Publication Cover
Inquiry
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Latest Articles
349
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impossibilities without impossibilia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 29 Jan 2024, Accepted 27 Feb 2024, Published online: 22 Mar 2024

References

  • Bird, A. 2005. “The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws.” Foundations of Science 10: 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-5259-9.
  • Bueno, O., and E. Zalta. 2017. “Object Theory and Modal Meinongianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95: 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1260609.
  • Duží, M. 2009. “Strawsonian vs. Russellian Definite Descriptions.” Organon F 16: 587–614.
  • Duží, M. 2014. “How to Unify Russellian and Strawsonian Definite Descriptions.” In Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic 41, edited by R. Ciuni, H. Wansing, and C. Willkommen, 85–101. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4.
  • Duží, M. 2019. “If Structured Propositions are Logical Procedures, Then How Are Procedures Individuated?” Synthese 196: 1249–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1595-5.
  • Duží, M., and M. Fait. 2021. “A Hyperintensional Theory of Intelligent Question Answering in TIL.” In Natural Language Processing in Artificial Intelligence - NLPinAI 2020, Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI), volume 939, edited by R. Loukanova, 69–104. Springer Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63787-3.
  • Duží, M., B. Jespersen, M. Kosterec, and D. Vacek. 2023. Transparent Intensional Logic. Selected Recent Essays, Studies in Logic 95. London: College Publications.
  • Duží, M., B. Jespersen, and P. Materna. 2010. Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hicks, M. T. 2022. “Counterparts and Counterpossibles: Impossibility Without Impossible Worlds.” The Journal of Philosophy 119: 542–574. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20221191035.
  • Jago, M. 2015. “Impossible Worlds.” Nous 49: 713–728.
  • Jespersen, B., and M. Duží. 2022. “Transparent Quantification Into Hyperpropositional Attitudes de Dicto.” Linguistics and Philosophy 45: 1119–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-021-09344-9.
  • Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • MacPherson, B. 1993. “Is it Possible That Belief Isn’t Necessary?” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34: 12–28.
  • Meinong, A. 1960. “On the Theory of Objects‘.” In Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, edited by R. Chisholm, 76–117. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Org. 1904.
  • Priest, G. 1997. “Sylvan’s Box.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38: 573–582.
  • Priest, G. 2005. Toward Non-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Priest, G., N. Fujikawa, F. Casati, and F. Berto. 2020. “Modal Meinongianism and Object Theory.” The Australasian Journal of Logic 17: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v17i1.4814.
  • Ripley, D. 2012. “Structures and Circumstances: Two Ways to Fine-Grain Propositions.” Synthese 189: 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0100-4.
  • Simchen, O. 2004. “On the Impossibility of Nonactual Epistemic Possibilities.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 527–554. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2004101105.
  • Tichý, P. 1988. On the Foundations of Frege’s Logic. Berlin: deGruyter.
  • Tichý, P. 2004. Collected Papers in Logic and Philosophy, edited by V. Svoboda, B. Jespersen and C. Cheyne. Prague: Filosofia, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Dunedin: University of Otago Press.