The rational roles of experiences of utterance meanings

References

• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. 2nd ed, edited by J. O. Urmson, and M. Sbisá. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azzouni, J. 2013. Semantic Perception: How the Illusion of a Common Language Arises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balcerak Jackson, B. 2019. “Against the Perceptual Model of Utterance Comprehension.” Philosophical Studies 176 (2): 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-1021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcerak Jackson, B. Forthcoming. “Inferential Practical Knowledge of Meaning.” Inquiry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, T. 2009. “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengson, J., and M. Moffett. 2007. “Know-How and Concept Possession.” Philosophical Studies 136 (1): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9146-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonJour, L. 1980. “Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00396.x
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. 2006. “Now You Know Who Hong Oak Yun Is.” Philosophical Issues 16: 24–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2009. “What Mary did Yesterday: Reflections on Knowledge-wh.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2): 439–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2011. “Knowledge-How: A Unified Account.” In Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action, edited by J. Bengson, and M. A. Moffett, 136–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2013. “Phenomenal Seemings and Sensible Dogmatism.” In Seemings and Justification, edited by C. Tucker, 270–289. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2018a. “In Defense of Hearing Meanings.” Synthese 195 (7): 2967–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1178-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2018b. “Phenomenal Dogmatism, Seeming Evidentialism and Inferential Justification.” In Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism, edited by K. McCain, 53–70. San Francisco, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2018c. Seeing and Saying. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2020. “Seeing and Hearing Meanings. A Non-Inferential Approach to Utterance Comprehension.” In Inference and Consciousness, edited by A. Nes with T. Chan, 99–124. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2021. “Dogmatism and Ampliative Inference.” Veritas 66 (1): e42186. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2021.1.42186
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B., and D. E. Gatzia. 2024. “Dogmatism, Seemings, and Non-Deductive Inferential Justification.” In Seemings: New Arguments, New Angles, edited by K. McCain, S. Stapleford, and M. Steup, 111–129. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. In Press. “The Rational Roles of Experience.” In Reformed Empiricism and its Prospects., edited by Raja Rosenhagen. San Francisco, CA: Springer..
   Google Scholar
• Buchtel, H. A., and J. D. Stewart. 1989. “Auditory Agnosia: Apperceptive or Associative Disorder?” Brain and Language 37 (1): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90098-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., and T. Habekost. 2008. Principles of Visual Attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. 1982. “Knowledge and Understanding.” Philosophical Quarterly 32 (126): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 1979. “The Logic of Knowing How and Ability.” Mind 88 (1): 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXXVIII.1.394
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A., and D. Pritchard. 2013. “Knowledge-How and Epistemic Luck.” Noûs 49 (3): 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cath, Y. 2011. “Knowing How without Knowing That.” In Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action, edited by J. Bengson, and M. A. Moffett, 113–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cath, Y. 2015. “Revisionary Intellectualism and Gettier.” Philosophical Studies 172 (1): 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0263-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. M. 1966. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2012. “Presentational Phenomenology.” In Consciousness and Subjectivity, edited by S. Miguens, and G. Preyer, 51–72. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2013. Intuition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2014a. “The Rational Roles of Intuition.” In Intuitions, edited by A. R. Booth, and D. P. Rowbottom, 9–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2014b. Review of Tucker (eds.) Seemings and Justification. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2018. “Epistemic Elitism and Other Minds.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (2): 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. 2020. “Squaring Pragmatism with Linguistic Meaning.” In Linguistic Pragmatism and Weather Reporting, 41–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 1989. “Tacit Knowledge and Subdoxastic States.” In Reflections on Chomsky, edited by A. George, 131–152. Cambridge: Mass: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. 1969. Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, J. 2014. “Realism and Anti-realism about Experiences of Understanding.” Philosophical Studies 168 (3): 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0155-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drożdżowicz, A. 2021a. “Bringing Back the Voice: On the Auditory Objects of Speech Perception.” Synthese 199: 661–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drożdżowicz, A. 2021b. “Experiences of Linguistic Understanding as Epistemic Feelings.” Mind and Language 38 (1): 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drożdżowicz, A. 2023. “Do We Hear Meanings? Between Perception and Cognition.” Inquiry 66 (2): 196–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1612774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1993. “What do I Know when I Know a Language?” In The Seas of Language, 94–105. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What is Said.” In Epistemology of Language, edited by A. Barber, 325–366. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuqua, F. 2017. “Dogmatism Without Mooreanism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/44982134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparri, L., and M. Murez. 