Using a model of domain learning to understand the development of creativity

References

• Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2018). The creative problem finding hierarchy: A suggested model for understanding problem finding. Creativity, 5(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0019
   Google Scholar
• Abdulla, A. M., Paek, S. H., Cramond, B., & Runco, M. A. (2020). Problem finding and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agassi, J. (2012). Science and society: Studies in the sociology of science. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213–250). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008010
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (2004-14902-009; pp. 273–298). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2005). The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(4), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3704_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2013). In praise of (reasoned and reasonable) speculation: A response to Robinson et al.’s moratorium on recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9234-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2016). Relational thinking and relational reasoning: Harnessing the power of patterning. NPJ Science of Learning, 1(1), 16004. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2020). The future of strategy theory, research, and implementation: Roads less traveled. In D. L. Dinsmore, L. K. Fryer, & M. M. Parkinson (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis (pp. 406–423). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429423635/chapters/10.4324/9780429423635-25
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2023). Creating a motivating learning environment: Guiding principles from philosophy, psychology, and pedagogy. In M. Bong, S.-I. Kim, & J. Reeve (Eds.), Motivation science: Controversies and insights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in the processing of text. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01761832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1999). Learner profiles: Valuing individual differences within classroom communities. In Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 413–436). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10315-018
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Sperl, C. T., Buehl, M. M., Fives, H., & Chiu, S. (2004). Modeling domain learning: Profiles from the field of special education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Latency predicts category switch in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asquith, S. L., Wang, X., Quintana, D. S., & Abraham, A. (2022). Predictors of creativity in young people: Using frequentist and Bayesian approaches in estimating the importance of individual and contextual factors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000322.supp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534371
   Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3-13, 43(4), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Bruckdorfer, R., & Jauk, E. (2020). Motives for creativity: Exploring the what and why of everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Karstendiek, M., Ceh, S. M., Grabner, R. H., Krammer, G., Lebuda, I., Silvia, P. J., Cotter, K. N., Li, Y., Hu, W., Martskvishvili, K., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here”? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (2006-08155-017; pp. 316–332). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606915.019
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2010). Creativity and art: Three roads to surprise. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042004697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). Selective benefits of question self-generation and answering for remembering expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. A., Jaffe, A., & Wiles, A. (2006). The Millennium Prize Problems. American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Celume, M.-P., & Zenasni, F. (2022). How perspective-taking underlies creative thinking and the socio-emotional competency in trainings of drama pedagogy. Estudos de Psicologia, 39. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202239e200015
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., & Schunn, C. (2015). The impact of analogies on creative concept generation: lessons from an in vivo study in engineering design. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, N., & Schultetus, R. S. (2000). Knowledge and expertise. In F. T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (2000-07149-003; pp. 57–81). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, C. J., & Berger, R. (2010). Ethics of celebrities and their increasing influence in 21st century society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (2014). The nature of expertise. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799681
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Weisberg, S. M., Dai, T., Newcombe, N. S., Schunn, C. D., Massey, C., & Merlino, F. J. (2016). Improving middle school science learning using diagrammatic reasoning. Science Education, 100(6), 1184–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza, G. E., & Lubart, T. (2021). Intelligence and creativity: Mapping constructs on the space-time continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, M. A. (1984). Terence Tao. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(3), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312075
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding in art. In The foundations of aesthetics, art, & art education (pp. 91–116). Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2019). Types of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1517-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vink, I. C., Willemsen, R. H., Lazonder, A. W., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2022). Creativity in mathematics performance: The role of divergent and convergent thinking. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), e12459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp.369–399). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14343-017
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D., Peterson, E., & Dumas, D. (2016). Learning to study strategically. In R. Mayer and P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 223–248). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736419-18
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, D. (2020). Strategic processing within and across domains of learning. In Handbook of strategies and strategic processing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Organisciak, P., Eby, D., Grajzel, K., Vlaamster, T., Newman, M., & Carrera, M. (2022). What makes children’s responses to creativity assessments difficult to judge reliably? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(3), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Doherty, M., & Organisciak, P. (2020). The psychology of professional and student actors: Creativity, personality, and motivation. PLoS One, 15(10), e0240728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Dong, Y., & Doherty, M. (2021). The influence of creative expertise on the sensitivity and selectivity of analogical reasoning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Dong, Y., & Leveling, M. (2021). The zone of proximal creativity: What dynamic assessment of divergent thinking reveals about students’ latent class membership. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., & Grossnickle, E. M. (2013). Relational reasoning and its manifestations in the educational context: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 391–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9224-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., Baker, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Relational reasoning in medical education: Patterns in discourse and diagnosis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Doherty, M. (2021). Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., McNeish, D., & Greene, J. A. (2020). Dynamic measurement: A theoretical–psychometric paradigm for modern educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1744150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In Creative thought (pp. 461–493). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-017
