Collaborating for Sustainable Access to Digital Art: A Project Overview

References

• Angevaare, I. 2010. “A Future for Our Digital Memory: Born-Digital Cultural Heritage in the Netherlands.” Art Libraries Journal 35 (3): 17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307472200016497
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni, G., and J. McKim. 2022. “Experimentation and Collecting Practice: Balancing Flexible Policies and Accountability in Developing Born-Digital Museum Collections.” Museum Management and Curatorship. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2022.2133782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brum, O. 2023. “CS0001 - Case Study Report Summary.” LIMA. https://wiki.li-ma.nl/index.php/CS0001:Case_Study_Summary. Available on Request.
   Google Scholar
• Brum, O. n.d. “Case Study Report Summary.” https://wiki.li-ma.nl/index.php/CS0002:Case_Study_Summary. Available on request.
   Google Scholar
• Brum, O. n.d. “Case Study Report Summary.” https://wiki.li-ma.nl/index.php/CS0003:Case_Study_Summary.
   Google Scholar
• Brum, O., and R. Rozendaal. 2020. “Rafaël Rozendaal.” Unpublished artist interview.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, A. 2018. Collecting and Conserving Net Art: Moving beyond Conventional Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, D., and J. Phillips, eds. 2023. Conservation of Time-Based Media Art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, D., et al. 2023. “Caring for Software and Computer Based Art.” In Conservation of Time-Based Media Art, edited by D. Engel and J. Phillips, 453–511. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Falcão, P., A. Ashe, and B. Jones. 2014. “Virtualisation as a Tool for the Conservation of Software-Based Artworks.” International Conference on Digital Preservation.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. 2014. “Identifying and Pursuing Authenticity in Contemporary Art.” In Authenticity and Replication: The 'Real Thing' in Art and Conservation, edited by R. Gordon, E. Hermens, and F. Lennard, 95–107. London, UK: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim. “The Conserving Computer Based Art Initiative.” Accessed June 15, 2023. https://www.guggenheim.org/conservation/the-conserving-computer-based-art-initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Caitlin. 2010. “Do It Yourself: Distributing Responsibility for Media Arts Preservation and Documentation.” In Archive 2020, edited by A. Dekker, 50–59, Amsterdam: Virtueel Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, P. 2006. “Authenticity, Change and Loss in the Conservation of Time-Based Media Installations.” Tate Papers, no. 6. www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/authenticity-change-and-loss-conservation-of-time-based-media-installations.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. 2023. “Building a Time-based Media Conservation Lab: A Survey and Practical Guide, from Minimum Requirements to Dream.” In Conservation of Time-Based Media Art, edited by D. Engel and J. Phillips, 95–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LIMA. 2023. “Case study reports.” Accessed May 19, 2023. https://wiki.li-ma.nl/. Available on request.
   Google Scholar
• LIMA. n.d. “Collaborative Infrastructure.” Accessed February 27, 2024. https://www.li-ma.nl/lima/article/collaborative-infrastructure-sustainable-access-digital-art.
   Google Scholar
• LIMA, J. Jongeleen, S. Kensche, S. Swart, G. Wijers, and O. Brum. 2022. “20221128_deel Van Interview Met Jeroen Jongeleen_1:22:37_SK.m4a.” Artist Interview. in Artist Interview - Recordings. Available on request.
   Google Scholar
• LIMA, R. Rozendaal, F. Haverkamp, G. Wijers, and W. Seuskens. 2022. “video1724839523.” Artist Interview. in Artist Interview - Recording, available on request.
   Google Scholar
• LIMA, R. Rozendaal, W. Seuskens, and O. Brum. 2022. “video2619952182.” Artist interview. in Artist Interview - Recording, available on request.
   Google Scholar
• Roeck, C. 2021. Web Browser Characterisation, Emulation, and Preservation, 1–68. Dutch Digital Heritage Network.
   Google Scholar
• Roeck, C., R. Gieschke, K. Rechert, and J. Noordegraaf. 2019. “Preservation Strategies for an Internet-based Artwork Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.” In IPRES 2019: 16th International Conference of Digital Preservation: proceedings: Amsterdam 16–20 September 2019, edited by M. Ras, B. Sierman, and A. Puggioni, 179–190. Dutch Digital Heritage Network. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GF2U9
   Google Scholar
• Roeck, C., K. Rechert, and J. Noordegraaf. 2018. “Evaluation of Preservation Strategies for an Interactive, Software-Based Artwork with Complex Behavior Using the Case Study Horizons (2008) by Geert Mul.” In iPRES 2018 - Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects [207.4] Phaidra, Universität Wien. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2VPFT.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vall, R. 2023. “Theories of Time-Based Media Art Conservation: From Ontologies to Ecologies.” In Conservation of Time-Based Media Art, edited by D. Engel and J. Phillips, 13–27. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wijers, G. 2019. “Taking Care of Media Art in the Netherlands: A Brief History.” In A Critical History of Media Art in The Netherlands, edited by Sanneke Huisman and Marga van Mechelen, part II.3. Amsterdam: Jap Sam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wijers, G. 2020. Infrastructuur Duurzame Toegankelijkheid Digitale Kunst - Projectvoorstel. Amsterdam: LIMA.
   Google Scholar
• Wijers, G., J. Phillips, et al. 2022. “A Roundtable: Collaborating with Media Artists to Preserve their Art.” In Conservation of Time-Based Media Art, edited by D. Engel and J. Phillips, 249–266. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar