Balancing diverse purposes in Civics teachers’ assessment decision making

References

• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biberman-Shalev, L., Sabbagh, C., Resh, N., & Kramarski, B. (2011). Grading styles and disciplinary expertise: The mediating role of the teacher’s perception of the subject matter. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. M. (2013). Validity in classroom assessment: Purposes, properties, and principles. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Mixing it up: Combining sources of classroom achievement information for formative and summative purposes. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment [eBook] (pp. 279–296). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874851.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., & Durkin, D. T. (2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (2009). Reliability and validity of information about student achievement: Comparing large-scale and classroom testing contexts. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, K., & Smith, D. (2017). Assessment practices in social studies classrooms: Results from a longitudinal survey. Social Studies Research and Practice, 12(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-04-2017-0015
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (1986). Samhällsorientering och medborgarfostran i svensk skola under 1900-talet. Pedagogiska institutionen, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., & Lindberg, V. (2010). Svensk forskning om bedömning: En kartläggning. Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Gioka, O. (2009). Teacher or examiner? The tensions between formative and summative assessment in the case of science coursework. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9086-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319745
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, Å, & Lindberg, V. (2015). Formativ bedömning på 2000-talet – en översikt av svensk och internationell forskning. Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, T. (2011). Vad kommer på provet?: Gymnasielärares provpraxis i samhällskunskap. Karlstad University.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2016). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1060192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T., & Wools, S. (2020). Perspectives on the validity of classroom assessments. In S. M. Brookhart & J. H. McMillan (Eds.), Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 11–26). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2013). Towards improving public understanding of judgement practice in standards-referenced assessment: An Australian perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M. J., & DeLuca, C. (2012). Rethinking validation in complex high-stakes assessment contexts. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.604023
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759931
   Google Scholar
• Leong, W. S. (2014). Knowing the intentions, meaning and context of classroom assessment: A case study of Singaporean teacher’s conception and practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Gao, R., Guo, S., Haynes, A., Ni, S., & Tang, H. (2021). Examining the associations between educators’ ethics position and ethical judgment in student assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumadi, M. W. (2013). Challenges besetting teachers in classroom assessment: An exploratory perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2013.11893132
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2017). The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1317229
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, H. (1989). Proven i skolan sedda genom lärarnas ögon. Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå university.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 2–16). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n1.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education & Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478321
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2017). There is more to educational measurement than measuring: The importance of embracing purpose pluralism. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 36(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenstad, C. (2011). Prov och bedömning i samhällskunskap: En analys av gymnasielärares skriftliga prov. Karlstad University.
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S. (2013). Variations in grading practice – subjects matter. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 22629. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22629
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, J., Brismark Östlin, A., & Löfgren, H. (2018). Papperspedagoger – lärares arbete med administration i digitaliseringens tidevarv (Report 2018:5). IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2016). Evaluating test validity: Reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1141168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011). Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola 2011. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2017). Swedish grades. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00065.x
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Torrez, C. A., & Claunch-Lebsack, E. A. (2014). The present absence: Assessment in social studies classrooms. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5–6), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.977756
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., Adolfsson, C.-H., & Vogt, B. (2020). Making social studies in standards-based curricula. JSSE – Journal of Social Science Education, 19(SI), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.4119/JSSE-2361
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2015). Theory-based evaluation of the curriculum Lgr 11. IFAU (Working Paper).
   Google Scholar