Twelve tips for applying Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance to optimize online teaching

References

• Akcaoglu M, Lee E. 2016. Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. Int Rev Res Open Dis. 17:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Attardi SM, Barbeau ML, Rogers KA. 2018. Improving online interactions: lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anat Sci Educ. 11(6):592–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attardi SM, Rogers KA. 2015. Design and implementation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 8(1):53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbeau ML, Johnson M, Gibson C, Rogers KA. 2013. The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course. Anat Sci Educ. 6(4):246–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Borokhovski E, Wade CA, Tamim RM, Surkes MA, Bethel EC. 2009. A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev Educ Res. 79(3):1243–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L, Wallet PA, Fiset M, Huang B. 2004. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res. 74(3):379–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Apps J. 1980. Redefining the discipline of adult education. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; p. 219.
   Google Scholar
• Clark RC, Mayer RE. 2011. E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Greensborough (NC): Center for Creative Leadership; [accessed 2020 May 7]. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oakland/detail.action?docID=697625#.
   Google Scholar
• Conference on College Composition and Communication Online, Online Writing Instruction [CCCC OWI]. 2013. Committee for Effective Practices in Online Writing Instruction. A position statement of principles and effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Urbana (IL): National Council of Teachers of English. [accessed 2021 March 1]. http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
   Google Scholar
• Dennen VP. 2013. Activity design and instruction in online learning. In: Moore MG, editor. Handbook of distance education. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 282–298.
   Google Scholar
• Dueber B, Misanchuk M. 2001. Sense of community in a distance education course. In: Proceedings of the mid-south instructional technology conference; April 9–11; Murfreesboro (TN): Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro. p. 23. [accessed 2020 Oct 7]. http://billdueber.com/dueber-misanchuk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans C, Sabry K. 2003. Evaluation of the interactivity of web-based learning systems: principles and process. Innov Educ Teach Intl. 40(1):89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend B, Johnston S. 2005. Florida virtual school: a choice for all students. In: Berge ZL, Clark T, editors. Virtual schools: planning for success. New York (NY): Teachers College Press; p. 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Georgetown University Library. 2021. Evaluating internet resources. Washington (DC): Georgetown University; [accessed 2021 Feb 15]. https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content.
   Google Scholar
• Gierdowski DC. 2019. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2019. Louisville (CO): EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research; [accessed 2021 Mar 1]. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/10/2019-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsky P, Caspi A. 2005. A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Q Rev Distance Educ. 6:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena CN, Zittle FN. 1997. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. Am J Dist Educ. 11(3):8–26.
   Google Scholar
• He L, Yang N, Xu L, Ping F, Li W, Sun Q, Li Y, Zhu H, Zhang H. 2021. Synchronous distance education vs traditional education for health science students: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Med Educ. 55(3):293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett BL. 2013. Fully online and hybrid writing instruction. In: Hessler HB, Taggart AR, Schick K, editors. A guide to composition pedagogies. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman DC, Willis DJ, Gunawardena CN. 1994. Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. Am J Distance Educ. 8(2):30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski S. 2008. Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly. 31:51–55.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union [ITC]. 2019. Measuring digital development. Facts and figures. Geneva (Switzerland): United Nations Economic and Social Council; [accessed 2020 Oct 12]. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Jia C, Hew KF, Bai S, Huang W. 2021. Adaptation of a conventional flipped course to an online flipped format during the Covid-19 pandemic: student learning performance and engagement. JRTE. [accessed 2021 March 1]; [21 p.]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1847220
   Google Scholar
• Joksimović S, Gašević D, Kovanović V, Riecke BE, Hatala M. 2015. Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. J Comput Assist Learn. 31(6):638–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput Human Behav. 19(3):335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchenfeldt S, Attardi SM, Pratt RL, Sawarynski KE, Taylor TA. 2020. Twelve tips for interfacing with the new generation of medical students: iGen. Med Teach. [accessed 2021 Mar 1]; [6 p.]. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1845305
   Google Scholar
• Lim FP. 2017. An analysis of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in e-learning. ATL. 143:230–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. 2014. Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, image, and embodiment principles. In: Mayer RE, editor. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. 2nd Ed. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 345–368.
   Google Scholar
• Mick CS, Middlebrook G. 2015. Asynchronous and synchronous modalities. In: Hewett B, DePew K, editors. Foundational practices of online writing instruction. Fort Collins (CO): WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press; p. 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MG. 1989. Three types of interactions. Am J Distance Educ. 3(2):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MG. 1991. Distance education theory. Am J Distance Educ. 5(3):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MG. 1993. Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan D, editor. Theoretical principles of distance education. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Moore MG. 2019. The theory of transactional distance. In: Moore MG, Diehl WC, editors. Handbook of distance education. 4th ed. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Moore RL. 2014. Importance of developing community in distance education courses. Techtrends Tech Trends. 58(2):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet TP. 2000. Interactive television instructors’ perceptions of students’ nonverbal responsiveness and their influence on distance teaching. Commun Educ. 49(2):146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet TP, Beebe SA, Raffeld PC, Medlock AL. 2004. The effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teacher self‐efficacy and job satisfaction. Commun Educ. 53(2):150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwoudt JE. 2020. Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 36(3):15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyarzun B, Stefaniak J, Bol L, Morrison GR. 2018. Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. J Comput High Educ. 30(1):154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC. 2008. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. 134(2):270–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook A. 1985. Actions speak louder than words: paralanguage, communication and education. Tesol q. 19(2):259–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters O. 1998. Learning and teaching in distance education: analysis and interpretation from an international perspective. London (UK): Kogan Page; p. 248.
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum A, Zawacki-Richter O. 2018. Open and distance education in Australia, Europe, and the Americas: National perspectives in a digital age. Singapore (Singapore): Springer Nature. Chapter Chapter 1, Open and distance education in Australia, Europe, and the Americas; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Nix G, Hamm D. 2003. Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. J Educ Psychol. 95(2):375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman JE, Allen IE, Seaman J. 2018. Grade increase. Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Part (MA): Babson Survey Research Group. [accessed 2020 Oct 16] https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou CR, Perencevich KC, DiCintio M, Turner JC. 2004. Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educ Psychol. 39(2):97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung E, Mayer RE. 2012. Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Comput Human Behav. 28(5):1738–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa D, Dorsey J, Denison E. 2018. The state of Gen Z 2018. Austin (TX): The Center for Generational Kinetics. [accessed 2020 Oct 2]. https://genhq.com/generation-z-research-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk AE, Brooks DM. 1983. Nonverbal communication in teaching. Rev Res Educ. 10:103–149.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Mei H. 2013. Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Comput Educ. 69:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker A, Kozma R. 2003. The virtual high school: teaching generation V. New York (NY): Teachers College Press; p. 160.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M, Porac J, Lathin D, Smith R, Deci E. 1978. On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 4(3):443–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar