Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. Understanding the Links Between Pronatalism and Voluntary Childlessness

References

• Albertini, M. and E. Brini. 2021. “I’ve Changed my Mind. The Intentions to Be Childless, Their Stability and Realisation.” European Societies 23(1):119–60. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1764997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A. 2008. “The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.” American Sociological Review 73(1):37–59. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begall, K. and M. Mills. 2011. “The Impact of Subjective Work Control, Job Strain and Work–Family Conflict on Fertility Intentions: A European Comparison.” European Journal of Population 27(4):433–56. doi: 10.1007/s10680-011-9244-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, A. 2011. “Articulated Antipathies: Political Influence on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 52(6):457–77. doi: 10.1177/0020715211428182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, A. and M. Hjerm. 2014. “How the Religious Context Affects the Relationship between Religiosity and Attitudes towards Immigration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37(6):937–57. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2012.748210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaille, C. and J. Marshall. 2019. “Education and Anti-Immigration Attitudes: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms across Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 113(1):254–63. doi: 10.1017/S0003055418000588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceobanu, A. M., and T. Koropeckyj-Cox. 2013. “Should International Migration Be Encouraged to Offset Population Aging? A Cross-Country Analysis of Public Attitudes in Europe.” Population Research and Policy Review 32(2):261–84. doi: 10.1007/s11113-012-9260-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. 2002. “Replacement Migration, or Why Everyone is Going to Have to Livein Korea: A Fable for Our Times from the United Nations.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 357(1420):583–98. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. 2006. “Immigration and Ethnic Change in Low-Fertility Countries: A Third Demographic Transition.” Population and Development Review 32(3):401–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00131.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. 2009. “Divergent Patterns in the Ethnic Transformation of Societies.” Population and Development Review 35(3):449–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00293.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton, M. J. and A. A. Jamal. 2022. “An Overstated Welcome: Brexit and Intentionally Masked anti-Immigrant Sentiment in the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(5):1051–71. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1791692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czymara, C. S. 2020. “Propagated Preferences? Political Elite Discourses and Europeans’ Openness toward Muslim Immigrants.” International Migration Review 54(4):1212–37. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2099851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, E. and B. Meuleman. 2012. “Explaining Attitudes towards Immigration Policies in European Countries: The Role of Human Values.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(5):757–75. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.667985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S., D. Marre, and M. Smietana. 2022. “Demographic Anxieties in the Age of ‘Fertility Decline’.” Medical Anthropology 41(6–7):591–9. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2099851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dražanová, L. 2022. “Sometimes It is the Little Things: A Meta-Analysis of Individual and Contextual Determinants of Attitudes toward Immigration (2009–2019).” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 87:85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C. and I. Preston. 2000. Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration. Discussion Paper No. 190. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.251991.
   Google Scholar
• Duvander, A. Z., T. Lappegård, and G. Andersson. 2010. “Family Policy and Fertility: Fathers’ and Mothers’ Use of Parental Leave and Continued Childbearing in Norway and Sweden.” Journal of European Social Policy 20(1):45–57. doi: 10.1177/0958928709352541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, T., S. Gietel-Basten, L. Abolina, L. Abuladze, S. Aksyonova, A. Akrap, and P. Zvidrins. 2016. “Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe after.” Comparative Population Studies 41(1):3–56. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2016-03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, A. and S. Pardos-Prado. 2014. “The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Immigrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40(1):79–99. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.826131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietel-Basten, S., A. Rotkirch, and T. Sobotka. 2022. “Changing the Perspective on Low Birth Rates: Why Simplistic Solutions Won’t Work.” BMJ 379:e072670. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glas, S. 2023. “What Gender Values Do Muslims Resist? How Religiosity and Acculturation over Time Shape Muslims’ Public-Sphere Equality, Family Role Divisions, and Sexual Liberalization Values Differently.” Social Forces 101(3):1199–229. doi: 10.1093/sf/soac004.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodzeisky, A. and M. Semyonov. 2016. “Not Only Competitive Threat but Also Racial Prejudice: Sources of Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in European Societies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(3):331–54. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J. and M., J. Hiscox. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization 61(02):399–442. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, R. 2019. “Childfree by Choice.” Studies in Gender and Sexuality 20(1):22–35. doi: 10.1080/15240657.2019.1559515.
