A rollercoaster STEM activity involving virtual reality

REFERENCES

• Alnıak, S. 2019. Examination of effects of STEM education on students’ problem-solving skills and attitudes in physics [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., C. Reinburg, and J. Horak. 2010. The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2013. The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., and S. W. Slough. 2013. Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM project-based learning, 1–5. Rotterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y. H., and P. Y. Chu. 2018. The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3D-printing STEAM engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (6):1047–64. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağıltay, K., J. Çakıroğlu, N. Çağıltay, and E. Çakıroğlu. 2001. Teachers’ perspectives about the use of computers in education. Journal of Hacettepe University Education Faculty 21 (1):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Çakiroğlu, Ü., and S. Gökoğlu. 2019. Development of fire safety behavioral skills via virtual reality. Computers & Education 133:56–68. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çorlu, M. S., R. M. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro. 2014. Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science 39 (171):74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsan, H., E. Gajdzik, and M. Cardella. 2019. Design an amusement park: Engineering for children with autism. Connected Science Learning 1 (10). https://www.nsta.org/connected-science-learning/connected-science-learningapril-june-2019/design-amusement-park.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., and D. T. King. 2015. STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education 2 (1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., D. King, and J. Smeed. 2017. Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grade students’ design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings. The Journal of Educational Research 110 (3):255–71. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1264053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, M. 2013. Robotics intrigue middle school students and build STEM skills. Technology and Engineering Teacher 72 (6):12–6.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber. 2014. STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects and an agenda for research. Washington: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamińska, D., T. Sapiński, S. Wiak, T. Tikk, R. Haamer, E. Avots, A. Helmi, C. Ozcinar, and G. Anbarjafari. 2019. Virtual reality and its applications in education: Survey. Information 10 (10):318. doi:10.3390/info10100318.
   Google Scholar
• Karahan, E. 2020. Investigating STEM-focused instructional module designs of engineering students. Bogazici University Journal of Education 37:73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C., M. Lai, and D. Sun. 2020. Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education 151:103872, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laçin Şimşek, C., and M. T. Soysal. 2022. Deprem temalı mühendislik tasarım temelli STEM etkinliklerinin akademik başarı, motivasyon, STEM’e yönelik tutum ve 21. yüzyıl becerilerine etkisi. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education 6 (4):133–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., and J. Malyn-Smith. 2020. Computational thinking integration patterns along the framework defining computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29 (1):9–18. doi:10.1007/s10956-019-09802-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C. Burton, P. E. E, and Guzey, S. S. 2015. The need for a STEM road map. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters, Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Third Avenue, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2011. Beginning engineering, science and technology educator guides: An educator’s guide to the engineering design process grades 6-8. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/630754main_NASAsBESTActivi tyGuide6-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Building capacity for teaching engineering in K-12 education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasrudin, D., C. Rochman, H. Y. Suhendi, I. Helsy, A. Rasyid, I. Aripin, … A. Mayasri. 2020. STEM education for pre-service teacher: Why and how? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1563 (1):012039. June) IOP Publishing
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-Raya, E., J. Ferreira-Cavalcanti, M. Contero, M. C. Castellanos, I. A. C. Giglioli, and M. Alcañiz. 2018. Mobile virtual reality as an educational platform: A pilot study on the impact of immersion and positive emotion induction in the learning process. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (6):2045–57. doi:10.29333/ejmste/85874.
   Google Scholar
• Özçelik, A., and D. Akgündüz. 2018. Evaluation of gifted/talented students’ out-of-school STEM education. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty 8 (2):334–51.
   Google Scholar
• Özdinç, F., G. Kaya, F. Mumcu, and B. Yıldız. 2022. Integration of computational thinking into STEM activities: An example of an interdisciplinary unplugged programming activity. Science Activities 59 (3):151–9. doi:10.1080/00368121.2022.2071817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, D. 2017. Evaluating the effects of immersive embodied interaction on cognition in virtual reality., Doctoral Thesis., Clemson University.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, B., W. Xing, G. Zhu, K. Antonyan, and C. Xie. 2022. Integrating infrared technologies in science learning: An evidence-based reasoning perspective. Education and Information Technologies 28 (7):8423–43. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11538-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C., and M. Portsmore. 2004. Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research 5 (3/4):17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., S. Sinha, D. M. Bressler, and L. Ginsburg. 2017. Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education 4 (1):13. doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, T., and H. Tüzün. 2022. Investigating the effects of low-cost head-mounted display based virtual reality environments on learning and presence. Multimedia Tools and Applications 82 (9):14307–27. doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13794-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Birmingham Post. 1972. May 31. Three children die in Big Dipper fair crush.
   Google Scholar
• URL-1. https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/hs-ps3-energy
   Google Scholar
• URL-2. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/13165/chapter/7#71
   Google Scholar
• URL-3. https://vrschoolresearch.com/about/
   Google Scholar
• Wick, D. P., M. W. Ramsdell, K. Fowler, P. Turner, and P. D. Schalk. 2011. University outreach in STEM education through a Roller Coaster Science and Engineering Camp. 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wrzesien, M., and M. A. Raya. 2010. Learning in serious virtual worlds: Evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the E-Junior project. Computers & Education 55 (1):178–87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, B., E. S. Topalcengiz, G. Arikan, and S. Timur. 2020. Using virtual reality in the classroom: Reflections of STEM teachers on the use of teaching and learning tools. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health 6 (3):231–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., S. Ji, T. Xu, and Z. Wang. 2018. Promoting knowledge construction: A model for using virtual reality interaction to enhance learning. Procedia Computer Science 130:239–46. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.035.
   Google Scholar