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & Baker, L. M. (1994). Goals, analogy, and the social constraints of scientific discovery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(3), 538–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00035779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (2012-08871-035; pp. 701–718). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (1996-98355-008; pp. 227–253). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10 Suppl), S70–S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Recent advances in expertise research: A commentary on the contributions to the special issue. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2009). Toward a science of exceptional achievement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1172(1), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1393.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A., & Benveniste, M. (2022). A new method for training creativity: Narrative as an alternative to divergent thinking. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1512(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Oyebade, O., Ojo, A., Günther, F., & Holling, H. (2019). Application of latent semantic analysis to divergent thinking is biased by elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Leveling, M., Dong, Y., & Dumas, D. (2020). Investigating the quantity–quality relationship in scientific creativity: An empirical examination of expected residual variance and the tilted funnel hypothesis. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2497–2518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03571-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., & Dumas, D. (2021). Testing equal odds in creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, L., DeCaro, M. S., & Ramirez, G. (2019). The lure of seductive details during lecture learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, E., Elbich, D. B., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Chen, Q., Kane, M. J., Silvia, P. J., Seli, P., & Beaty, R. E. (2021). Intelligence and creativity share a common cognitive and neural basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 150(4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000958.supp
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., Alexander, P. A., Gillingham, M. G., Kulikowich, J. M., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. (1995). Expert knowledge and the processes of thinking. In Subject learning in the primary curriculum (pp.271–285). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203990247-32
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2009). Living in alternative and inner worlds: Early signs of acting talent. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. E. (2010). Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2017). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition, 166, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattan, C., & Alexander, P. A. (2020). Prior knowledge and its activation in elementary classroom discourse. Reading and Writing, 33(6), 1617–1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, R. W. (2009). Individual differences in expertise development over decades in a complex intellectual domain. Memory & Cognition, 37(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.2.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A. J., Velazquez, M. N., Dawdanow, A., & Shipley, T. F. (2018). Sketching and summarizing to reduce memory for seductive details in science text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janosov, M., Battiston, F., & Sinatra, R. (2020). Success and luck in creative careers. EPJ Data Science, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00227-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Analogy and the exercise of creativity. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 313–331). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.015
   Google Scholar
• Kalra, P. B., & Richland, L. E. (2022). Relational reasoning: A foundation for higher cognition based on abstraction. Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(2), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., Brzeski, A., Czerwonka, M., Gajda, A., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Delving into creativity and learning. In V. Glaveanu, I. Ness, & C. de Sait Laurent (Eds.) Creative learning in digital and virtual environments. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Butterfuss, R., Van Boekel, M., & O’Brien, E. J. (2017). Integrating relational reasoning and knowledge revision during reading. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9381-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Christensen, M., Kim, S.-I., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottmeyer, A. M., Van Meter, P. N., & Cameron, C. E. (2020). The role of representational system in relational reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Friedman, S., Christiaans, E., & Robinson, K. A. (2022). Valuable but costly? University students’ expectancy-value-cost profiles in introductory chemistry courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use. Educational Psychologist, 54(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Du, H. (2021). Reasoning beyond history: Examining students’ strategy use when completing a multiple text task addressing a controversial topic in education. Reading and Writing, 34(4), 1003–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10095-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Campos Oaxaca, G. S., Lee, E., Du, H., & Lee, H. Y. (2021). Examining perceptions, selections, and products in undergraduates’ learning from multiple resources. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1555–1584. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In The creative cognition approach (pp. 271–302). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M. (2018). What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese, 195(2), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1236-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Brufau, R., & Berná, J. C. (2021). Foraging for new ideas: Search and research in divergent thinking tasks. Creativity Research Journal, 33(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1888518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Todd, E. M. (2019). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2002). What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209599506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Firetto, C. M., & Greene, J. A. (2017). Enriching students’ scientific thinking through relational reasoning: Seeking evidence in texts, tasks, and talk. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creativity in the workplace: People, problems, and structures. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, W. R., & Torrance, E. P. (1974). Creative reading and the questioning abilities of young children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 8(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1974.tb01104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Assessment of 21st Century Skills. In Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32690/
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmiero, M., Fusi, G., Crepaldi, M., Borsa, V. M., & Rusconi, M. L. (2022). Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: A state-of-the-art review. Cognitive Processing, 23(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S. L., Cherng, B. L., Chen, H. C., & Lin, Y. Y. (2013). A model of contextual and personal motivations in creativity: How do the classroom goal structures influence creativity via self-determination motivations? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planck, M. (2014). Scientific autobiography: And other papers. Open Road Media. (Original work published 1948)
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Dow, G. T. (2010). Attitude change as the precursor to creativity enhancement. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Program for International Student Assessment. (2022). PISA 2022 creative thinking. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/creative-thinking/.
   Google Scholar
• Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (2019). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). Introduction to special issue: The psychology of creativity and innovation in the workplace. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M. (2021). Creative productive giftedness in women: Their paths to eminence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (2021-36873-018; pp. 317–334). Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_18
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, A. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. (2016). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Penguin Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Abdulla Alabbasi, A. M., Acar, S., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2022). Creative potential is differentially expressed in school, at home, and the natural environment. Creativity Research Journal, 35(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2031437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., & Rotgans, J. I. (2021). Epistemic curiosity and situational interest: Distant cousins or identical twins? Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09539-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunn, C. D. (2017). Building from in vivo research to the future of research on relational thinking and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9384-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanteau, J., & Weiss, D. J. (2014). Individual expertise versus domain expertise. The American Psychologist, 69(7), 711–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2013). Interested experts, confused novices: Art expertise and the knowledge emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.31.1.f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1983). Formal education, eminence and dogmatism: The curvilinear relationship. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 17(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1983.tb00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (1996-98355-008; pp. 227–253). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20(2), 283–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2003). Expertise, competence, and creative ability. In R. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.) The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 213–240). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(3), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.3.160
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2010-21837-009; pp. 174–188). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.012
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2017). Big-C versus little-c creativity: Definitions, implications, and inherent educational contradictions. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2018). Genius, creativity and leadership: A half-century journey through science, history, mathematics, and psychology. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (2018-17427-020; pp. 302–317). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108185936.022
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A. L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aaf5239. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1940). General formal education by field of eminence. Scientific Monthly, New York, 50, 544–557.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of positive educational leadership comprising wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Educational Psychology Review, 17(3), 191–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-5617-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C., Baas, M., & van der Maas, H. (2021). A Minimal Theory of Creative Ability. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). Differentiated instruction. In Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 197–210). Prufrock Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (2003). Reflection on emerging insights on the educational psychology of creativity. In J. Houtz (Ed.), The educational psychology of creativity (2003-00445-012; pp. 273–286). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1992). A national climate for creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 15(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621759201500103
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J., Wu, A. H., Bråten, I., & Wang, C. Y. (2022). What do critical reading strategies look like? Eye-tracking and lag sequential analysis reveal attention to data and reasoning when reading conflicting information. Computers & Education, 187, 104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, G. S. E., van Gog, T., Jansen, E., Pleijsant, M., & Kester, L. (2021). Multimedia effects during retrieval practice: Images that reveal the answer reduce vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1587–1608. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O. (2018). Openness to experience: Insights from personality neuroscience. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (2018-03511-026; pp. 464–475). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.027
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (2003). Creativity and talent. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. A. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (2003-02621-028; pp. 371–380). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, S. E., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/747599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children.
   Google Scholar
• Zielińska, A., Forthmann, B., Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2023). Self-regulation for creative activity: The same or different across domains? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2023, 540. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000540
   Google Scholar