Counterpossibles, consequence and context

References

• Bennett, J. 2003. A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. 2016. “Omission Impossible.” Philosophical Studies 173 (10): 2575–2589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0672-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto, F., R. French, G. Priest, and D. Ripley. 2018. “Williamson on Counterpossibles.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4): 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9446-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., and G. Priest. 2004. “Chunk and Permeate, A Paraconsistent Inference Strategy. Part I: The Infinitesimal Calculus.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4): 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LOGI.0000036831.48866.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. 1946. “The Contrary to Fact Conditional.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 60 (219): 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LV.219.289.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. H. 1976. On Numbers and Games. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, N., and C. Hill. 2017. “Impossible Worlds and Metaphysical Explanation: Comments on Kment's Modality and Explanatory Reasoning.” Analysis 77 (1): 134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, C. 2021. “The Deduction Theorem (Before and After Herbrand).” History and Philosophy of Logic 42 (2): 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2021.1889117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles, A. S. 2007. “Counterfactual Scorekeeping.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3): 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9018-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, Harold. 1931. Scientific Inference. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, C. S., and D. Nolan. 2012. “Disposition Impossible.” Noûs 46: 732–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny, Matthias. 2018. “Counterpossibles in Science: The Case of Relative Computability.” Noûs 52 (3): 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. G., and D. Tall. 2012. “The Tension Between Intuitive Infinitesimals and Formal Mathematical Analysis.” In Crossroads in the History of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, edited by B. in Sririman, 71–89. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kocurek, A. 2021. “Counterpossibles.” Philosophy Compass 16 (11): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. 2012. Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. I., and C. H. Langford. 1932. Symbolic Logic. 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1979. “Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow.” Noûs 13 (4): 455–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycan, W. 2001. Real Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, V. 1985. “A Counterexample to Modus Ponens.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (9): 462–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, C. 1990. “Models for Inconsistent and Incomplete Differential Calculus.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (2): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093635421.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. 2012. “On the Pragmatics of Counterfactuals.” Noûs 46 (3): 561–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00798.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, D. 1997. “Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach.” Notre Dame Journal for Formal Logic 38 (4): 535–572.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, D. 2003. “Defending a Possible Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals.” Philosophical Studies 116 (3): 215–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, D. 2016. “Conditionals and Curry.” Philosophical Studies 173 (10): 2629–2647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. 1968. “A Theory of Conditionals.” In Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, no.2, edited by N. Rescher, 98–112. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. 1990. “Inconsistencies in Learning Calculus.” Focus 12 (3&4): 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Laan, D. 2004. “Counterpossibles and Similarity.” In Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis, edited by F. C. Jackson and G. Priest, 258–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, M. 2017. “Lessons from Sobel Sequences.” Semantics and Pragmatics 10 (4): 1–57. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.4.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2020. Suppose and Tell: The Semantics and Heuristics of Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar