R., & McKenzie, S. C. (2023). A glimpse into Arkansas teachers’ grading practices. The Office for Education Policy, 20(3), 1–39. https://oep.uark.edu/a-glimpse-into-arkansas-teachers-grading-practices/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. R., McKenzie, S. C., & Reid, C. (2021). Examining Arkansas’ freshman GPAs and long term outcomes. The Office for Education Policy, 18(12), 1–36. https://oep.uark.edu/examining-arkansas-freshman-gpas-and-long-term-outcomes/
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, M. A., & Guskey, T. R. (2015). Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715579043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neild, R. C., Stoner-Eby, S., & Furstenberg, F. (2008). Connecting entrance and departure: The transition to ninth grade and high school dropout. Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 543–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124508316438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). (2017). Washington state graduation rates continue to rise; OSPI releases new graduation data. OSPI. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.k12.wa.us/about-ospi/press-releases/washington-stategraduation-rates-continue-rise-ospi-releases-new-graduation-data
   Google Scholar
• Ozili, P. K. (2022). The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4128165
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C., Webb, D. J., Chessey, M. K., & Lucas, J. (2018). Pondering zeros: Uncovering hidden inequities within a decade of grades. In Ithaca Working Paper Series: 2331–8422. Cornell University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E. K. (2019). The make-or-break year: Solving the dropout crisis one ninth grader at a time. New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, D. B. (2008). Effective grading practices. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, D., Jung, L. A., & O’Connor, K. (2017). What’s worth fighting against in grading? Educational Leadership, 74(8), 42–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Hutt, E. (2013). Making the grade: A history of the A-F marking scheme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.790480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & Hutt, E. (2023). Off the mark: How grades, ratings, and rankings undermine learning (but don’t have to). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seeskin, A., Nagaoka, J., & Mahaffie, S. (2018). Hidden risk: Changes in GPA across the transition to high school. University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, D., & Murphy, S. (1992). Graded or degraded: Perceptions of letter-grading for mainstreamed learning-disabled students. British Columbia of Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tobisch, A., & Dresel, M. (2017). Negatively or positively biased? Dependencies of teachers’ judgments and expectations based on students’ ethnic and social backgrounds. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9392-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsley, M., & Buckmiller, T. (2020). Losing As and Fs: What works for schools implementing standards-based grading? Educational Considerations, 46(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2204
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T.-L., & Tseng, Y.-K. (2015). Do thinking styles matter for science achievement and attitudes toward science class in male and female elementary school students in Taiwan? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9503-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormeli, R. (2011). Redos and retakes done right. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 22–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. S., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2011). Primary and secondary students’ motivation in learning English: Grade and gender differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar