Surrogate Model of Solved Poisson Kriging Method for Radiation Field Reconstruction

References

• X. XIE, J. CAI, and Z. TANG, “The Reconstruction of 3D Radiation Field Based on Sparse Measurement Data,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 179, 109391 (2022); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. ZHU et al., “3-D Gamma Radiation Field Reconstruction Method Using Limited Measurements for Multiple Radioactive Sources,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 175, 109247 (2022); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. ZHU et al., “3-D Gamma Dose Rate Reconstruction for a Radioactive Waste Processing Facility Using Sparse and Arbitrarily-Positioned Measurements,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 144, 104073 (2022); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. C. LEITE et al., “Convolutional Neural Network–Aided Temperature Field Reconstruction: An Innovative Method for Advanced Reactor Monitoring,” Nucl. Technol., 209, 5, 645 (2023); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2151822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. FUCHS, L. L. E. COQ, and M. D. MIGLIORE, “On the Interpolation of Electromagnetic Near Field Without Prior Knowledge of the Radiating Source,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 65, 7, 3568 (2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2017.2705163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LI and A. D. HEAP, “Spatial Interpolation Methods Applied in the Environmental Sciences: A Review,” Environ. Modell. Software, 53, 173 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. RODENAS, “Developing a Virtual Reality Application for Training Nuclear Power Plant Operators: Setting Up a Database Containing Dose Rates in the Refuelling Plant,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 111, 2, 173 (2004); http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. WANG and J. CAI, “Reconstruction of the Neutron Radiation Field on Nuclear Facilities Near the Shield Using Bayesian Inference,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 118, 103070 (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. WANG and J. CAI, “Inversion of Radiation Field on Nuclear Facilities: A Method Based on Net Function Interpolation,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 153, 27 (2018); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. KIKAWA, K. OYAMA, and H. MING, “Landcover Based 3-Dimensional Inverse Distance Weighting for Visualization of Radiation Dose,” Proc. 2019 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES), pp. 370–371, Milan, Italy, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES.2019.00108.
   Google Scholar
• D.-G. KIM et al., “An Estimation Method for Radiation Contrast via the Inverse Distance Weighting,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 29, 6, 2529 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0549-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. GRIGORYEV et al., “Determination of Radiation Field Parameters for the Problems of Routing Optimization Based on Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions,” presented at the 2nd Int. Conf. on Physical Instrumentation and Advanced Materials 2019, p. 020007, Surabaya, Indonesia (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0032248.
   Google Scholar
• B. A. KHUWAILEH and W. A. METWALLY, “Gaussian Process Approach for Dose Mapping in Radiation Fields,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 52, 8, 1807 (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. KÜLAHCI and Z. ŞEN, “Cumulative Ordinary Kriging Interpolation Model to Forecast Radioactive Fallout, and Its Application to Chernobyl and Fukushima Assessment: A New Method and Mini Review,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29, 43, 64298 (2022); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21921-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. S. V. RAO et al., “Identification of Low-Level Point Radiation Sources Using a Sensor Network,” Proc. 2008 Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2008), pp. 493–504 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPSN.2008.19.
   Google Scholar
• J. ZHAO, Z. ZHANG, and C. J. SULLIVAN, “Identifying Anomalous Nuclear Radioactive Sources Using Poisson Kriging and Mobile Sensor Networks,” PLoS One, 14, 5, e0216131 (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. BAI et al., “Multi-Source Term Estimation Based on Parallel Particle Filtering and Dynamic State Space in Unknown Radiation Environments,” Build. Environ., 236, 110281 (2023); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. MONESTIEZ et al., “Geostatistical Modelling of Spatial Distribution of Balaenoptera Physalus in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea from Sparse Count Data and Heterogeneous Observation Efforts,” Ecol. Modell., 193, 3–4, 615 (2006); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. WANG, W. HUANG, and J. SUN, “A Comparative Study of Poisson Kriging’s Matrix Solving Method and Surrogate Model Solving Method,” Proc. 2021 2nd Int. Conf. on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Control (ICCEIC 2021), p 107 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icceic54227.2021.00029.
   Google Scholar
• M. OLIVER and R. WEBSTER, “A Tutorial Guide to Geostatistics: Computing and Modelling Variograms and Kriging,” CATENA, 113, 56 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. ZHANG, Y. ZHONG, and K. LIAO, “A Coordinated Hazardous Source Search Algorithm Based on Gaussian Process Regression,” Proc. 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), pp. 5345–5350, Shanghai, China, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CAC51589.2020.9326943.
   Google Scholar
• A. WEST et al., “Use of Gaussian Process Regression for Radiation Mapping of a Nuclear Reactor with a Mobile Robot,” Sci. Rep., 11, 1, 13975 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93474-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. HE et al., “A Novel Improvement of Kriging Surrogate Model,” AEAT, 91, 7, 994 (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-06-2018-0157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. MOSER, “Hooke-Jeeves Revisited,” Proc. 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2670–2576, Trondheim, Norway, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.4983277.
   Google Scholar
• M. BALABAN, “Review of Dace-Kriging Metamodel,” Interdiscip. Descr. Complex Syst., 21, 3, 316 (2023); http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.21.3.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. WU et al., “CAD-Based Monte Carlo Program for Integrated Simulation of Nuclear System SuperMC,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 161 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-L. ZOU et al., “Analysis of Radial Basis Function Interpolation Approach,” Appl. Geophys., 10, 4, 397 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11770-013-0407-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. LIANG et al., “Real‐Time Inverse Distance Weighting Interpolation for Streaming Sensor Data,” Trans. GIS, 22, 5, 1179 (2018); http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Determination of Space Dose Rate according to the Distribution of Radioactive Materials (H23-H28),” Japan Atomic Energy Agency (2016); https://emdb.jaea.go.jp/emdb_old/portals/b1010116/ (current as of Nov. 1, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Distribution of Radioactive Substances Monitored and Investigated by aircraft(H23-H29),” Japan Atomic Energy Agency (2017); https://emdb.jaea.go.jp/emdb_old/portals/b1010301/ (current as of Nov. 1, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. EDELMANN, T. F. MÓRI, and G. J. SZÉKELY, “On Relationships Between the Pearson and the Distance Correlation Coefficients,” Stat. Prob. Lett., 169, 108960 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2020.108960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar