534
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The relationship between medical student engagement in the provision of the school’s education programme and learning outcomes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Armitage-Chan E, May SA. 2018. Developing a professional studies curriculum to support veterinary professional identity formation. J Vet Med Educ. 45(4):489–501.
  • Aspire-to-Excellence. 2013. International recognition of excellence in education. Dundee: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE); [accessed 2021 May 18]. http://www.aspire-to-excellence.org.
  • Chen HC, Sheu L, O'Sullivan P, Ten Cate O, Teherani A. 2014. Legitimate workplace roles and activities for early learners. Med Educ. 48(2):136–145.
  • Coates H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Qual High Educ. 11(1):25–36.
  • Coates H. 2010. Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). High Educ. 60(1):1–17.
  • Curran VR, Fairbridge NA, Deacon D. 2020. Peer assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):1–8.
  • Gonzalez CM, Deno ML, Kintzer E, Marantz PR, Lypson ML, McKee MD. 2019. A qualitative study of New York medical student views on implicit bias instruction: implications for curriculum development. J Gen Intern Med. 34(5):692–698.
  • Green RA, Whitburn LY, Zacharias A, Byrne G, Hughes DL. 2018. The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 11(5):471–477.
  • Hunt D, Klamen D, Harden RM, Ali F. 2018. The ASPIRE-to-Excellence program: a global effort to improve the quality of medical education. Acad Med. 93(8):1117–1119.
  • Khoiriyah U, Roberts C, Jorm C, Van der Vleuten C. 2015. Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking. BMC Med Educ. 15(1):1–8.
  • Kusurkar R, Ten Cate TJ, Vos C, Westers P, Croiset G. 2013. How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 18(1):57–69.
  • Kusurkar RA, Daelmans HE, Horrevoets A, de Haan M, van der Meijde M, Croiset G. 2018. Reforms in VUmc School of Medical Sciences Amsterdam: student engagement, a minor elective semester and stakeholder collaboration in improving the quality of assessments. Med Teach. 40(5):501–505.
  • Lerchenfeldt S, Taylor TA. 2020. Best practices in peer assessment: training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality feedback. Adv Med Educ Pract. 11:571–578.
  • Li H, Ding N, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wen D. 2017. Assessing medical professionalism: a systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties. PLoS One. 12(5):e0177321.
  • McGinness HT, Caldwell PH, Gunasekera H, Scott KM. 2020. An educational intervention to increase student engagement in feedback. Med Teach. 42(11):1289–1297.
  • Milles LS, Hitzblech T, Drees S, Wurl W, Arends P, Peters H. 2019. Student engagement in medical education: a mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development. Med Teach. 41(10):1143–1150.
  • Moos RH. 1973. Conceptualizations of human environments. Am Psychol. 28(8):652–665.
  • Patricio M. 2016. The ASPIRE initiative: excellence in student engagement in the school. Educ Méd. 17(3):109–114.
  • Peters H, Zdravkovic M, João Costa M, Celenza A, Ghias K, Klamen D, Mossop L, Rieder M, Devi Nadarajah V, Wangsaturaka D, et al. 2019. Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement. Med Teach. 41(6):632–637.
  • Pollard K. 2009. Student engagement in interprofessional working in practice placement settings. J Clin Nurs. 18(20):2846–2856.
  • Ribeiro LMC, Mamede S, de Brito EM, Moura AS, de Faria RMD, Schmidt HG. 2019. Effects of deliberate reflection on students' engagement in learning and learning outcomes. Med Educ. 53(4):390–397.
  • Sandars J. 2009. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE guide no. 44. Med Teach. 31(8):685–695.
  • Schiekirka S, Reinhardt D, Beibarth T, Anders S, Pukrop T, Raupach T. 2013. Estimating learning outcomes from pre-and posttest student self-assessments: a longitudinal study. Acad Med. 88(3):369–375.
  • Schönrock-Adema J, Visscher M, Raat AJ, Brand PL. 2015. Development and validation of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED): a brief instrument to assess the educational environment in postgraduate medical education. PLoS One. 10(9):e0137872.
  • Schwarz MR, Wojtczak A, Zhou T. 2004. Medical education in China's leading medical schools. Med Teach. 26(3):215–222.
  • Stephenson CR, Bonnes SL, Sawatsky AP, Richards LW, Schleck CD, Mandrekar JN, Beckman TJ, Wittich CM. 2020. The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):1–8.
  • Trowler V. 2010. Student engagement literature review. Higher Ed Acad. 11(1):1–15.
  • Whitcomb ME. 2005. Medical professionalism: can it be taught? Acad Med. 80(10):883–884.
  • Working Committee for the Accreditation of Medical Education. 2016. Accreditation standards for basic medical education in China. Beijing (China): Working Committee for the Accreditation of Medical Education, Ministry of Education; p. 3–5.
  • Wouters A, Croiset G, Schripsema NR, Cohen-Schotanus J, Spaai G, Hulsman R, Kusurkar R. 2017. A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 22(2):447–462.
  • Wu L, Wang Y, Peng X, Song M, Guo X, Nelson H, Wang W. 2014. Development of a medical academic degree system in China. Med Educ Online. 19(1):23141.
  • Zhu J, Li W, Chen L. 2016. Doctors in China: improving quality through modernisation of residency education. Lancet. 388(10054):1922–1929.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.