Socially Distant Social Constructivism: Transitioning Visual Arts Pedagogies Online During COVID-19

References

• Abderrahim, L., & Gutiérrez-Colón Plana, M. (2021). A theoretical journey from social constructivism to digital storytelling. EuroCALL Review, 29(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2021.12853
   Google Scholar
• Akpan, V. I., Igwe, U. A., Mpamah, I. B. I., & Okoro, C. O. (2020). Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning. British Journal of Education, 8(8), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, F. (2014). The experience of teaching tertiary visual arts education in a purely online learning environment. Australian Art Education, 36(1), 48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Morgan, K. (2016). Beyond the text: Critique and creativity. In Z. Bańkowski, M. Del Mar, & P. Maharg (Eds.), The arts and the legal academy: Beyond text in legal education (pp. 213–224). Routledge. (Original work published 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackaller, L. (2008). Performing process: The artist studio as interactive art [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Blagoeva, N. V., Karppinen, S., & Kairavuori, S. (2019). The integrated approach to teaching visual art in after-school activity classes. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buelow, S., Frambaugh-Kritzer, C., & Au, C. (2018). Communicating like an artist: Disciplinary literacy instruction in elementary visual arts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(3), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1453896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, M. L. (2007). Contemporary approaches to critical thinking and the World Wide Web. Art Education, 60(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2007.11651622
   Google Scholar
• Buren, D. (1979). The function of the studio (T. Repensek, Trans.). October, 10, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/778628
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, R. M., & Bouché, A.-M. (2017). Team-teaching art appreciation online without a traditional textbook. Reference Librarian, 58(4), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2017.1352557
   Google Scholar
• Coward, F. L., Hamman, D., Johnson, L., Lambert, M., Indiatsi, J., & Zhou, L. (2015). Centrality of enactive experiences, framing, and motivation to student teachers’ emerging professional identity. Teaching Education, 26(2), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.996741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delacruz, E. (2004). Teachers’ working conditions and the unmet promise of technology. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2004.11650065
   Google Scholar
• Deneen, C. C., Lumsden Brown, B. T., & Carless, D. (2018). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Simon & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, D., & Koh, E. H. Y. (2020). Promoting knowledge management processes through an interactive virtual wall in a postgraduate business finance course. Journal of Education for Business, 95(4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1635977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R. (2000). Generalizability and the single-case study. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method: Key issues, key texts (pp. 45–68). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer, J. G. (2013). Student migration to online education: An economic model. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 9(1), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J., & Newman, M. (Eds.). (2007). The state of art criticism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frison, D., & Tino, C. (2019). Fostering knowledge sharing via technology: A case study of collaborative learning using padlet. In M. Fedeli & L. L. Bierema (Eds.), Connecting adult learning and knowledge management (pp. 227–235). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, J., Cantrell, K., Bryce, I., Daken, K., Durham, J., Mullens, A., Batorowicz, B., & Johnson, R. (2022). Coping with COVID: Pandemic narratives for Australian children. Heliyon, 8(5), e09454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill-Simmen, L. (2021). Using Padlet in instructional design to promote cognitive engagement: A case study of undergraduate marketing students. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (20). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi20.575
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, S. (2008). Compulsory participation in online discussions: Is this constructivism or normalisation of learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290801950427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennrikus, E. F., Skolka, M. P., & Hennrikus, N. (2020). Social constructivism in medical school where students become patients with dietary restrictions. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S259727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. (Ed.). (2012). The studio. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• jagodzinski, j. (2019). Postmodern dilemmas: Outrageous essays in art and art education. Routledge. (Original work published 1997)
   Google Scholar
• Jamero, J. L. F. (2019). Social constructivism and play of children with autism for inclusive early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 11(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.670475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochum, R. (2019). Forward design: Creative technologies in art education. In G. Blast, E. G. Carayannis, & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), The future of education and labor (pp. 181–202). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. L. (2015). Collective learning resources: Connecting social-learning practices in deviantART to art education. Studies in Art Education, 56(4), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2015.11518975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanchan, M., & Singh, N. (2017). Constructivist approach: A way of learning. GHG Journal of Sixth Thought, 4(2), 68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kárpáti, A., Simon, T., & Gaul-Ács, Á. (2016). Digital creativity and net generation students: retooling the art and design environment at school. In Proceedings of the European Distance and e-Learning Network 2016 Annual Conference (pp. 599–609). Mason. https://proc.eden-online.org/index.php/PROC/article/view/1500
   Google Scholar
• Kivunja, C. (2014). Do you want your students to be job-ready with 21st century skills? Change pedagogies: A pedagogical paradigm shift from Vygotskyian social constructivism to critical thinking, problem solving, and Siemens’ digital connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, N. F. (2019). The shape activity: Social constructivism in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 46(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauth, N. (2002). The preface as exegesis. LINQ, 29(2), 50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle, M., & Bednarz, N. (1998). Constructivism and education: Beyond epistemological correctness. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 3–20). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. (2017). ePortfolio as pedagogy: Threshold concepts for curriculum design. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(1–2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017694497
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E., & Hyland, P. B. (2022). Studious drift: Movements and protocols for a postdigital education. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luger, J. D. (2016). Must art have a “place”? Questioning the power of the digital art-scape. M/C Journal, 19(3). https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1094 https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1094
   Google Scholar
• Maihoub, A. (2015). Thinking through the sociality of art objects. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v7.25782
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M. (2007). Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2
   Google Scholar
• Mandalaki, E., & Daou, E. (2020). (Dis)embodied encounters between art and academic writing amid a pandemic. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12499
   Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Application, reflection and ethics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowski, R., Breit, H., Eckensberger, L., & Scheerens, J. (2009). A conceptual framework on informal learning of active citizenship competencies. In J. Scheerens (Ed.), Informal learning of active citizenship at school: An international comparative study in seven European countries (pp. 11–24). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Memiş, C. (2021). Elementary school teachers’ views scale on the using Zoom in compulsory distance education during the pandemic: Psychometric properties. European Educational Researcher, 4(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.428
   Google Scholar
• Miiller, S., & Smith, L. (2009). Distance learning in the visual arts. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 496–505.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem, N. H. (2019). Students’ perceptions about the impact of using Padlet on class engagement: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2019100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020). Decolonization of knowledge-construction in university classrooms: The place of social constructivism. Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa, 9(2), 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S., & Shreeve, A. (2018). Art and design pedagogy in higher education: Knowledge, values, and ambiguity in the creative curriculum. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. (2005). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed., pp. 279–308). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, J. T. (2021). My pandemic pedagogy playbook: A glimpse into higher education in the Dutch Zoom-room. Journal of Children and Media, 15(1), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1858906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitri, E. (2006). Teacher research in the socioconstructivist art classroom. Art Education, 59(5), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651610
   Google Scholar
• Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
   Google Scholar
• Rajiah, K. (2018). Technology enhanced collaborative learning in small group teaching sessions using Padlet application—A pilot study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 11(9), 3943–3946. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00724.2
   Google Scholar
• Relyea, L. (2010). Studio unbound. In M. J. Jacob & M. Grabner (Eds.), The studio reader: On the space of artists (pp. 341–349). School of the Art Institute of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. (2016). Defining, designing for, and measuring “social constructivist digital literacy” development in learners: A proposed framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9423-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, C. (2017). The ePortfolio: Constructing learning in translation technology. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1306995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusnack, L. M. (2012). Virtual arts online educational trends. In S. Kelsey & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Computer- mediated communication: Issues and approaches in education (pp. 89–99). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Rytilä, J. (2021). Social constructivism in mathematics? The promise and shortcomings of Julian Cole’s institutional account. Synthese, 199(3–4), 11517–11540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03300-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saepuloh, A., & Salsabila, V. A. (2020). The teaching of writing recount texts by utilizing Padlet. Indonesian EFL Journal, 6(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v6i1.2637
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K. M. (2020). Constructionism in art studios. In N. Holbert, M. Berland, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Designing constructionist futures: The art, theory, and practice of learning designs (pp. 323–330). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, R. H., & Slee, P. T. (2015). Child development: Theories and critical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2021). Strategies for nurturing evaluative judgement in design students. In C. Smith (Ed.), Progressive studio pedagogy: Examples from architecture and allied design fields (pp. 100–124). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. (2003). (Re)inventing artists’ research: Constructing living forms of theory. TEXT, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.32504
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K., Kolb, G., & Tervo, J. (Eds.). (2021). Post-digital, post-internet art and education: The future is all-over. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thuketana, N. S., & Westhof, L. (2018). Group work during visual art activities to reduce indecisiveness. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 8(1), a447. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.V8i1.447
   Google Scholar
• Tran, D., & Nguyen, G.-N. T. (2021). Presence in online mathematics methods courses: Design principles across institutions. In K. Hollebrands, R. Anderson, & K. Oliver (Eds.), Online learning in mathematics education (pp. 43–63). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watty, K., & McKay, J. (2015). Pedagogy and ePortfolios: Purpose aligned to design (or the why and how). International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 10(3), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2015.1135498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling, J. (Ed.). (2011). See it again. Say it again: The artist as researcher. Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, J., Cutcher, A., & Wilks, S. (2012). Digital technology in the visual arts classroom: An [un]easy partnership. Studies in Art Education, 54(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2012.11518879
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Watkins, M., & Grant, G. (2017). Making visual arts learning visible in a generalist elementary school classroom. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(13). http://www.ijea.org/v18n13
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar