Examining Learner-Controlled Role-Switching in Dyad Practice for the Learning of a Speed Cup-Stacking Task

References

• Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of the model’s knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, C. A., Post, P. G., Hout, M. C., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2020). Self-controlled amount and pacing of practice facilitate learning of a sequential timing task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1704498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacelar, M. F., Parma, J. O., Cabral, D., Daou, M., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2022). Dissociating the contributions of motivational and information processing factors to the self-controlled feedback learning benefit. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 59, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, B., He, W., & Zheng, B. (2018). Performance of single versus two operators in laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery, 1(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2018.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., Carlsen, A. N., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2014). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2017). An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules. Psychological Research, 81(2), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0757-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(4), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kraemer, D. J., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06941.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, G., & Karnath, H. O. (2006). The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(23), 6282–6287. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0638-06.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, D. H., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2018). Relatedness support enhances motor learning. Psychological Research, 82(3), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0833-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados, C., & Wulf, G. (2007). Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: Contributions of observation and dialogue. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand, K. F., Bruzi, A. T., Dyke, F. B., Godwin, M. M., Leiker, A. M., Thompson, A. G., Buchanan, T. L., & Miller, M. W. (2015). Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation. Human Movement Science, 43, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, E. (2018). The effects of observing a learning model (or two) on motor skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0037
   Google Scholar
• Kaefer, A., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2021). Relatedness support enhances motivation, positive affect, and motor learning in adolescents. Human Movement Science, 79, 102864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, A., Alexander, B., & Hodges, N. J. (2022). “You’re wrong, I'll switch, I'm wrong, I'll stay”: How task-switching strategies are modulated by a partner in a multi-task learning protocol. Acta Psychologica, 222, 103475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, A., & Hodges, N. J. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of peer-scheduled practice on motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2(4), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2014-0036
   Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, A., & Hodges, N. J. (2018a). Turn-taking and concurrent dyad practice aid efficiency but not effectiveness of motor learning in a balance-related task. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0029
   Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, A., & Hodges, N. J. (2018b). Dyad practice impacts self-directed practice behaviors and motor learning outcomes in a contextual interference paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(5), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1378996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, A., Welsh, T. N., & Hodges, N. J. (2019). Learning together: Observation and other mechanisms which mediate shared practice contexts. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 141–162). Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keetch, K. M., & Lee, T. D. (2007). The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(5), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessa, H. T., & Chiviacowsky, S. (2015). Self-controlled practice benefits motor learning in older adults. Human Movement Science, 40, 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). Autonomy support via instructionally irrelevant choice not beneficial for motor performance or learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 93(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1795056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B., Yantha, Z., Hussien, J., Carter, M., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). Meta-analytic findings of the self-controlled motor learning literature: Underpowered, biased, and lacking evidential value. Meta-Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2021.2803
   Google Scholar
• McRae, M., Patterson, J. T., & Hansen, S. (2015). Examining the preferred KR schedule of learners and instructors during motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47(6), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2015.1020357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. T., McRae, M., & Hansen, S. (2019). On whether task experience of the peer differentially impacts feedback scheduling and skill acquisition of a learner. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, B., & Lee, T. (1992). Effects of the model’s skill level on observational motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10607553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Luppino, G., & Matelli, M. (1998). The organization of the cortical motor system: New concepts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 106(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00022-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohbanfard, H., & Proteau, L. (2011). Learning through observation: A combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Experimental Brain Research, 215(3-4), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2882-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890009601357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, C., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899909600983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Germain, L., McKay, B., Poskus, A., Williams, A., Leshchyshen, O., Feldman, S., Cashaback, J. G. A., & Carter, M. J. (2023). Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02170-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. F. W., & Magill, R. A. (2011). Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantha, Z. D., McKay, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). The recommendation for learners to be provided with control over their feedback schedule is questioned in a self-controlled learning paradigm. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(7), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.2015945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar