Clinical Evidence, Triangulation of Perspectives and Contextualization. Part 1: The Beginning of Carla’s Treatment

REFERENCES

• Allison, E. & Fonagy, P. (2016). When is truth relevant? Psychoanal. Q., 85:275–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann de Litvan, M., ed. (2014). Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann de Litvan, M., ed. (2021). Clinical Research in Psychoanalysis: Theoretical Basis and Experiences Through Working Parties. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 312–323.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, M., Bernardi, R. & Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. A. (2021). Is the three-level model a clinical research tool? In Clinical Research in Psychoanalysis: Theoretical Basis and Experiences Through Working Parties, ed. M. Altmann. London: Routledge, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am. Psychologist, 61:271–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. Amer. Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion Int., 11:11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, B. & Simonsen, S. (2021). How does level of personality functioning inform clinical management and treatment? Implications for ICD-11 classification of personality disorder severity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34:54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. (1963). Bad faith, identity and omnipotence Baranger, Madeleine. Revista Uruguaya Psicoanálisis, 5:199–229.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., Baranger, W. & Mom, J. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. The Int. J. Psychoanal., 64:13.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int. J. Psychoanal., 89:795–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int. J. Psychoanal., 70:341–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. & Bernardi, B. (1993). Does our self-analysis take into consideration our assumptions. In Self-analysis. Critical Inquiries, Personal Visions. London: Analytic Press, pp. 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: the debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83:851–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. & Bernardi, B. D. L. (2012). The concepts of vinculo and dialectical spiral: a bridge between intra-and intersubjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 81:531–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2014a). The three-level model (3-LM) for observing patient transformations. In Time for Change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model. London: Karnac, pp. 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2014b). The assessment of changes: diagnostic aspects. In Time for change: Tracking Transformations in Psychoanalysis—The Three-Level Model, ed. M. Altmann de Litvan. London: Karnac, pp. 263–278.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? Int. J. Psychoanal., 96:731–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., Varela, B., Miller, D., Zytner, R., de Souza, L. & Oyenard, R. (2016), Premio P. Techera. La formulación psicodinámica de caso. Su valor para la práctica clínica. Monevideo, Uruguay: Grupo Magro and Universidad Católica del Uruguay.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. (2017). A common ground in clinical discussion groups: intersubjective resonance and implicit operational theories. Int. J. Psychoanal., 98:1291–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. & Eidlin, M. (2018). Thin-skinned or vulnerable narcissism and thick-skinned or grandiose narcissism: similarities and differences. Int. J. Psychoanal., 99:291–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2019. About the criteria for evaluating patient transformations in “Ending Analysis: The Case of Karl.” Int. J. Psychoanal. 99:1424–1457.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. 2021a. Moving from clinical inquiry to clinical research. In Clinical Research in Psychoanalysis: Theoretical Basis and Experiences Through Working Parties, ed., M. Altmann. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. Working groups and the search for clinical evidence (2021b). In Clinical research in Psychoanalysis: Theoretical Basis and Experiences Through Working Parties, ed., M. Altmann. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 312–323.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. & Pérez Suquilvide, L. with discussion by Charles Hanly (2021c). Assessing strengths and limitations of clinical evidence in a psychoanalytic clinical material. In Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis. Transformations and Interpretations, the Three-Level Model, ed., M. A. Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan, & R. Bernardi. London: Routledge, pp. 281–305.
   Google Scholar
• Blass R. (2017). Committed to a single model and open to reality. J. Amer. Psychoanal, Assn., 65:845–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluml, V. & Doering S. (2021). ICD-11. Personality disorders: a psychodynamic perspective on personality functioning. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (2002). Why don’t our institutes teach the methodology of clinical psychoanalytic evidence? Psychoanal. Q., 71:445–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (2005). Psychoanalytic controversies contextualized. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 53:835–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (2013). What does the presentation of case material tell us about what actually happened in an analysis and how does it do this? Int. J. Psychoanal., 94:1135–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, R. & Steiner, J. (1994). Interpretation: selected fact or overvalued idea. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75:1069–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchheim, A., Hörz-Sagstetter, S., Doering, S., Rentrop, M., Schuster, P., Buchheim, P., Pokorny, D. & Fischer-Kern, M. (2017). “Change of unresolved attachment in borderline personality disorder: RCT study of transference-focused psychotherapy. Psychother. Psychosom., 86:314–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchheim, A. & Diamond, D. (2018). Attachment and borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics North Amer., 41:651–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligor, E., Kernberg, O. F. & Clarín, J. F. (2007). Handbook of Dynamic Psychotherapy for Higher Level Personality Pathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Caligor, E., Diamond, D., Yeomans, F. E. & Kernberg, O. F. (2009). The interpretive process in the psychoanalytic psychotherapy of borderline personality pathology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 57:271–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligor, E., Levy, K. N. & Yeomans, F. E. (2015). Narcissistic personality disorder: diagnostic and clinical challenges. Amer. J. Psychiatry, 172:415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligor, E., Kernberg, O. F. & Yeomans, J. F. (2018). Psychodynamic Therapy for Personality Pathology: Treating Self and Interpersonal Functioning. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. M. S. (2005). From bastion to enactment: the ‘non‐dream’ in the theatre of analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:699–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans F. E. & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality. Focusing on Object Relations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkin, J. F., Cain, N. M. & Lenzenweger, M. F. (2018). Advances in transference-focused psychotherapy derived from the study of borderline personality disorder: clinical insights with a focus on mechanism. Current Opinion Psychol., 21:80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkin, J. F., Meehan, K. B., De Panfilis, C. & Doering, S. (2022). Empirical developments in transference-focused psychotherapy. Amer. J. Psychotherapy, 76:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de León de Bernardi, B. (2008). “Introduction to the paper by Madeleine and Willy Baranger: the analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int. J. Psychoanal., 89:773–784. Published also in Rev. urug. Psychoanal.,108:198-222, 2009; and in The Turkish Annual Book.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de León de Bernardi, B. (2021). Metaphors for the patient self as a multiple bridge for clinical research. In New Perspectives in Clinical Research. An Experience Through Different Working Parties, ed. M. Altmann. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal Mixed Methods Research, 6:80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. J. (2020). Return of the repressed: revisiting dissociation and the psychoanalysis of the traumatized mind. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 68:839–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, D., Yeomans F. E., Stern, B. E. & Kernberg, O. F. (2021). Treating Pathological Narcissism with Transference-Focused Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2017). Crystallization. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992). Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J. Amer. Medical Assn., 268:2420–2425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. (1996). Listening to listening. Int. J. Psychoanal., 77:667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. A., Altmann, M. & Bernardi, R. (2021a). Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis: Transformations and Interventions, The Three Level Model. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. A., Altmann, M. & Bernardi, R. (2021b). Guidelines for organizing 3-LM Groups. In Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis: Transformations and Interventions, The Three Level Model, ed. M. A. Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. Altmann & R. Bernardi. Abingdon. New York: Routledge, pp. 309–333.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick Hanly, N. A., Gullestad, S. E., White, R. S. & Bernardi, R. (2021c). Transformation and interpretation: the case of Adam. a clinical narrative and discussion. Psychoanal. Q., 90:439–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2000). Attachment and borderline personality disorder. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48:1129–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P. (2015). Mutual regulation, mentalization, and therapeutic action: a reflection on the contributions of Ed Tronick to developmental and psychotherapeutic thinking. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 35:355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Luyten, P. & Allison, E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: a new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. J. Personality Disorders, 29:575–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E. & Campbell, Ch. (2017). What we have changed our minds about: Part 2. Borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust and the developmental significance of social communication. Border Personality Disorder & Emotion Dysregulation, 4:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E. & Campbell, Ch. (2019). Mentalizing, epistemic trust and the phenomenology of psychotherapy. Psychopathology, 52:94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An Introduction. S. E., 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. S. E., 17.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1926). The Question of Lay Analysis. S. E., 20.
   Google Scholar
• Grunbaum, A. (1993). Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, S. E. & Killingmo, B. (2019). The Theory and Practice of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Listening for the Subtext. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, J. G., Fruzzetti, A., Unruh, B. & Choi-Kain, L. (2018). Competing theories of borderline personality disorder. J. Personality Disorders, 32:148–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Vist, G. E., Liberati, A. & Schünemann, H. J. 2008. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 336:1049–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. & Hacking, J. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanly, Ch. (2021). Commentary: perspectives from the philosophy of science. In Change Through Time in Psychoanalysis: Transformations and Interventions, The Three Level Model, ed. M. A. Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. Altmann & R. Bernardi. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 300–305.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. (2022). Primacy of affects in human development: discussion of Otto F. Kernberg’s “Some Implications of New Developments in Neurobiology for Psychoanalytic Object Relations Theory.” Neuropsychoanalysis, 24:127–132.
   Google Scholar
• International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (2019). In ICD-11. Geneva: World Health Organization,
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1939). Criteria for interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 20:148–160.
   Google Scholar
• Iwakabe, S. (2013). Competing models of evidence and corroborating research strategies: shaping the landscape of psychotherapy research in the era of evidence-based practice. Psychologia, 56:89–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. P. (2009). Grasping psychoanalysts’ practice in its own merits. Int. J. Psychoanal., 90:231–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. P. & Altimir, C. (2019). Beyond the hermeneutic/scientific controversy: a case for a clinically sensitive empirical research paradigm in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 100:940–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kächele, H., Schachter, J. & Thomä, H. (2011). From Psychoanalytic Narrative to Empirical Single Case Research: Implications for Psychoanalytic Practice. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1970). Factors in the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personalities. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 18:51–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1974). Further contribution to the treatment of narcissistic personalities. Int. J. Psychoanal., 55:215–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1980). Internal World and External Reality: Object Relation Relations Theory Applied. New York: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1997). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorders: theoretical background and diagnostic classification. In Disorders of Narcissism: Diagnostic, Clinical, and Empirical Implications, ed. E. F. Ronningstam. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, pp. 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2004). Aggressivity, Narcissism and Self-destructiveness in the Psychotherapeutic Relationship. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The almost untreatable narcissistic patient. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 55:503–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F., Yeomans, F. E., Clarkin, J. F. & Levy, K. N. (2008). Transference focused psychotherapy: overview and update. Int. J. Psychoanal., 89:601–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2010). Narcissistic personality disorder. In Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Clinical Handbook, ed. J. F. Clarkin, P. Fonagy & G. O. Gabbard. Arlington, VA: Amer. Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 257–287.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2012). The Inseparable Nature of Love and Aggression: Clinical and Theoretical Perspectives. Arlington, VA: Amer. Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2014). An overview of the treatment of severe narcissistic pathology. Int. J. Psychoanal., 95:865–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Narcissistic defenses in the distortion of free association and their underlying anxieties. Psychoanal. Q., 84:625–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2016). New developments in transference-focused psychotherapy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 97:385–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2022). Some implications of new developments in neurobiology for psychoanalytic object relations theory. Neuropsychoanalysis, 24:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Killingmo B. (1995). Affirmation in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 76:503–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFarge, L. (2017). “From “either/or” to “and”: the analyst’s use of multiple models in clinical work” J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 65:829–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Caligor, E., Cain, N. M. & Kernberg, O. F. (2018). Malignant narcissism in relation to clinical change in borderline personality disorder: an exploratory study. Psychopathology, 51:318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Solms, M., & Arnold, S. E., eds. (2020). Outcome Research and the Future of Psychoanalysis: Clinicians and Researchers in Dialogue. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R. & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. Amer. Psychologist, 73:26–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychol., 8:95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, K. N., Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., Scott, L. N., Wasserman, R. H. & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). The mechanisms of change in the treatment of borderline personality disorder with transference focused psychotherapy. J. Clinical psychol., 62:481–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lingiardi, V. & McWilliams, N., eds. (2017). Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual: PDM-2. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, P., Campbell, C. & Fonagy, P. (2020). Borderline personality disorder, complex trauma, and problems with self and identity: a social‐communicative approach. J. Personality, 88:88–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten, P. & Fonagy, P. (2022). Integrating and differentiating personality and psychopathology: a psychodynamic perspective. J. Personality, 90:75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllum, K., Fox, S., Simpson, M. & Unson, C. (2019). A comparative tale of two methods: How thematic and narrative analyses author the data story differently. Communication Research & Practice, 5:358–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann T. C. & Ferguson M. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. J. Personality & Social Psychol., 108:823–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini C. (2021). What “evidence” in evidence-based medicine? Topoi 40:299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2022). Reflections on the way I practice psychoanalysis. In Psychoanalytic Credos. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• OPD Task Force. (2008). Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis OPD-2. Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research. 34:1189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichon Rivière, E. (1971). From Psychoanalysis to Social Psychology (Vols I & II). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Galerna.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, B. & Falkenström, F. (2021). What research evidence is valid for psychotherapy research? Frontiers in Psychiatry,11:625380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, F. (1994). Multiple models, clinical practice, and psychoanalytic theory: response to discussants. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 14:212–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Quiroga de Pereira, A., Borensztein, L., Corbella, V. & Marengo, J. C. (2018). The Lara case: a group analysis of initial psychoanalytic interviews using systematic clinical observation and empirical tools. Int. J. Psychoanal., 99:1327–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Quiroga, A., Aufenacker, S., Crawley, A., Waldron, S., Borensztein, L., Botero, C. & Bongiardino, L. (2023a). A multicentre study: comparison of 3-LM group output and therapeutic outcome measures. Adding to the trustworthiness of the 3-LM? Part 1. Int. J. Psychoanal., 104:69–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Quiroga, A., Aufenacker, S., Crawley, A., Waldron, S., Borensztein, L., Botero, C. & Bongiardino, L. (2023b). A multicentre study: comparison of 3-LM group output and therapeutic outcome measures. Adding to the trustworthiness of the 3-LM? Part 2. Int. J. Psychoanal., 104:96–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (2009). What is “le Penseur” doing? In Collected Essays 1929-1968. New York/London: Routledge, p.17.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett D. L., Richardson W. S., Rosenberg W., Haynes R. B. & Langley, G. R. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Canadian Medical Assn. J., 157:788.
   Google Scholar
• Sacristan, J. A., (2012). Evidence based medicine and patient centered medicine: some thoughts on their integration. Rev Clin Esp (Barc), 213:460–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psychanal., 64:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalabrini, A., Esposito, R. & Mucci, C. (2021). Dreaming the unrepressed unconscious and beyond: repression vs dissociation in the oneiric functioning of severe patients. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 24:545.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., Ha, C., Carbone, C., Kim, S., Perry, K., Williams, L. & Fonagy, P. (2013). Hypermentalizing in adolescent inpatients: treatment effects and association with borderline traits. J. Personality Disorders, 27:3–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, A. D., LaChapelle, K. J., Rachon, N. A. & Furberg, C. D. (2013). The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88:1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, K. (2009). Underdetermination of scientific theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab Philosophy Dept.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K, Morgan A. C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N. & Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy. The ‘something more’ than interpretation. The process of Change Study Group. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79:903–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. (2001). Assimilation of problematic experiences. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38:462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma, H. & Kaechele, H. (2007). Comparative psychoanalysis on the basis of a new form of treatment report. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 27:650–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. Z. (2003). “Of course all relationships are unique”: How co-creative processes generate unique mother-infant and patient-therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 23:473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, B. Ch. (2014). Underdetermination in evidence-based medicine. J. Evaluation Clinical Practice, 20:921–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeomans, F. E., Clarín, J. F., Kernberg, O. F. (2002). A Primer for Transference-Focused Psychotherapy for Borderline Patient. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Yeomans, F. E., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Transference-focused Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Clinical Guide. Washington, DC/London: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Hennen, J., & Silk, K. R. (2003). The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder. Amer. J. Psychiatry, 160:274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar