Puzzle Pictures: A Study on Reversible Figures in Advertising

References

• Alpert, Frank H., and Michael A. Kamins. 1995. “An Empirical Investigation of Consumer Memory, Attitude, and Perceptions toward Pioneer and Follower Brands.” Journal of Marketing 59 (4): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, Jeremiah W. 2021. “Improving the Statistical Power and Reliability of Research Using Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Accounting Horizons 35 (4): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-18-052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergum, Judith E., and Bruce O. Bergum. 1979. “Self-Perceived Creativity and Ambiguous Figure Reversal Rates.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (5): 373–374. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329483
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, Daniel E. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, Edwin G. 1930. “A New Ambiguous Figure.” The American Journal of Psychology 42 (3): 444–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/1415447
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomás, and Adrian Furnham. 2007. “The ARTistic Personality.” Psychologist 20 (2): 84–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Michael, Panfeng Hu, and Macau K. F. Mak. 2022. “Mediation Analysis and Warranted Inferences in Media and Communication Research: Examining Research Design in Communication Journals from 1996 to 2017.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 99 (2): 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020961519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joel B., and Kunal Basu. 1987. “Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (4): 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1086/209081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingena, Marian. 1994. The Creation of Meaning in Advertising: Interaction of Figurative Advertising and Individual Differences in Processing Styles. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gkiouzepas, Lampros, and Margaret K. Hogg. 2011. “Articulating a New Framework for Visual Metaphors in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 40 (1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, Laura K. M., and Jan R. Landwehr. 2015. “A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics: The Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 19 (4): 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315574978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, Joy Paul. 1950. “Creativity.” The American Psychologist 5 (9): 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, Henrik. 2011. “The Impact of Incomplete Typeface Logos on Perceptions of the Firm.” Journal of Marketing 75 (4): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, Marco, Arnd Florack, Rafael Gattringer, Tim Eberhardt, Ellen Enkel, and Peter Kenning. 2017. “Flag Up! – Flagship Products as Important Drivers of Perceived Brand Innovativeness.” Journal of Business Research 71 (February): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Janiszewski, Chris. 1988. “Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought.” Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1086/209157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, Oliver P., Eileen M. Donahue, and Robert L. Kentle. 1991. The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kardes, Frank R., Steven S. Posavac, and Maria L. Cronley. 2004. “Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (3): 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees, Jeremy, Christopher Berry, Scot Burton, and Kim Sheehan. 2017. “An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1): 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornmeier, Jürgen, and Michael Bach. 2012. “Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes but Not the Stimulus.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosegarten, Jay, and Gary Kose. 2014. “Seeing Reversals in Ambiguous Images: To Know or Not to Know?” Perceptual and Motor Skills 119 (1): 228–236. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.27.PMS.119c15z9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, Werner, Bernd Schmitt, and Anton Meyer. 2011. “How Does Perceived Firm Innovativeness Affect the Consumer?” Journal of Business Research 64 (8): 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, Lisa M., Patrick J. Rottinghaus, and Fred H. Borgen. 2002. “Meta-Analyses of Big Six Interests and Big Five Personality Factors.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 (2): 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Gerald M., and Thomas C. Toppino. 2004. “Enduring Interest in Perceptual Ambiguity: Alternating Views of Reversible Figures.” Psychological Bulletin 130 (5): 748–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, Deborah J., and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1989. “Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework.” Journal of Marketing 53 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, Robert R. 1987. “Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1992. “On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric.” Journal of Consumer Research 19 (2): 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/209295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1996. “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (4): 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1086/209459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David Glen Mick. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses.” Journal of Consumer Research 26 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messaris, Paul. 1997. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mick, David G. 1992. “Levels of Subjective Comprehension in Advertising Processing and Their Relations to Ad Perceptions, Attitudes and Memory.” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (4): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/209270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Praggyan, and S. Ratneshwar. 2015. “Did You Get It? Factors Influencing Subjective Comprehension of Visual Metaphors in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 44 (3): 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.967424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necker, Louis Albert. 1832. “LXI. Observations on Some Remarkable Optical Phænomena Seen in Switzerland; and on an Optical Phænomenon Which Occurs on Viewing a Figure of a Crystal or Geometrical Solid.” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 1 (5): 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443208647909
   Google Scholar
• Peracchio, Laura A., and Joan Meyers-Levy. 1994. “How Ambiguous Cropped Objects in Ad Photos Can Affect Product Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1): 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/209392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Matthew O. 2019. “Aspects of Visual Metaphor: An Operational Typology of Visual Rhetoric for Research in Advertising.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (1): 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1447760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, Kristopher J., and Andrew F. Hayes. 2004. “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36 (4): 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rammstedt, Beatrice, and Oliver P. John. 2007. “Measuring Personality in One Minute or Less: A 10-Item Short Version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German.” Journal of Research in Personality 41 (1): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, Gudrun, Iris Vermeir, Maggie Geuens, and Anneleen Van Kerckhove. 2019. “A Match Made in Heaven or down under? The Effectiveness of Matching Visual and Verbal Horizons in Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 29 (3): 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, Sara, Martin Eisend, Scott Koslow, and Micael Dahlen. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works.” Journal of Marketing 84 (6): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920929288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Edgar. 1958. “Figure and Ground.” In Readings in Perception, edited by Beardslee David Cromwell and Michael Wertheimer, 35–101. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda M. 1994. “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2): 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1086/209396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda M., and Patrick Vargas. 2007. “Writing with Pictures: Toward a Unifying Theory of Consumer Response to Images.” Journal of Consumer Research 34 (3): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1086/519145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams, Rahil, Frank Alpert, and Mark Brown. 2015. “Consumer Perceived Brand Innovativeness.” European Journal of Marketing 49 (9/10): 1589–1615. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-05-2013-0240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Nazuk, and Sajeev Varki. 2018. “Active White Space (AWS) in Logo Designs: Effects on Logo Evaluations and Brand Communication.” Journal of Advertising 47 (3): 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2018.1463880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Robert E., Scott B. MacKenzie, Xiaojing Yang, Laura M. Buchholz, and William K. Darley. 2007. “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising.” Marketing Science 26 (6): 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. Paul. 1987. Using the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking to Guide the Teaching of Creative Behavior. Benesnville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vakratsas, Demetrios, and Tim Ambler. 1999. “How Advertising Works: What Do we Really Know?” Journal of Marketing 63 (1): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Douglas, Scott Koslow, and Mark Kilgour. 2019. “Future Directions for Advertising Creativity Research.” Journal of Advertising 48 (1): 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1585307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, Richard, Caroline Watt, Kenneth Gilhooly, and George Georgiou. 2011. “Creativity and Ease of Ambiguous Figural Reversal.” British Journal of Psychology 102 (3): 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02031.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, Xiaojing, and Robert E. Smith. 2009. “Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity.” Marketing Science 28 (5): 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar