When the Medium Is the Message: A Meta-Analysis of Creative Media Advertising Effects

References

• Benway, Jan Panero. 1998. “Banner Blindness: The Irony of Attention Grabbing on the World Wide Web.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 42 (5):463–7. doi:10.1177/154193129804200504.
   Google Scholar
• Bijmolt, Tammo H. A., and Rik G. M. Pieters. 2001. “Meta-Analysis in Marketing When Studies Contain Multiple Measurements.” Marketing Letters 12 (2):157–69. doi:10.1023/A:1011117103381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlander, Suzanne. 2017. “The Battle between Creative and Traditional Media: An Experiment of the Effects of Creative Media and Traditional Media on Consumer Responses.” Master’s thesis. University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Margaret C., and Kevin Lane Keller. 2003. “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2):292–304. 10.1086/376800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannes Lions. 2022. “Pharma, Health & Wellness, Outdoor, Print & Publishing and Design Lions Winners.” https://www.canneslions.com/about/news/day1-lions-winners
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Micael. 2005a. “The Medium as a Contextual Cue: Effects of Creative Media Choice.” Journal of Advertising 34 (3):89–98. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Micael. 2005b. “A Rhetorical Question: What is the Impact of Non-Traditional Media for Low- and High-Reputation Brands?” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 31 (2):13–23. doi:10.1080/10641734.2009.10505263.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Micael, and Mats Edenius. 2007. “When is Advertising Advertising? Comparing Responses to Non-Traditional and Traditional Advertising Media.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 29 (1):33–42. doi:10.1080/10641734.2007.10505206.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Micael, Lars Friberg, and Erik Nilsson. 2009. “Long Live Creative Media Choice: The Medium as a Persistent Brand Cue.” Journal of Advertising 38 (2):121–9. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, Micael, Anton Granlund, and Mikael Grenros. 2009. “The Consumer-Perceived Value of Non-Traditional Media: Effects of Brand Reputation, Appropriateness and Expense.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 26 (3):155–63. doi:10.1108/07363760910954091.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlke, Jeffrey A., and Breton M. Wiernik. 2019. “Psychmeta: An R Package for Psychometric Meta-Analysis Program Description.” Applied Psychological Measurement 43 (5):415–6. doi:10.1177/0146621618795933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, William K., and Jeen-Su Lim. 2022. “Advertising Creativity and Its Effects: A Meta-Analysis of the Moderating Role of Modality.” Marketing Letters. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11002-022-09627-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, Kevin. 2016. “The Creative Media Puzzle: The Mechanism of Elaboration and Congruence Resolution.” Master’s thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, Femke J. 2018. “More Plastic than Fish in the Sea by 2050. Will Advertising Be the Solution? The Effects of Ambient Advertising on Attitudes and Recycling Behavior.” Master’s thesis, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Dens, Nathalie, Partick De Pelsmacker, Peter Goos, Leonids Aleksandrovs, and David Martens. 2018. “How Consumers’ Media Usage Creates Synergy in Advertising Campaigns.” International Journal of Market Research 60 (3):268–87. doi:10.1177/1470785317751333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eelen, Jiska, Fabiënne Rauwers, Verena M. Wottrich, Hilde A. M. Voorveld, and Guda van Noort. 2016. “Consumer Responses to Creative Media Advertising: A Literature Review.” In Advertising in New Formats and Media: Current Research and Implications for Marketers, edited by Patrick De Pelsmacker, 19–46. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. doi:10.1108/978-1-78560-313-620151001
   Google Scholar
• Eelen, Jiska, and Roxana Seiler. 2016. “Creative Media Use Increases Online Sharing of Your Ad (But Seems Less Effective for Your Brand).” In Volume 6 of Advances in Advertising Research, edited by Peeter W. J. Verlegh, Hilde A. M. Voorveld, and Martin Eisend, 291–308. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7_23
   Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin. 2017. “Meta-Analysis in Advertising Research.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1):21–35. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1210064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin, and Farid Tarrahi. 2014. “Meta-Analysis Selection Bias in Marketing Research.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 31 (3):317–26. doi:10.1016/J.IJRESMAR.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin, and Farid Tarrahi. 2016. “The Effectiveness of Advertising: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Advertising Inputs and Outcomes.” Journal of Advertising 45 (4):519–31. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1185981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, Marieke L., Edith G. Smit, and Peeter W. J. Verlegh. 2015. “Strategies and Motives for Resistance to Persuasion: An Integrative Framework.” Frontiers in Psychology 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friends of Cancer Patients. 2009. “Beach Towel.”
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, Marian, and Peter Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):1–31. doi:10.1086/209380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, Lily. 2016. “Alternative Advertising: Strategies Exploring Outcome Effects of Creative Media Advertising.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Heineken. 2021. “Shutter Ads.”
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Li, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Katharina. 2015. “Unusual Location and Unexpected Execution in Advertising: A Content Analysis and Test of Effectiveness in Ambient Advertisements.” Journal of Marketing Communications 21 (1):33–47. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.970823.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Katharina, and Stefan Hoffmann. 2011. “Guerilla Marketing: The Nature of the Concept and Propositions for Further Research.” Asian Journal of Marketing 5 (2):39–54. doi:10.3923/ajm.2011.39.54.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Katharina, and Stefan Hoffmann. 2014. “Surprise, Surprise. Ambient Media as Promotion Tool for Retailers.” Journal of Retailing 90 (1):93–110. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2013.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, Suzanne. 2015. Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• John, Deborah Roedder, and John C. Whitney. Jr. 1986. “The Development of Consumer Knowledge in Children: A Cognitive Structure Approach.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (4):406–17. doi:10.1086/208526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurca, Maria-Alina, Andreea-Ioana Romonţi-Maniu, and Monica-Maria Zaharie. 2013. “New Empirical Insights into Advertising Creativity – Traditional/Non-Traditional Media Context.” Marketing - From Information to Decision 6:92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Daniel. 1960. “The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (2):163–204. doi:10.1086/266945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keldermans, Maja, and Tim Smits. 2017. “Onverwacht Advertentiemedium en de Rol Van Productcongruentie.” Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap 45 (3):201–15. doi:10.5117/2017.045.003.005.
   Google Scholar
• Koedijk, Tim J. 2016. “Does Creativity Really Matter? An Experimental Study on the Effects of Creative Media Choice and the Role of Brand Familiarity in Improving Brand Attitude and Brand Image.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Koerselman, Lily. 2014. “Dare to Challenge Consumers’ Assumptions: Unexpected Traditional vs. novel Advertising.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Eun Sook, Greg Nyilasy, Karen Whitehill King, and Leonard N. Reid. 2021. “Putting Things into Context: A Meta-Analysis of Media Context Effects on Attitudinal Outcomes.” Journal of Advertising 50 (3):330–47. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1895920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, Dean, Julian P. T. Higgins, Dan Jackson, Jack Bowden, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, and Mark Simmonds. 2019. “A Comparison of Heterogeneity Variance Estimators in Simulated Random‐Effects Meta‐Analyses.” Research Synthesis Methods 10 (1):83–98. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, Jay Conrad, Jeannie Levinson, and Amy Levinson. 2007. Guerrilla Marketing: Easy and Inexpensive Strategies for Making Big Profits from Your Small Business. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, Rebecca, Phil Maguire, and Mark T. Keane. 2011. “Making Sense of Surprise: An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Surprise Judgments.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37 (1):176–86. doi:10.1037/a0021609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, Rosalinda. 2017. “Creative Media Advertising is It Really Better?” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Marijn H. C., Jiska Eelen, and Hilde A. M. Voorveld. 2016. Creative Media Advertising. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Commerciële Communicatie.
   Google Scholar
• Modig, Erik, Micael Dahlén, and Jonas Colliander. 2014. “Consumer-Perceived Signals of ‘Creative’ versus ‘Efficient’ Advertising: Investigating the Roles of Expense and Effort.” International Journal of Advertising 33 (1):137–54. doi:10.2501/IJA-33-1-137-154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlang, Eveline R. 2015. “The Perfect Recipe: A Handful of Creativity and a Dash of Surprise. An Experimental Study on the Effects of Creative Media Choice and the Mediating Role of Surprise to Improve Donor Registrations.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Noordewier, Marret K., Sascha Topolinski, and Eric van Dijk. 2016. “The Temporal Dynamics of Surprise.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10 (3):136–49. doi:10.1111/spc3.12242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2013. “The Relative Persuasiveness of Different Message Types Does Not Vary as a Function of the Persuasive Outcome Assessed: Evidence from 29 Meta-Analyses of 2,062 Effect Sizes for 13 Message Variations.” Annals of the International Communication Association 37 (1):221–49. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679151.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, Selam Yiğit. 2019. “The Effect of Guerrilla Advertising on Consumer’s Ad Attitude and Purchase Intention: A Study on Well-Known Brands.” Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Palmatier, Robert W., Rajiv P. Dant, Dhruv Grewal, and Kenneth R. Evans. 2006. “Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Marketing 70 (4):136–53. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, Myrthe A. 2016. “Memory in Creative Media Advertising: The Effect of Creative Media Advertising on Associations, Top of Mind Awareness, Recall and Recognition and the Moderating Effect of Brand Familiarity.” Master’s thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rauwers, Fabiënne, Paola Remmelswaal, Marieke L. Fransen, Micael Dahlén, and Guda van Noort. 2018. “The Impact of Creative Media Advertising on Consumer Responses: Two Field Experiments.” International Journal of Advertising 37 (5):749–68. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1480167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauwers, Fabiënne, and Guda Van Noort. 2016. “The Underlying Processes of Creative Media Advertising.” In Volume 6 of Advances in Advertising Research, edited by Peeter W. J. Verlegh, Hilde A. M. Voorveld, and Martin Eisend, 309–23. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, Sara, Martin Eisend, Scott Koslow, and Micael Dahlén. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works.” Journal of Marketing 84 (6):39–56. doi:10.1177/0022242920929288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, Sara, Erik Modig, and Micael Dahlén. 2015. “The Value of Ambient Communication from a Consumer Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Communications 21 (1):20–32. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.970825.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Yves. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, David E. 1980. “Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition.” In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education, edited by R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer, 33–58. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315107493-4
   Google Scholar
• Sasser, Sheila L., and Scott Koslow. 2008. “Desperately Seeking Advertising Creativity: Engaging an Imaginative ‘3Ps’ Research Agenda.” Journal of Advertising 37 (4):5–20. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Frank L., and John E. Hunter. 2014. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schoppers, Roeland. 2014. “Creative Media Use for Health Communications: Intended and Unintended Persuasive Effects and the Role of Attitude toward the Ad.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., and Martin Eisend. 2019. “A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness: Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms.” Journal of Advertising 48 (3):313–32. doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1604009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler, Roxana. 2013. “‘Have You Seen This Cool Ad?’ Willingness to Share and the Impact of Individual Personality Traits regarding Creative Media Advertising.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, Avi, and Brett Horton. 1999. “Ambient Media: Advertising’s New Media Opportunity?” International Journal of Advertising 18 (3):305–21. doi:10.1080/02650487.1999.11104763.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Robert E., Scott B. MacKenzie, Xiaojing Yang, Laura M. Buchholz, and William K. Darley. 2007. “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising.” Marketing Science 26 (6):819–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40057228. 10.1287/mksc.1070.0272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, Jonathan A. C., and Matthias Egger. 2005. “Regression Methods to Detect Publication and Other Bias in Meta-Analysis.” In Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, edited by Hannah R. Rothstein, Alexander J. Sutton, and Michael Borenstein, 99–110. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch6 10.1002/0470870168
   Google Scholar
• Van Berlo, Zeph M. C., Eva A. van Reijmersdal, and Martin Eisend. 2021. “The Gamification of Branded Content: A Meta-Analysis of Advergame Effects.” Journal of Advertising 50 (2):179–96. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1858462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berlo, Zeph M. C., Eva A. van Reijmersdal, and Esther Rozendaal. 2020. “Adolescents and Handheld Advertising: The Roles of Brand Familiarity and Smartphone Attachment in the Processing of Mobile Advergames.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 19 (5):438–49. doi:10.1002/cb.1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mulken, Margot, Rob Le Pair, and Charles Forceville. 2010. “The Impact of Perceived Complexity, Deviation and Comprehension on the Appreciation of Visual Metaphor in Advertising across Three European Countries.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12):3418–30. doi:10.1016/J.PRAGMA.2010.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Osselaer, Stijn M. J., and Chris Janiszewski. 2001. “Two Ways of Learning Brand Associations.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2):202–23. doi:10.1086/322898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, Kelly, Virginia Beal, and Jenni Romaniuk. 2016. “Can Brand Users Really Remember Advertising More than Nonusers? Testing an Empirical Generalization across Six Advertising Awareness Measures.” Journal of Advertising Research 56 (3):311–20. doi:10.2501/JAR-2016-037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velsen, Anna. 2016. “Resistance is Futile: The Effect of Creative Media Advertising (CMA) on Attitudinal Responses and Behavioral Intentions through Perceived Persuasive Intent (PPI) and Resistance.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, Wolfgang. 2010. “Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the Metafor.” Journal of Statistical Software 36 (3):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkerink, Jordie. 2013. “Effortful Thinking’ in Creative Media Choice: The Moderating Role of Multitasking and Need for Cognition on Implicit and Explicit Brand Associations.” Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Warner Bros. Canada. 2011. “Contagion - Bacteria Billboard.”
   Google Scholar
• Wottrich, Verena. M., and Hilde A. M. Voorveld. 2016. “Creative vs. traditional Media Choice: Effects on Word-of-Mouth and Purchase Intention.” In Volume 6 of Advances in Advertising Research, edited by Peeter W. J. Verlegh, Hilde A. M. Voorveld, and Martin Eisend, 325–35. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7_25
   Google Scholar