2019. “Hearing Meanings: The Revenge of Context.” Synthese 198 (6): 5229–5252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02398-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghijsen, H. 2014. “Phenomenalist Dogmatist Experientialism and the Distinctiveness Problem.” Synthese 191 (7): 1549–1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0348-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghijsen, H. 2015. “Grounding Perceptual Dogmatism: What Are Perceptual Seemings?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (2): 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodniewicz, J. P. 2020. “The Process of Linguistic Understanding.” Synthese 198 (12): 11463–11481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02807-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodniewicz, J. P. 2022. “The Justification of Comprehension-Based Beliefs.” Rev of Phil and Psych 13 (1): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00575-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, S. 2010. “Knowledge of Meaning, Conscious and Unconscious.” In The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, edited by A. Brad, P. Douglas, and W. James, 5, 1–44. Manhattan, KS: New Prairie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habgood-Coote, J. 2018. “Knowledge-How is the Norm of Intention.” Philosophical Studies 175 (7): 1703–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0931-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. G. 1995. “The Sense of Communication.” Mind 104: 76–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. 1992. “Truth and Understanding.” Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. 1996. “The Semantics of Questions.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, edited by S. Lappin, 361–383. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2001. Skepticism and The Veil of Perception. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 1989. “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, H. Wettstein, and J. Perry, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1982. “Whether Report.” In Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Lennart A˚ qvist on his Fiftieth Birthday, edited by T. Pauli, et al., 194–206. Uppsala: Filosofiska Studier.
   Google Scholar
• Longworth, G. 2008. “Linguistic Understanding and Knowledge.” Noûs 42 (1): 50–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longworth, G. 2009. “Some Models of Linguistic Understanding.” Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5. https://doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.284
   Google Scholar
• Longworth, G. 2018. “Understanding What Was Said.” Synthese 195 (2): 815–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1243-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, L. 2015. “In Defense of Dogmatism.” Philosophical Studies 172 (1): 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0293-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nes, A. 2016. “On What We Experience When We Hear People Speak.” Phenomenology and Mind 10: 58–85.
   Google Scholar
• O'Callaghan, C. 2011. “Against Hearing Meanings.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245): 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.704.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Callaghan, C. 2015. “Speech Perception.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception, edited by M. Matthen, 475–494. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, M. 2017. “Experiences, Seemings, and Perceptual Justification.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2): 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1202991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, D. 2002. “Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language.” Mind 111 (443): 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, D. 2010. “On the Epistemology and Psychology of Speech Comprehension.” The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5: Meaning, understanding and knowledge, 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J., and J. Cruz. 1999. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd ed. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2000. “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.” Noûs 34 (4): 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2004. “What’s Wrong with Moore’s Argument?” Philosophical Issue 14 (1): 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2012. “When Warrant Transmits.” In Wittgenstein, Epistemology and Mind: Themes from the Philosophy of Crispin Wright, edited by A. Coliva, 269–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2013. “Problems for Credulism.” In Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism, edited by C. Tucker, 89–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiland, I. 2015. “On Experiencing Meanings.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (4): 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., and G. W. Humphreys. 2003. “Visual Agnosia.” Neurologic Clinic 21 (2): 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(02)00095-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1945. “Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. Vol. 46, 1–16. ..
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. 2006. “Which Properties are Represented in Perception.” In Perceptual Experience, edited by T. S. Gendler, and J. Hawthorne, 481–503. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. 2010. The Contents of Visual Experience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silins, N. 2008. “Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic.” Oxford Studies in Epistemology 2: 108–140.
   Google Scholar
• Silins, N. 2013. “The Significance of High-Level Content.” Philosophical Studies 162 (1): 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9991-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon, P. 2003. “Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.t01-1-00001
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, E. 2021. Epistemic Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2005. “Hornsby on the Phenomenology of Speech.” The Aristotelian Society 79 (1): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-7013.2005.00129.x
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., and T. Williamson. 2001. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, G. 2009. Mental Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. 2010a. “Why Open-Minded People Should Endorse Dogmatism.” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. 2010b. “When Transmission Fails.” Philosophical Review 119: 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2010-012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turri, J. 2010. “On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2): 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar