Get the Picture: Learning Referents in a Single-Day Context

References

• Ando, Misa, and Toshimune Kambara. 2023. “Japanese Written Pseudowords can be Conditioned to Japanese Spoken Words with Positive, Negative, and Active Emotions.” Cognitive Processing 24 (3): 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01138-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando, Misa, Xinyi Liu, Yan Yan, Yutao Yang, Shushi Namba, Kazuaki Abe, and Toshimune Kambara. 2021. “Sound-symbolic Semantics of Written Japanese Vowels in a Paper-Based Survey Study.” Frontiers in Communication 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.617532.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, Alan, Costanza Papagno, and Giuseppe Vallar. 1988. “When Long-Term Learning Depends on Short-Term Storage.” Journal of Memory and Language 27 (5): 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90028-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, Viridiana L., Daniel Yurovsky, and Linda B. Smith. 2016. “Competition between Multiple Words for a Referent in Cross-situational Word Learning.” Journal of Memory and Language 90: 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermúdez-Margaretto, Beatriz, David Beltrán, Fernando Cuetos, and Alberto Domínguez. 2018. “Brain Signatures of New (Pseudo-) Words: Visual Repetition in Associative and Non-associative Contexts.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, Caterina, Andreas Jansen, Michael Deppe, Ann-Freya Foerster, Jens Sommer, Thomas Wolbers, and Stefan Knecht. 2005. “Hippocampus Activity Differentiates Good from Poor Learners of a Novel Lexicon.” Neuroimage 25 (3): 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, Caterina, Pienie Zwitserlood, Meinou H. de Vries, Christiane Feldhues, Stefan Knecht, and Christian Dobel. 2007. “Five Days Versus a Lifetime: Intense Associative Vocabulary Training Generates Lexically Integrated Words.” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 25 (5-6): 493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccola, Brian, Isabelle Dautriche, and Emmanuel Chemla. 2018. “Competition and Symmetry in an Artificial Word Learning Task.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Shana K., and Frank E. Mueller. 2013. “The Effects of Interleaving Versus Blocking on Foreign Language Pronunciation Learning.” Memory & Cognition 41 (5): 671–682. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0291-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicero, Scott D., and Warren W. Tryron. 1989. “Classical Conditioning of Meaning—II. A Replication and Triplet Associative Extension.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 20 (3): 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(89)90023-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, James M., and Allan Paivio. 1991. “Dual Coding Theory and Education.” Educational Psychology Review 3 (3): 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, Katri, Matti Laine, Kati Renvall, Timo Saarinen, Nadine Martin, and Riitta Salmelin. 2004. “Learning New Names for New Objects: Cortical Effects as Measured by Magnetoencephalography.” Brain and Language 89 (3): 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosper, Samuel H., Claudia Männel, and Jutta L. Mueller. 2020. “In the Absence of Visual Input: Electrophysiological Evidence of Infants’ Mapping of Labels Onto Auditory Objects.” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 45: 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosper, Samuel H., Claudia Männel, and Jutta L. Mueller. 2022. “Mechanisms of Associative Word Learning: Benefits from the Visual Modality and Synchrony of Labeled Objects.” Cortex 152: 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuskley, Christine, Julia Simner, and Simon Kirby. 2017. Phonological and Orthographic Influences in the Bouba–Kiki Effect.” Psychological Research 81 (1): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0709-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cychosz, Margaret, Michelle Erskine, Benjamin Munson, and Jan Edwards. 2021. “A Lexical Advantage in Four-Year-Old Children’s Word Repetition.” Journal of Child Language 48 (1): 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davachi, Lila, Jason P. Mitchell, and Anthony D. Wagner. 2003. “Multiple Routes to Memory: Distinct Medial Temporal Lobe Processes Build Item and Source Memories.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (4): 2157–2162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337195100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Cüneyt. 2020. “Lexical and Structural Ambiguities in Student Writing: An Assessment and Evaluation of Results.” African Educational Research Journal 8 (3): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.8S3.20.077.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, Martin J. 2004. “Children’s Difficulty in Learning Homonyms.” Journal of Child Language 31 (1): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090300583X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Zoltan, and Stephen Ryan. 2015. The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eikerling, Maren Rebecca, Theresa Sophie Bloder, and Maria Luisa Lorusso. 2022. “A Nonword Repetition Task Discriminates Typically Developing Italian-German Bilingual Children from Bilingual Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Role of Language-Specific and Language-Non-specific Nonwords.” Frontiers in Psychology 13: 826540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C. 2008. “The Dynamics of Second Language Emergence: Cycles of Language Use, Language Change, and Language Acquisition.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (2): 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00716.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, Susan E. 2006. “Nonword Repetition and Word Learning: The Nature of the Relationship.” Applied Psycholinguistics 27 (4): 513–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, Susan E., and Alan D. Baddeley. 1989. “Evaluation of the Role of Phonological STM in the Development of Vocabulary in Children: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Memory and Language 28 (2): 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90044-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, Susan E., and Alan D. Baddeley. 1990. “Phonological Memory Deficits in Language Disordered Children: Is There a Causal Connection?” Journal of Memory and Language 29 (3): 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90004-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, Robert L. 1996. “Isolated and Interrelated Concepts.” Memory & Cognition 24 (5): 608–628. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönholm, Petra, Juha O. Rinne, Victor Vorobyev, and Matti Laine. 2005. “Naming of Newly Learned Objects: A PET Activation Study.” Cognitive Brain Research 25 (1): 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havas, Viktória, J. S. H. Taylor, Lucía Vaquero, Ruth de Diego-Balaguer, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, and Matthew H. Davis. 2018. “Semantic and Phonological Schema Influence Spoken Word Learning and Overnight Consolidation.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6): 1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1329325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Erin, Duncan E. Astle, and Kathleen Rastle. 2015. “Semantic Advantage for Learning New Phonological Form Representations.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27 (4): 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Erin A., and Kathleen Rastle. 2016. “How Does the Provision of Semantic Information Influence the Lexicalization of New Spoken Words?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (7): 1322–1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1079226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hino, Yasushi, Stephan J. Lupker, and Penny M. Pexman. 2002. “Ambiguity and Synonymy Effects in Lexical Decision, Naming, and Semantic Categorization Tasks: Interactions between Orthography, Phonology, and Semantics.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (4): 686–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirota, M. 1982. “Zukei no yuuimido to sono tokucho nitsuite: seigen rensouho ni yoru.” Ehime Daigaku Bungakubu Ronshu Bungakka Hen [The Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Literature Ehime University] 15: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, Rachael C., Daria Barsky, and Jennifer M. Rodd. 2019. “Incidental Learning and Long-Term Retention of New Word Meanings from Stories: The Effect of Number of Exposures.” Language Learning 69 (1): 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén, Annika, Minna Vihla, Matti Laine, and Riitta Salmelin. 2009. “Accessing Newly Learned Names and Meanings in the Native Language.” Human Brain Mapping 30 (3): 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Mutsumi, Sotaro Kita, Miho Nagumo, and Hiroyuki Okada. 2008. “Sound Symbolism Facilitates Early Verb Learning.” Cognition 109 (1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Mutsumi, Michiko Miyazaki, H. Henny Yeung, Shohei Hidaka, Katerina Kantartzis, Hiroyuki Okada, and Sotaro Kita. 2015. “Sound Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in 14-Month-Olds.” PLoS One 10 (2): e0116494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, Eun Hee, and Junko Yamashita. 2014. “L2 Reading Comprehension and its Correlates: A Meta-Analysis.” Language Learning 64 (1): 160–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E. 2014. “Experimental Paradigms in Psycholinguistics.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, edited by R. J. Podesva, and D. Sharma, 135–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kambara, Toshimune, Erik C. Brown, Jeong-Won Jeong, Noa Ofen, Yasuo Nakai, and Eishi Asano. 2017. “Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Working Memory Maintenance and Scanning of Verbal Information.” Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (6): 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambara, Toshimune, Erik C. Brown, Brian H. Silverstein, Yasuo Nakai, and Eishi Asano. 2018. “Neural Dynamics of Verbal Working Memory in Auditory Description Naming.” Scientific Reports 8 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33776-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kambara, Toshimune, Takashi Tsukiura, Yayoi Shigemune, Akitake Kanno, Rui Nouchi, Yukihito Yomogida, and Ryuta Kawashima. 2013. “Learning-dependent Changes of Associations between Unfamiliar Words and Perceptual Features: A 15-day Longitudinal Study.” Language Sciences 35: 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambara, Toshimune, and Tomotaka Umemura. 2021. “The Relationships between Initial Consonants in Japanese Sound Symbolic Words and Familiarity, Multi-sensory Imageability, Emotional Valence, and Arousal.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50 (4): 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09749-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, Katerina, Mutsumi Imai, and Sotaro Kita. 2011. “Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children.” Cognitive Science 35 (3): 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01169.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyanagi, Kyoji, Shinichi Ishikawa, Yukio Ohkubo, and Eisuke Ishii. 1960. “Nihongo san onsetsu meishi no jukuchika [The Familiarity Values of Japanese Three Letter Nouns].” Shinrigaku Kenkyu [The Japanese Journal of Psychology] 30: 357–365. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.30.357.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Hyung-Suk, Toshikatsu Fujii, Jiro Okuda, Takashi Tsukiura, Atsushi Umetsu, Maki Suzuki, Tatsuo Nagasaka, Shoki Takahashi, and Atsushi Yamadori. 2003. “Changes in Brain Activation Patterns Associated with Learning of Korean Words by Japanese: An fMRI Study.” NeuroImage 20 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00254-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Chengchen, Lin Fan, and Bo Wang. 2020. “Post-encoding Positive Emotion Impairs Associative Memory for English Vocabulary.” PLoS One 15 (4): e0228614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Zihan, Nan Wang, Yan Yan, and Toshimune Kambara. 2021. “Vowel Length Expands Perceptual and Emotional Evaluations in Written Japanese Sound-Symbolic Words.” Behavioral Sciences 11 (6): 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11060090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, Jared A., and Daniel J. Weiss. 2011. “Working Memory Predicts the Acquisition of Explicit L2 Knowledge.” In Implicit and Explicit Language Learning: Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism, edited by C. Sanz, and R. P. Leow, 101–114. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Xinyi, Hiroki Horinouchi, Yutao Yang, Yan Yan, Misa Ando, Ukwueze Jonah Obinna, Shushi Namba, and Toshimune Kambara. 2021. “Pictorial Referents Facilitate Recognition and Retrieval Speeds of Associations between Novel Words in a Second Language (L2) and Referents.” Frontiers in Communication 6: 605009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.605009.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Stuart, Jeffrey Stewart, and Aaron Olaf Batty. 2020. “Predicting L2 Reading Proficiency with Modalities of Vocabulary Knowledge: A Bootstrapping Approach.” Language Testing 37 (3): 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219898380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Tally McCormick, Timo Torsten Schmidt, Felix Blankenburg, and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2017. “Verbal Labels Facilitate Tactile Perception.” Cognition 171: 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, Fred, and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. 2020. “Cognitive-load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 29 (4): 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, Allan. 1964. “Generalization of Verbally Conditioned Meaning from Symbol to Referent.” Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 18 (2): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paivio, Allan. 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, Allan. 2007. Mind and its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, Kevin, Stuart McLean, Brandon Kramer, and Young Ae Kim. 2023. “The Counts of Dracula and Monte Cristo: Homonym Frequencies in Graded Readers.” Reading in a Foreign Language 35 (1): 48–71. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/67438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Hae In, Megan Solon, Carly Henderson, and Marzieh Dehghan-Chaleshtori. 2020. “The Roles of Working Memory and Oral Language Abilities in Elicited Imitation Performance.” The Modern Language Journal 104 (1): 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Ann M., and Eran Zaidel. 1980. “The Acquisition of Homonymy.” Cognition 8 (2): 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(80)90012-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, Penny M., Ian S. Hargreaves, Jodi D. Edwards, Luke C. Henry, and Bradley G. Goodyear. 2007. “The Neural Consequences of Semantic Richness.” Psychological Science 18 (5): 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01913.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, Penny M., Ian S. Hargreaves, Paul D. Siakaluk, Glen E. Bodner, and Jamie Pope. 2008. “There are Many Ways to be Rich: Effects of Three Measures of Semantic Richness on Visual Word Recognition.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (1): 161–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2003. The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodd, Jennifer M. 2018. “Lexical Ambiguity.” In Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd ed., edited by M. G. Gaskell, and S.-A. Rueschemeyer, 96–117. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.5.
   Google Scholar
• Service, Elisabet, and F. I. M. Craik. 1993. “Differences between Young and Older Adults in Learning a Foreign Vocabulary.” Journal of Memory and Language 32 (5): 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seufert, Tina. 2020. “Building Bridges between Self-regulation and Cognitive Load—An Invitation for a Broad and Differentiated Attempt.” Educational Psychology Review 32 (4): 1151–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09574-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, Carolyn K., and Arthur W. Staats. 1957. “Meaning Established by Classical Conditioning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (1): 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staats, Arthur W., and Carolyn K. Staats. 1958. “Attitudes Established by Classical Conditioning.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 57 (1): 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, Arthur W., Carolyn K. Staats, and William G. Heard. 1959. “Language Conditioning of Meaning Using a Semantic Generalization Paradigm.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (3): 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staats, Arthur W., Carolyn K. Staats, and William G. Heard. 1961. “Denotative Meaning Established by Classical Conditioning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4): 300–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046306.
   Google Scholar
• Staats, Arthur W., Carolyn K. Staats, William G. Heard, and L. P. Nims. 1959. “Replication Report: Meaning Established by Classical Conditioning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 57: 64. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark, Craig E. L., Peter J. Bayley, and Larry R. Squire. 2002. “Recognition Memory for Single Items and for Associations is Similarly Impaired Following Damage to the Hippocampal Region.” Learning & Memory 9 (5): 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.51802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Yuichi, Tatsuya Nakata, and Robert Dekeyser. 2019. “Optimizing Second Language Practice in the Classroom: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology.” The Modern Language Journal 103 (3): 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima, Atsuko, Iske Bakker, Janet G. Van Hell, Gabriele Janzen, and James M. McQueen. 2014. “Richness of Information about Novel Words Influences How Episodic and Semantic Memory Networks Interact during Lexicalization.” NeuroImage 84: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima, Atsuko, Iske Bakker, Janet G. Van Hell, Gabriele Janzen, and James M. McQueen. 2017. “Interaction between Episodic and Semantic Memory Networks in the Acquisition and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words.” Brain and Language 167: 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, Jakke, and M. Gareth Gaskell. 2006. “Learning New Words: Effects of Lexical Competition and Age of Acquisition.” Proc. of CogSci’06 28: 822–827.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura, Niina, Anne Castles, and Kate Nation. 2017. “Orthographic Learning, Fast and Slow: Lexical Competition Effects Reveal the Time Course of Word Learning in Developing Readers.” Cognition 163: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer, Angela K., Gordon Winocur, Fergus IM Craik, and Morris Moscovitch. 1999. “Source Memory and Divided Attention: Reciprocal Costs to Primary and Secondary Tasks.” Neuropsychology 13 (4): 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.13.4.467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryon, Warren W., and Scott D. Cicero. 1989. “Classical Conditioning of Meaning—I. A Replication and Higher-Order Extension.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 20 (2): 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(89)90046-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turriziani, Patrizia, Lucia Fadda, Carlo Caltagirone, and Giovanni A. Carlesimo. 2002. “Recognition Memory for Single Items and for Associations in Amnesic Patients.” Neuropsychologia 42 (4): 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanek, Norbert, Márton Sóskuthy, and Asifa Majid. 2021. “Consistent Verbal Labels Promote Odor Category Learning.” Cognition 206: 104485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihman, Marilyn M. 2022. “The Developmental Origins of Phonological Memory.” Psychological Review (online). https://doi.org/10.1037/rev000035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, Nikola, Brian Hansen, Torben Ellegaard Lund, Sune Jespersen, and Yury Shtyrov. 2021. “Rapid Microstructural Plasticity in the Cortical Semantic Network Following a Short Language Learning Session.” PLoS Biology 19 (6): e3001290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z. E. 2016. “Working Memory and Second Language Research.” In Working Memory and Second Language Learning, edited by Z. E. Wen, 59–76. Bristol; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095735.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Z. E., and J. Schwieter. 2022. “Towards an Integrated Account of Working Memory and Language.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language, edited by J. Schwieter, and Z. Wen, 909–927. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witherby, Amber E., and Shana K. Carpenter. 2022. “The Rich-get-Richer Effect: Prior Knowledge Predicts New Learning of Domain-Relevant Information.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 48 (4): 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Yan, Yutao Yang, Misa Ando, Xinyi Liu, and Toshimune Kambara. 2021. “Multisensory Connections of Novel Linguistic Stimuli in Japanese as a Native Language and Referential Tastes.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 11 (3): 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Yutao, Yan Yan, Misa Ando, Xinyi Liu, and Toshimune Kambara. 2021. “Associative Learning of New Word Forms in a First Language (L1) and Haptic Referents in a Single-Day Experiment.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 11 (2): 616–626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11020044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, Melvin J., Penny M. Pexman, Michele Wellsby, Ian S. Hargreaves, and Mark J. Huff. 2012. “An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 72. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Aiqing, and Guy Trainin. 2022. “A Meta-Analysis Examining Technology-Assisted L2 Vocabulary Learning.” ReCALL 34 (2): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar