Are Concave Ads More Persuasive? The Role of Immersion

References

• Aron, A., E. N. Aron, M. Tudor, and G. Nelson. 1991. “Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (2):241–53. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertamini, M. 2001. “The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity When Judging Position.” Perception 30 (11):1295–310. doi:10.1068/p3197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boush, D. M., M. Friestad, and G. M. Rose. 1994. “Adolescent Skepticism Toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):165–75. doi:10.1086/209390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechman, J. M., and S. C. Purvis. 2015. “Narrative, Transportation and Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 34 (2):366–81. doi:10.1080/02650487.2014.994803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calfee, J. E., and D. J. Ringold. 1994. “The 70% Majority: Enduring Consumer Beliefs about Advertising.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 13 (2):228–38. doi:10.1177/074391569401300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., and C. R. Taylor. 2020. “The Role of Ambiguity and Skepticism in the Effectiveness of Sustainability Labeling.” Journal of Business Research 120:379–88. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. 2004. “Imagine Yourself in the Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion.” Journal of Advertising 33 (2):37–48. doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. 2007. “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (4):421–9. doi:10.1086/510216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, G. T., D. B. Smith, and J. L. Swasy. 1990. “Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (4):433–41. doi:10.1086/209228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., and T. C. Brock. 2000. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5):701–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, N., and B. Burgess. 2007. “Territoriality: Seat Preferences in Different Types of Classroom Arrangements.” Environment and Behavior 39 (6):859–76. doi:10.1177/0013916506298798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S. J. G. Ahn, E. S. Kwon, and L. N. Reid. 2017. “TV Advertising Engagement as a State of Immersion and Presence.” Journal of Business Research 76:67–76. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogo, N., and J. Wagemans. 2013. “The “Side” Matters: How Configurality Is Reflected in Completion.” Cognitive Neuroscience 4 (1):31–45. doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.727387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M., J. Baek, and D. Y. Ju. 2018. “Anthropomorphic Design: Emotional Perception for Deformable Object.” Frontiers in Psychology 9:1829. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., and H. Patel. 2002. “Health and Safety Implications of Virtual Reality: A Review of Empirical Evidence.” Applied Ergonomics 33 (3):251–71. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C., and E. R. Spangenberg. 1998. “Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism toward Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 7 (2):159–86. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03
   Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C., E. Spangenberg, and D. L. MacLachlan. 2005. “Ad Skepticism: The Consequences of Disbelief.” Journal of Advertising 34 (3):7–17. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J., and E. F. McQuarrie. 2010. “Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 37 (3):368–92. doi:10.1086/653087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40 (3):879–91. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, S. B., and K. A. Carlson. 2014. “When Three Charms but Four Alarms: Identifying the Optimal Number of Claims in Persuasion Settings.” Journal of Marketing 78 (1):127–39. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. 1997. “Persuasion Processes across Receiver Goals and Message Genres.” Communication Theory 7 (2):125–48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., M. P. Zanna, and G. T. Fong. 2005. “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6):845–51. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laer, T., K. De Ruyter, L. M. Visconti, and M. Wetzels. 2014. “The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Narrative Transportation.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5):797–817. doi:10.1086/673383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Fieandt, K. 1949. “Das Phänomenologische Problem Von Licht Und Schatten [The Phenomenological Problem of Light and Shadow].” Acta Psychologica 6:337–57. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(49)90014-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yonas, A., and H. R. Jr. Pick. 1975. “An Approach to the Study of Infant Space Perception.” In Infant Perception: From Sensation to Cognition, edited by L. B. Cohen & P. Salapatek, vol. 2, 3–31. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar