486
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ reports of off-task behavior and teachers’ instructional support

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 504-519 | Received 02 Mar 2022, Accepted 02 Nov 2022, Published online: 05 Feb 2023

References

  • Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System – Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
  • Baker, J. A., Clark, T. P., Maier, K. S., & Viger, S. (2008). The differential influence of instructional context on the academic engagement of students with behavior problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1876–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.019
  • Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17(2–3), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2012.715014
  • Blazar, D., Braslow, D., Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2017). Attending to general and mathematics-specific dimensions of teaching: Exploring factors across two observation instruments. Educational Assessment, 22(2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2017.1309274
  • Casabianca, J. M., Lockwood, J. R., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2015). Trends in classroom observation scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414539163
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
  • Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087938
  • Downer, J. T., Stuhlman, M., Schweig, J., Martínez, J. F., & Ruzek, E. (2015). Measuring effective teacher–student interactions from a student perspective: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 722–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614564059
  • Eisenhower, A. S., Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2007). Early student–teacher relationships of children with and without intellectual disability: Contributions of behavioral, social, and self-regulatory competence. Journal of School Psychology, 45(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.10.002
  • Ertesvåg, S. K. (2009). Classroom leadership: The effect of a school development programme. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903122194
  • Ertesvåg, S. K. (2016). Students who bully and their perceptions of teacher support and monitoring. British Educational Research Journal, 42(5), 826–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3240
  • Ertesvåg, S. K., & Havik, T. (2021). Students’ proactive aggressiveness, mental health problems and perceived classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1650822
  • Espinosa, L. M., & Laffey, J. M. (2003). Urban primary teacher perceptions of children with challenging behaviors. Journal of Children and Poverty, 9(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796120305436
  • Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
  • Fauth, B., Göllner, R., Lenske, G., Praetorius, A.-K., & Wagner, W. (2020). Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different perspectives. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZPB2001138
  • Fisher, A., & Kloos, H. (2016). Development of selective sustained attention: The role of executive functions. In J. A. Griffin, P. McCardle, & L. S. Freund (Eds.), Executive function in preschool-age children: Integrating measurement, neurodevelopment, and translational research (pp. 215–237). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14797-010
  • Godwin, K. E., Almeda, M. V., Seltman, H., Kai, S., Skerbetz, M. D., Baker, R. S., & Fisher, A. V. (2016). Off-task behavior in elementary school children. Learning and Instruction, 44, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.003
  • Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21741
  • Gregory, A., Ruzek, E., Hafen, C. A., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2017). My teaching partner-secondary: A video-based coaching model. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260402
  • Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System – Secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614537117
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–72). National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
  • Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754
  • Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van de Schoot, R. (2018). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Joe, J. M., McClellan, C. A., & Holtzman, S. L. (2015). Scoring design decisions: Reliability and the length and focus of classroom observations. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 415–442). Jossey-Bass.
  • Kang, D., Stough, L. M., Yoon, M., & Liew, J. (2021). The structural association between teacher-student relationships and school engagement: Types and informants. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100072
  • Katz, I. (2017). In the eye of the beholder: Motivational effects of gender differences in perceptions of teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1101533
  • Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environment Research, 9(3), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
  • Landers, R. (2015). Computing intraclass correlations (ICC) as estimates of interrater reliability in SPSS. The Winnower, 2, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.143518.81744
  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
  • Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., & Trautwein, U. (2011). A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: Accuracy–bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 444–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024376
  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001
  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
  • Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014240
  • McClowry, S. G., Rodriguez, E. T., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Spellmann, M. E., Carlson, A., & Snow, D. L. (2013). Teacher/student interactions and classroom behavior: The role of student temperament and gender. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.796330
  • Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Scalas, L. F. (2014). Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.769412
  • Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x
  • Muthén, B. O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. Sociological Methodology, 27(1), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9531.271034
  • Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/271070
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf
  • NESH. (2021). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences and the humanities. The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH).
  • Pettigrew, J., Miller-Day, M., Shin, Y., Hecht, M. L., Krieger, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2013). Describing teacher–student interactions: A qualitative assessment of teacher implementation of the 7th grade keepin’ it REAL substance use intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9539-1
  • Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
  • Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012a). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer Nature.
  • Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012b). Classroom assessment scoring system: Secondary manual. Teachstone.
  • Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210374874
  • Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Early, D. M., Cox, M. J., Saluja, G., Pianta, R. C., Bradley, R. H., & Payne, C. (2002). Early behavioral attributes and teachers’ sensitivity as predictors of competent behavior in the kindergarten classroom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-3973(02)00128-4
  • Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., La Paro, K. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). The contribution of classroom setting and quality of instruction to children’s behavior in kindergarten classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 105(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1086/429948. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086429948
  • Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
  • Ruzek, E. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). The value of using observational and student report methodologies in classroom research. In C. Rubie-Davies, J. Stephens, & P. Watson (Eds.), The social psychology of the classroom international handbook (pp. 231–241). Routledge.
  • Ryu, E. (2014). Model fit evaluation in multilevel structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(81), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00081
  • Thuen, E., & Bru, E. (2000). Learning environment, meaningfulness of schoolwork and on-task-orientation among Norwegian 9th grade students. School Psychology International, 21(4), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300214004
  • Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003
  • Walker, S., & Graham, L. (2021). At risk students and teacher-student relationships: Student characteristics, attitudes to school and classroom climate. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(8), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1588925
  • Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216671864
  • Wang, M. T., Hofkens, T., & Ye, F. (2020). Classroom quality and adolescent student engagement and performance in mathematics: A multi-method and multi-informant approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(10), 1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01195-0
  • Westergård, E., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Rafaelsen, F. (2019). A preliminary validity of the classroom assessment scoring system in Norwegian lower-secondary schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1415964
  • Zhang, X., Nurmi, J. E., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Aunola, K. (2011). A teacher-report measure of children’s task-avoidant behavior: A validation study of the behavioral strategy rating scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.007

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.