   Google Scholar
• Hašková, H. and R. Dudová. 2020. “Selective pronatalism in childcare and reproductive health policies in Czechoslovakia.” The History of the Family 25(4):627–648. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2020.1737561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hašková, H. and R. Dudová. 2021. “Children of the State? The Role of Pronatalism in the Development of Czech Childcare and Reproductive Health Policies.” Pp. 181–98 in Intimacy and Mobility in an Era of Hardening Borders, edited by H. Haukanes and F. Pine. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2006. “A Primer on Multilevel Modeling.” Human Communication Research 32(4):385–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A., E. Davidov, R. Ford, E. G. Green, A. Ramos, and P. Schmidt. 2020. “Contested Terrain: Explaining Divergent Patterns of Public Opinion towards Immigration within Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(3):475–88. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1550145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. F. and L. Richards. 2020. “Contested Boundaries: Consensus and Dissensus in European Attitudes to Immigration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (3):489–511. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T. and A. Sinno. 2017. “Different Groups, Different Threats: Public Attitudes towards Immigrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(3):339–58. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1202749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjerm, M. 2007. “Do Numbers Really Count? Group Threat Theory Revisited.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(8):1253–75. doi: 10.1080/13691830701614056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhn, C. 1988. “Population Policies in Advanced Societies: Pronatalist and Migration Strategies.” European Journal of Population 3(3–4):459–81. doi: 10.1007/BF01796909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., M. Moerbeek, and R. Van De Schoort. 2017. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315650982.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., I. Michalowski, and S. Waibel. 2012. “Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008.” AJS; American Journal of Sociology 117(4):1202–45. doi: 10.1086/662707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koropeckyj-Cox, T. and G. Pendell. 2007. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes about Childlessness in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and Family 69(4):899–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzeva, T., and E. Dimitrova. 2014. “Nationalism and Declining Population in Bulgaria after.” Comparative Population Studies 39(4):1990. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2014-15.
   Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M. and D. Konietzka. 2017. “Analyzing Childlessness,” in Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences, edited by M. Kreyenfeld and D. Konietzka. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Kunovich, R. M. 2004. “Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differences in Regression Slopes.” Social Science Research 33(1):20–44. doi: 10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00037-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., G. Amran, A. Belanger, A. Conte, N. Gailey, D. Ghio, E. Grapsa, K. Jensen, and M. Stonawski. 2019. Demographic Scenarios for the EU: Migration, Population and Education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/590301.
   Google Scholar
• Lyck-Bowen, M., and M. Owen. 2019. “A Multi-Religious Response to the Migrant Crisis in Europe: A Preliminary Examination of Potential Benefits of Multi-Religious Cooperation on the Integration of Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45(1):21–41. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1437344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markaki, Y., and S. Longhi. 2013. “What Determines Attitudes to Immigration in European Countries? An Analysis at the Regional Level.” Migration Studies 1(3):311–37. doi: 10.1093/migration/mnt015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marois, G., A. Bélanger, and W. Lutz. 2020. “Population Aging, Migration, and Productivity in Europe.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(14):7690–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918988117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. F. 2015. “Population Policies in Europe.” L'Europe en Formation 377(3):136–50. doi: 10.3917/eufor.377.0136.
   Google Scholar
• Mccutcheon, J. M. 2020. “Reviewing Pronatalism: A Summary and Critical Analysis of Prior Research Examining Attitudes towards Women without Children.” Journal of Family Studies 26(4):489–510. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2018.1426033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melegh, A. 2016. “Unequal Exchanges and the Radicalization of Demographic Nationalism in Hungary.” Intersections 2(4):87–108. doi: 10.17356/ieejsp.v2i4.287.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, E.-M. and A. C. Liefbroer. 2012. “The Attitude toward Voluntary Childlessness in Europe: Cultural and Institutional Explanations.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3):587–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, B., K. Abts, P. Schmidt, T. F. Pettigrew, and E. Davidov. 2020. “Economic Conditions, Group Relative Deprivation and Ethnic Threat Perceptions: A Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(3):593–611. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. 2021. “Social Trust and anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: A Longitudinal Multi-Level Analysis.” Frontiers in Sociology 6:604884. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.604884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan, S. P. 2003. “Is Low Fertility a Twenty-First-Century Demographic Crisis?” Demography 40(4):589–603. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthuta, M. and P. Laoswatchaikul. 2022. “The Patterns of Family Policy to Enhance Fertility: The Comparative Analysis.” Social Space 22(1):286–304.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Labour Market Transitions across OECD Countries: Stylised Facts. Working Papers No. 1692.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, K. H. and R. Sinnott. 2006. “The Determinants of Individual Attitudes towards Immigration.” European Journal of Political Economy 22 (4):838–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Pető, A., J. Goetz, S. Höft, and L. Oláh. 2022. Discourses on Demography in the EU Institutions. Brussels, Belgium: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Pottie‐Sherman, Y. and R. Wilkes. 2017. “Does Size Really Matter? On the Relationship between Immigrant Group Size and anti‐Immigrant Prejudice.” International Migration Review 51(1):218–50. doi: 10.1111/imre.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillian, L. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review 60(4):586–611. doi: 10.2307/2096296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijken, A. J. and E.-M. Merz. 2014. “Double Standards: Differences in Norms on Voluntary Childlessness for Men and Women.” European Sociological Review 30(4):470–82. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcu051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saczuk, K. 2013. “Development and Critique of the Concept of Replacement Migration,” in International Migration and the Future of Populations and Labour in Europe. Dodrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8948-9_13.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepers, P., M. Gijsberts, and M. Coenders. 2002. “Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat.” European Sociological Review 18(1):17–34. doi: 10.1093/esr/18.1.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semyonov, M., R. Raijman, and A. Gorodzeisky. 2006. “The Rise of anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000.” American Sociological Review 71(3):426–49. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semyonov, M., R. Raijman, A. Y. Tov, and P. Schmidt. 2004. “Population Size, Perceived Threat, and Exclusion: A Multiple-Indicators Analysis of Attitudes toward Foreigners in Germany.” Social Science Research 33(4):681–701. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, J. and J. Citrin. 2007. “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37((3):477–504. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. B. 2017. “Does Citizenship Always Further Immigrants’ Feeling of Belonging to the Host Nation? A Study of Policies and Public Attitudes in 14 Western Democracies.” Comparative Migration Studies 5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0050-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobotka, T. 2004. “Is Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe Explained by the Postponement of Childbearing?” Population and Development Review 30(2):195–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.010_1.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T., V. Skirbekk, and D. Philipov. 2011. “Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World.” Population and Development Review 37(2):267–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T. and M. R. Testa. 2008. “Attitudes and Intentions toward Childlessness in Europe,” in People, Population Change and Policies. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6609-2_9.
   Google Scholar
• Stoop, I. A., J. Billiet, A. Koch, and R. Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Szalma, I., H. Hašková, L. Oláh, and J. Takács. 2022. “Fragile Pronatalism and Reproductive Futures in European Post‐Socialist Contexts.” Social Inclusion 10(3):82–6. doi: 10.17645/si.v10i3.6128.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenon, O. 2011. “Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” Population and Development Review 37(1):57–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations 2000. Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?. New York: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2020. International Migration 2020 Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/452).
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36(3):318–40. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. “Ethnicity, Gender Relations and Multiculturalism.” Pp. 193–207 in Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multicultural Identities and the Politics of anti-Racism, edited by P. Werbner and T. Modood. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeman, K., É. Beaujouan, Z. Brzozowska, and T. Sobotka. 2018. “Cohort Fertility Decline in Low Fertility Countries: Decomposition Using Parity Progression Ratios.” Demographic Research 38:651–90. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar