A unificationist approach to wrongful pure risking

Bibliography

• Audi, P. 2012. “Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-of Relation.” Journal of Philosophy 109 (12): 685–711. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20121091232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berker, S. 2017. “The Unity of Grounding.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 127 (507): 729–777. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berker, S. 2019. “The Explanatory Ambitions of Moral Principles.” Noûs, https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. 2022. “Robust Rights and Harmless Wronging.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics Volume 12, edited by Mark Timmons, 31–53. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burri, S. 2022. “Conceptualising Morally Permissible Risk Imposition without Quantified Individual Risks.” Synthese 200 (415). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03888-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cripps, E. 2013. Climate Change And The Moral Agent, 27–57. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, M. 2016. “Risk Imposition and Freedom.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 15 (3): 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X15605437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, K. 2012. “Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Fabrice Correia, and Benjamin Schnieder, 37–80. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, C. 2003. “Is Risk a Harm?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (3): 963–1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogal, D., and O. Risberg. 2020. “The Metaphysics of Moral Explanations.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 15, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 170–194. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, J. 2015. “Contractualism and Social Risk.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (3): 175–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, B. 2012. “The Limits of Non-Consequentialist Approach to Tort.” Legal Theory 18 (3): 231–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325212000183.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, B. 2020. Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frowe, H. 2021. “Risk Imposition and Liability to Defensive Harm.” Criminal Law & Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09588-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanser, M. 2014. “Acting Wrongly by Trying.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics Volume 4, edited by M. Timmons, 138–158. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayenhjelm, M., and J. Wolff. 2011. “The Moral Problem of Risk Impositions: A Survey of the Literature.” European Journal of Philosophy 20: E26–E51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. 2012. “Contratualism's (Not So) Slippery Slope.” Legal Theory 18 (3): 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135232521200002X.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. 2016. “The Distinctive Significance of Systemic Risk.” Ratio Juris 30 (3): 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12150.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. 1991. The Limits of Morality. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. 2003. “Who Can Be Wronged?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00099.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. 2015. “Risking and Wrong.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1): 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, D. P. 1986. “Taking Risk Seriously.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (11): 633–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S. M. 2012. “Intentions and Moral Permissibility: The Case of Acting Permissibly with Bad Intentions.” Law and Philosophy 31 (6): 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9134-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, K., and S. Nyholm. 2022. “Dominating Risk Impositions.” Journal of Ethics 26 (4): 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-022-09407-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy, D. 1997. “Rights, Explanation, and Risks.” Ethics 107 (2): 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/233718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., and K. Bennett. 2021. “Supervenience.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/supervenience/.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdiek, J. 2009. “Towards a Right Against Risking.” Law and Philosophy 28 (4): 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-008-9039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdiek, J. 2012. “The Moral Significance of Risking.” Legal Theory 18 (3): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325212000018
   Google Scholar
• Oberdiek, J. 2017. “Imposing Risk: A Normative Framework.” In Oxford Legal Philosophy. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, T., and A. Slavny. 2019. “What’s Wrong with Risk?” Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (2): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.407
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. 2003. “Harm, History and Counterfactuals.” San Diego Law Review 40 (4): 1283–1313.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. 2007. “Risk, Harms, Interests, and Rights.” In Risk: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by T. Lewens, 190–201. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. 2014. “Torts, rights, and risk.” In Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by J. Oberdiek, 38–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M., and Seidel S. 2021. “The Deontic Transfer Principle.” Erkenntnis 86 (5): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00149-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Placani, A. 2016. “When the Risk of Harm Harms.” Law and Philosophy 36 (1): 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-016-9277-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong, J. 2020. The Morality of Defensive Force. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, P. 1986. “Moral realism.” The Philosophical Review 95 (2): 163–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, M. 2012. “In Defence of Ground.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4): 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2011.616900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, edited by R. Hale, and A. Hoffman, 109–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, T. 2022. “Can a Risk of Harm Itself be a Harm?” Analysis 81 (4): 694–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anab033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. 2009. On What Grounds What. In Chalmers & Wasserman Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, 347–383. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, N. 1984. “Moral Explanations.” In Morality, Reason, and Truth, edited by David Copp, and David Zimmerman, 49–78. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Suikkanen, J. 2019. “Ex Ante and Ex Post Contractualism: A Synthesis.” The Journal of Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-019-09282-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tadros, Victor. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. 1986. Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Väyrynen, P. 2013. “I – Grounding and Normative Explanation.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1): 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2013.00224.x.
   Google Scholar
• Väyrynen, P. 2018. “Reasons and Moral Principles.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by D. Star, 839–862. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., and A. De-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar