238
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Theory and practice of agenda setting: understanding media, bot, and public agendas in the South Korean presidential election

, , &
Pages 24-56 | Received 24 Jan 2023, Accepted 16 Sep 2023, Published online: 04 Dec 2023

References

  • Ahuja, S., & Dubey, G. (2017, August). Clustering and sentiment analysis on Twitter data. In 2017 2nd International Conference on Telecommunication and Networks (TEL-NET) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
  • Albahri, A. S., Duhaim, A. M., Fadhel, M. A., Alnoor, A., Baqer, N. S., Alzubaidi, L., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Bai, J., Salhi, A., Santamaría, J., Ouyang, C., Gupta, A., Gu, Y., & Deveci, M. (2023). A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion.
  • Almon, S. (1965). The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 178–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911894
  • Aral, S., & Eckles, D. (2019). Protecting elections from social media manipulation. Science, 365(6456), 858–861. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8243
  • Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F. (2010). Now tweet this: How news organizations use Twitter. Electronic News, 4(4), 218–235.
  • Assenmacher, D., Clever, L., Frischlich, L., Quandt, T., Trautmann, H., & Grimme, C. (2020). Demystifying social bots: On the intelligence of automated social media actors. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 2056305120939264.
  • Badawy, A., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (May 2019). Who falls for online political manipulation? In Proceedings of the Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17, 162–168.
  • Baek, C. (2019). Understanding Windows for global policy: An examination of the Free-Semester Program in Korea. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(3), 398–415.
  • Barber, S., & Hathaway, M. (2022). China’s pet activists: Using moral arguments and epidemic concerns to make space for animal rights. International Review of Environmental History, 8(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.22459/IREH.08.01.2022.04
  • Baumann, H. C., Zheng, P., & McCombs, M. (2018). First and second-level agenda-setting in the 2014 Indian general election: A time-series analysis of party-media relation. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1390773
  • Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11), 11-7.
  • Borenstein, M. (2022). Comprehensive meta-analysis software. Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta-Analysis in Context, 535–548.
  • Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011 (pp. 1–9). The European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR).
  • Cameron, M. P., Barrett, P., & Stewardson, B. (2016). Can social media predict election results? Evidence from New Zealand. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959690
  • Chang, H. C. H., Chen, E., Zhang, M., Muric, G., & Ferrara, E. (2021). Social bots and social media manipulation in 2020: the year in review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08436.
  • Charles-Smith, L. E., Reynolds, T. L., Cameron, M. A., Conway, M., Lau, E. H. Y., Olsen, J. M., Pavlin, J. A., Shigematsu, M., Streichert, L. C., Suda, K. J., & Corley, C. D. (2015). Using social media for actionable disease surveillance and outbreak management: A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139701
  • Cho, C. K., Kim, B. Y., & Stoltman, J. P. (2022). Animal identity and space as represented in South Korean geography textbooks. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1852787
  • Chung, M., Seo, Y. N., Jung, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Agenda-setting in social TV: How and when user comments influence perceived issue importance. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1394–1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211020754
  • Colomina, C., Margalef, H. S., Youngs, R., & Jones, K. (2021). The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world. Brussels: European Parliament, 1–19.
  • Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., & Tesconi, M. (2017, April). The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms race. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion (pp. 963–972).
  • DalBen, S., & Jurno, A. (2021). More than code: The complex network that involves journalism production in five Brazilian robot initiatives. # ISOJ, 11(1), 111–137.
  • Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (April 2016). BotOrNot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, Montreal, QC, Canada, 11–15, 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889302
  • Dearing, J. W., Rogers, E. M., & Fei, X. (1988). The agenda-setting process for the issue of AIDS. Mass Communication Division, International Communication Association, New Orleans, 29.
  • Duan, Z., Li, J., Lukito, J., Yang, K. C., Chen, F., Shah, D. V., & Yang, S. (2022). Algorithmic agents in the hybrid media system: Social bots, selective amplification, and partisan news about COVID-19. Human Communication Research, 48(3), 516–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac012
  • Dunn, J. C. (1973). A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters. Journal of Cybernetics, 3(3), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969727308546046
  • Eggleston, J., & Wilson, S. L. (2023). Internet policy in South Korea: Liberal imperialism and paradox. In Handbook on democracy and security. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Elmas, T. (2022). The role of compromised accounts in social media manipulation (No. THESIS). EPFL.
  • Elmas, T., Overdorf, R., Ozkalay, A. F., & Aberer, K. (2019). Lateral astroturfing attacks on Twitter trending topics. In Conferencia] AMLD EPFL, Suiza, Ecublens, disponible en: https://cutt.ly/4yGaj5L (última consulta en julio de 2022)
  • Feinberg, M., Kovacheff, C., Teper, R., & Inbar, Y. (2019). Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000149
  • Ferrara, E. (2018). Measuring social spam and the effect of bots on information diffusion in social media. In Complex spreading phenomena in social systems: Influence and contagion in real-world social networks (pp. 229–255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_13
  • Ferrara, E. (2020). Bots, elections, and social media: A brief overview. In Disinformation, misinformation, and fake news in social media (pp. 95–114).
  • Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
  • Funk, M. J., & McCombs, M. (2017). Strangers on a theoretical train: Inter-media agenda setting, community structure, and local news coverage. Journalism Studies, 18(7), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1099460
  • Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
  • Gildersleve, P., Lambiotte, R., & Yasseri, T. (2022). Between news and history: Identifying networked topics of collective attention on Wikipedia. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07616.
  • Guo, L. (2019). Media agenda diversity and intermedia agenda setting in a controlled media environment: A computational analysis of China’s online news. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2460–2477. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1601029
  • Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011, May). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. In Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
  • Gurumyen, B. D., Akanle, O., Yikwabs, Y. P., & Nomishan, T. S. (2020). Zootherapy: The use of dog meat for traditional African medicine in Kanke local government area, Plateau State, Nigeria. Journal of Tourism and Heritage Studies, 9(2), 1–14.
  • Hagen, L., Neely, S., Keller, T. E., Scharf, R., & Vasquez, F. E. (2022). Rise of the machines? Examining the influence of social bots on a political discussion network. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 264–287.
  • Hajli, N., Saeed, U., Tajvidi, M., & Shirazi, F. (2022). Social bots and the spread of disinformation in social media: The challenges of artificial intelligence. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1238–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12554
  • Han, R., Xu, J., & Pan, D. (2022). How media exposure, media trust, and media bias perception influence public evaluation of COVID-19 pandemic in international metropolises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073942
  • Heidari, M., Jones Jr, J. H., & Uzuner, O. (2022). Online user profiling to detect social bots on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05966.
  • Hepp, A. (2020). Artificial companions, social bots and work bots: Communicative robots as research objects of media and communication studies. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7-8), 1410–1426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720916412
  • Higuchi, K. (2016). KH coder 3 reference manual. Kioto (Japan). Ritsumeikan University.
  • Hindman, D. B. (2009). Mass media flow and differential distribution of politically disputed beliefs: The belief gap hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 790–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600405
  • Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained. Routledge.
  • Jiang, M., Kim, E., & Woo, Y. (2020). The relationship between economic growth and air pollution—a regional comparison between China and South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082761
  • Jiang, Q., Cheng, Y., & Cho, S. K. (2021). Media coverage and public perceptions of the THAAD event in China, the United States, and South Korea: A cross-national network agenda-setting study. Chinese Journal of Communication, 14(4), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1902360
  • Jungherr, A., Posegga, O., & An, J. (2019). Discursive power in contemporary media systems: A comparative framework. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219841543
  • Keller, T. R., & Klinger, U. (2019). Social bots in election campaigns: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological implications. Political Communication, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1526238
  • Kim, A. (22 May 2020). Nearly half of the Twitter accounts discussing ‘Reopening America’ may be bots, researchers Say. CNN. Available online:https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/22/tech/twitter-bots-trnd/index.html
  • Kim, S. H., Jun, J., Thrasher, J. F., Heo, Y. J., & Cho, Y. J. (2021). News media presentations of heated tobacco products (HTPs): a content analysis of newspaper and television news coverage in South Korea. Journal of Health Communication, 26(5), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1931988
  • Langer, A. I., & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023
  • Laužikas, M., & Miliūtė, A. (2020). Human resource management effects on sustainability of high-tech companies: What Lithuania and South Korea can learn from each other. Insights Into Regional Development, 2(2), 562–579. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.2(5)
  • Lee, J. H., & Woo, J. (2020). Green new deal policy of South Korea: Policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12(23), 10191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310191
  • Lehrer, S., Xie, T., & Zeng, T. (2021). Does high-frequency social media data improve forecasts of low-frequency consumer confidence measures? Journal of Financial Econometrics, 19(5), 910–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz037
  • Loy-Benitez, J., Vilela, P., Li, Q., & Yoo, C. (2019). Sequential prediction of quantitative health risk assessment for the fine particulate matter in an underground facility using deep recurrent neural networks. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 169, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.024
  • Lu, S., Chen, W., Li, X., & Zheng, P. (2018). The Chinese smog crisis as media event: Examining Twitter discussion of the documentary under the dome. Policy & Internet, 10(4), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.191
  • Luceri, L., Deb, A., Giordano, S., & Ferrara, E. (2019). Evolution of bot and human behavior during elections. First Monday, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i9.10213
  • Maags, C. (2020). Long-term care insurance adoption in East Asia: Politics, ideas, and institutions. Politics & Policy, 48(1), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12339
  • Mainali, K., Bewick, S., Vecchio-Pagan, B., Karig, D., & Fagan, W. F. (2019). Detecting interaction networks in the human microbiome with conditional Granger causality. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(5), e1007037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007037
  • Majerczak, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2022). Trust, media credibility, social ties, and the intention to share towards information verification in an age of fake news. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020051
  • Martini, F., Samula, P., Keller, T. R., & Klinger, U. (2021). Bot, or not? Comparing three methods for detecting social bots in five political discourses. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211033566. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211033566
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  • Meleo-Erwin, Z., Basch, C., MacLean, S. A., Scheibner, C., & Cadorett, V. (2017). To each his own: Discussions of vaccine decision-making in top parenting blogs. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 13(8), 1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1321182
  • Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
  • Metaxas, P. T., & Mustafaraj, E. (2012). Social media and the elections. Science, 338(6106), 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230456
  • Neuman, R. W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S. A., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088
  • Onder, M., & Nyadera, I. N. (2020). The role of non-economic drivers in development planning: The case of South Korea and Turkey. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628057
  • Park, C., McQuaid, R., Lee, J., Kim, S., & Lee, I. (2019). The impact of job retention on continuous growth of engineering and informational technology SMEs in South Korea. Sustainability, 11(18), 5005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185005
  • Park, C. S. (2021). Impacts of cross-ownership between newspapers and television on viewpoint diversity: Testing one-owner-one-voice thesis. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1775–1792. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1965908
  • Park, K., & Weible, C. M. (2020). Developing policy theories in South Korea: Lessons from the advocacy coalition framework. In An emerging Asian model of governance and transnational knowledge transfer (pp. 16–30). Routledge.
  • Pastor-Galindo, J., Zago, M., Nespoli, P., Bernal, S. L., Celdrán, A. H., Pérez, M. G., & Mármol, F. G. (2020). Spotting political social bots in Twitter: A use case of the 2019 Spanish general election. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17(4), 2156–2170. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2020.3031573
  • Piao, Y., Lee, D., Park, S., Kim, H. G., & Jin, Y. (2022). Forest fire susceptibility assessment using Google Earth engine in Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2030808
  • Ping, H., & Qin, S. (2018). A social bots detection model based on deep learning algorithm. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT) , Chongqing, China (pp. 1435–1439). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2018.8600029
  • Published by Nina Jobst, Apr 11, 2022 Social media usage in South Korea – statistics & facts..https://www.statista.com/topics/5274/social-media-usage-in-south-korea/
  • Qayyum, H., Zhao, B. Z. H., Wood, I. D., Ikram, M., Kaafar, M. A., & Kourtellis, N. (2023). A longitudinal study of the top 1% toxic Twitter profiles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14603.
  • Robertson, C. T., & Mourão, R. R. (2020). Faking alternative journalism? An analysis of self-presentations of “fake news” sites. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1743193
  • Russell, A. B., Wexler, A. G., Harding, B. N., Whitney, J. C., Bohn, A. J., Goo, Y. A., Tran, B. Q., Barry, N. A., Zheng, H., Peterson, S. B., Chou, S., Gonen, T., Goodlett, D. R., Goodman, A. L., & Mougous, J. D. (2014). A type VI secretion-related pathway in Bacteroidetes mediates interbacterial antagonism. Cell Host and Microbe, 16(2), 227–236.
  • Salman, A., Mustaffa, N., Mohd Salleh, M. A., & Ali, M. N. S. (2016). Social media and agenda setting: Implications on political agenda. JurnalKomunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2016-3201-19
  • Santini, R. M., Salles, D., & Tucci, G. (2021). When machine behavior targets future voters: The use of social bots to test narratives for political campaigns in Brazil. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), 1220–1223.
  • Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2021). From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in digital markets. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102331
  • Sayyadiharikandeh, M., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2020, October). Detection of novel social bots by ensembles of specialized classifiers. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management (pp. 2725–2732).
  • Schäfer, F., Evert, S., & Heinrich, P. (2017). Japan’s 2014 general election: Political bots, right-wing internet activism, and prime minister Shinzō Abe’s hidden nationalist agenda. Big Data, 5(4), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0049
  • Schmidt, P., & Waud, R. N. (1973). The almon lag technique and the monetary versus fiscal policy debate. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(341), 11–19.
  • Sciarini, P., & Tresch, A. (2019). The political agenda-setting power of the media: the Europeanization nexus. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(5), 734–751.
  • Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications. 9(1), 4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7
  • Shi, W., Liu, D., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wen, S., & Su, J. (2020). Social bots’ sentiment engagement in health emergencies: A topic-based analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic discussions on Twitter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228701
  • Skewes, E. (2018). Time delays are not enough; media must call out lies. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(2), 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2018.1435498
  • Slothuus, R., & Bisgaard, M. (2021). How political parties shape public opinion in the real world. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 896–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12550
  • Smith, K. A. (2016). Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues. In Agenda setting (pp. 75–87). Routledge.
  • Su, Y., & Borah, P. (2019). Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1641451
  • Tracey, B., & Francesca, G. (Eds.) (2020). Educational research and innovation education in the digital Age healthy and happy children: Healthy and happy children. OECD Publishing.
  • Vargo, C. J. (2018). Fifty years of agenda-setting research: New directions and challenges for the theory. The Agenda Setting Journal, 2(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18023.var
  • Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086
  • Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Ogan, C. L., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2014, June). Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (pp. 81–90).
  • Vasilkova, V. V., & Legostaeva, N. I. (2019). Social bots in political communication. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-121-133
  • Wells, C., Shah, D., Lukito, J., Pelled, A., Pevehouse, J. C., & Yang, J. (2020). Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness: A media systems approach. New Media & Society, 22(4), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893987
  • Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2016). Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10(1), 1–18. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10021331
  • Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press.
  • Yang, F., & Sun, T. (2021). Who has set whose agenda on social media? A dynamic social network analysis of tweets on Paris attack. Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 341–363.
  • Yang, K. C., Ferrara, E., & Menczer, F. (2022). Botometer 101: Social bot practicum for computational social scientists. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(2), 1511–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-022-00177-5
  • Yang, K. C., Varol, O., Davis, C. A., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.115
  • Yang, K. C., Varol, O., Hui, P. M., & Menczer, F. (2020, April). Scalable and generalizable social bot detection through data selection. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 34(01), 1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5460
  • Yang, X., Chen, B. C., Maity, M., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social politics: Agenda setting and political communication on social media. In Social Informatics: 8th International Conference, SocInfo 2016, Bellevue, WA, USA, November 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 8 (pp. 330–344). Springer International Publishing.
  • Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Qi, X., & Liu, J. (2022a). Could social bots’ sentiment engagement shape humans’ sentiment on COVID-19 vaccine discussion on Twitter? Sustainability, 14(9), 5566–5585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095566
  • Zhang, M., Qi, X., Chen, Z., & Liu, J. (2022b). Social bots’ involvement in the COVID-19 vaccine discussions on Twitter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1651–1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031651
  • Zhang, Y., Song, W., Shao, J., Abbas, M., Zhang, J., Koura, Y. H., & Su, Y. (2023). Social bots’ role in the COVID-19 pandemic discussion on Twitter.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.