Framing the cross-border commuting literature: a systematic review and bibliographic analysis

References

• Alegria, T. (2002). Demand and supply of Mexican cross-border workers. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 17(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2002.9695581
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. (1960). A theory of the urban land market. Papers in Regional Science, 6(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01710.x
   Google Scholar
• Balogh, P., & Pete, M. (2018). Bridging the gap: Cross-border integration in the Slovak-Hungarian borderland around Štúrovo-Esztergom. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1294495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basche, H., & Spera, F. (2023). Interactions between key factors that influence cross-border cooperation in public transport: The case of the Euregio Meuse-Rhine. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 38(5), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1957978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, P. (2020). Exchange rate effects on cross-border commuting: Evidence from the Swiss-Italian border. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(3), 969–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz025
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, H. (2022). Challenges of pandemic-related border closure for everyday lives of Poles and Czechs in the divided town of Cieszyn/Český Těšín: Integrated functional space or reemergence of animosities? Nationalities Papers, 50(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broersma, L., Edzes, A., & van Dijk, J. (2020). Commuting between border regions in The Netherlands, Germany and Belgium: An explanatory model. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(3), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1810590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. (2022). Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, S. (2012). Cross-border local mobility between Luxembourg and the Walloon region: An overview. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12, 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F., & Dianin, A. (2020). Efficiency of public transport for cross-border commuting: An accessibility-based analysis in central Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 89, Article 102876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F., & Sommacal, G. (2019). Public transport in transnational peripheral areas: Challenges and opportunities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 879, 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_67
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., & Heugel, A. (2019). Cross-border commuting dynamics: Patterns and driving forces in the alpine macro-region. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1700822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. E., Laing, D., & Wang, P. (2001). Spatial mismatch in search equilibrium. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(4), 949–972. https://doi.org/10.1086/322824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2016). Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: Wishful thinking? European Planning Studies, 24(10), 1825–1843. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1195796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., Durand, F., & Sohn, C. (2021). Cross-border spatial planning in border cities: Unpacking the symbolic role of borders. In Border cities and territorial development (pp. 39–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J. (2019). Satisfaction-induced travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 63, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drevon, G., Gerber, P., Klein, O., & Enaux, C. (2018). Measuring functional integration by identifying the trip chains and the profile of cross-border workers: Empirical evidences from Luxembourg. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1257362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., Decoville, A., & Knippschild, R. (2020). Everything all right at the internal EU borders? The ambivalent effects of cross-border integration and the rise of Euroscepticism. Geopolitics, 25(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1382475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Nelles, J. (2014). Binding cross-border regions: An analysis of cross-border governance in Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai eurometropolis. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(5), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edzes, A. J., van Dijk, J., & Broersma, L. (2022). Does cross-border commuting between EU-countries reduce inequality? Applied Geography, 139, Article 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enaux, C., & Gerber, P. (2014). Beliefs about energy, a factor in daily ecological mobility? Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). Statistics on commuting patterns at regional level.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2023). The statistical office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fries-Tersch, E., Tugran, T., Markowska, A., & Jones, M. (2018). 2018 annual report on intra-EU labour mobility.
   Google Scholar
• Frigren, P., & Telve, K. (2020). Historical and modern perspectives on mobile labour: Parallel case study on Finnish and Estonian cross-border worker stereotypes and masculinities. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. (2012). Advancement in conceptualizing cross-border daily mobility: The Benelux context in the European Union. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12(2), 178–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, P., Ma, T. Y., Klein, O., Schiebel, J., & Carpentier-Postel, S. (2017). Cross-border residential mobility, quality of life and modal shift: A Luxembourg case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 104, 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, P., Thériault, M., Enaux, C., & Carpentier-Postel, S. (2018). Modelling impacts of beliefs and attitudes on mode choices. Lessons from a survey of Luxembourg cross-border commuters. Transportation Research Procedia, 32, 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.037
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P., Thériault, M., Enaux, C., & Carpentier-Postel, S. (2020). Links between attitudes, mode choice, and travel satisfaction: A cross-border long-commute case study. Sustainability, 12(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijsel, P. D., & Janssen, M. (2000). Understanding the Dutch-German cross-border labour market: Are highly educated workers unwilling to move? Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 91(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottholmseder, G., & Theurl, E. (2007). Determinants of cross-border commuting: Do cross-border commuters within the household matter? Journal of Borderlands Studies, 22(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2007.9695679
   Google Scholar
• Greve, B., & Rydbjerg, M. (2003). Cross-border commuting in the EU: Obstacles and barriers country report: The Øresund region.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS One, 10(9), e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haindorfer, R. (2020). Impacts of negative labor market experiences on the life satisfaction of European East-West mobile workers: Cross-border commuters from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary in Austria. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(2), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619897087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz, F., & Ward-Warmedinger, M. (2006). Cross-border labour mobility within an enlarged EU (ECB Occasional Paper, 52).
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. (1990). Border commuter workers and transfrontier metropolitan structure along the United States-Mexico border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 5(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.1990.9695393
   Google Scholar
• Hochman, J. (2005). Border planning for the 21st century. Public Roads, 68(4), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. (2012). Do commuters suffer from job-education mismatch? Applied Economics Letters, 19(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.577004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, P. (2014). Are commuters in the EU better educated than non-commuters but worse than migrants? Urban Studies, 51(3), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013498282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järv, O., Aagesen, H. W., Väisänen, T., & Massinen, S. (2023). Revealing mobilities of people to understand cross-border regions: Insights from Luxembourg using social media data. European Planning Studies, 31(8), 1754–1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2108312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joly, I., & Vincent-Geslin, S. (2016). Intensive travel time: An obligation or a choice? European Transport Research Review, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-016-0195-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, M. (2014). (Un)familiarity? Labor related cross-border mobility in Sønderjylland/Schleswig since Denmark joined the EC in 1973. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2014.938968
   Google Scholar
• Knotter, A. (2003). The border paradox. Uneven development, cross-border mobility and the comparative history of the Euregio Meuse-Rhine. Federalisme Regionalisme, 3, 2002–2003.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, R., & Matthiessen, C. (2009). Barrier effects of international borders on fixed link traffic generation: The case of Øresundsbron. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopinak, K., & Soriano Miras, R. (2013). Types of migration enabled by maquiladoras in Baja California, Mexico: The importance of commuting. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.751733
   Google Scholar
• Labouré, M. (2019). Pensions: The impact of migrations and cross-border workers in a small open economy. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 18(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747217000464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzla, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(1), b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limtanakool, N., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2006). On the participation in medium- and long-distance travel: A decomposition analysis for the UK and The Netherlands. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 97, 389–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofgren, O. (2008). Regionauts: The transformation of cross-border regions in Scandinavia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408090418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffenini, L., Schiavina, M., Melchiorri, M., Pesaresi, M., & Kemper, T. (2020). GHS-DUG user guide (Technical Report Version 4). Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Mathä, T., & Wintr, L. (2009). Commuting flows across bordering regions: A note. Applied Economics Letters, 16(7), 735–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701221857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014). Territorial cohesion trends in inner Scandinavia: The role of cross-border cooperation – INTERREG-A 1994–2010. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(5), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.960949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2018). Should EU cross-border cooperation programmes focus mainly on reducing border obstacles? Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 64(3), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2019). Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., Ramírez, M. G., Brustia, G., Dellagiacoma, A. C., & Mullan, C. A. (2023). Reducing border barriers for cross-border commuters in Europe via the EU b-solutions initiative. European Planning Studies, 31(4), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2093606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michniak, D. (2016). Main trends in commuting in Slovakia. European Journal of Geography, 7(2), 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, C., Alfredsson-Olsson, E., Ericsson, B., & Overvåg, K. (2018). The border as an engine for mobility and spatial integration: A study of commuting in a Swedish-Norwegian context. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 72(4), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1497698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooses, V., Silm, S., Tammaru, T., & Saluveer, E. (2020). An ethno-linguistic dimension in transnational activity space measured with mobile phone data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00627-3
   Google Scholar
• Morchid, K., & O’Mahony, M. (2019). Transport sector impacts of a border between Ireland and Northern Ireland after a hard Brexit. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, Article 9029852. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9029852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, M. (2011). The impact of Czech commuters on the German labour market. Prague Economic Papers, 20(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahrstedt, B. (2000). Legal aspect of border commuting in the Danish-German border region (Technical Report, IME Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Nonnenmacher, L., Baumann, M., le Bihan, E., Askenazy, P., & Chauvel, L. (2021). Cross-border mobility in European countries: Associations between cross-border worker status and health outcomes. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10564-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotný, L., & Böhm, H. (2022). New re-bordering left them alone and neglected: Czech cross-border commuters in German-Czech borderland. European Societies, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2029131
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, K. (2010). Risk aversion, time preference and cross-border commuting and migration intentions (Technical Report, WIFO Working Papers).
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, K. (2014). Cross-border commuting and migration intentions: The roles of risk aversion and time preference. Contemporary Economics, 8(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.137
   Google Scholar
• Orraca Romano, P. (2015). Immigrants and cross-border workers in the US-Mexico border region. Frontera Norte, 27(53), 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Paccoud, A., Hesse, M., Becker, T., & Górczyńska, M. (2022). Land and the housing affordability crisis: Landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context. Housing Studies, 37(10), 1782–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1950647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci, P., Tiongson, E. R., Walewski, M., & Liwiński, J. (2010). Internal labour mobility in Central Europe and the Baltic Region: Evidence from labour force surveys. The Labour Market Impact of the EU Enlargement: A New Regional Geography of Europe? 197–225.
   Google Scholar
• Parenti, A., & Tealdi, C. (2023). Don’t stop me now: Cross-border commuting in the aftermath of Schengen. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 23(3), 761–806. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrard, O. (2008). Commuters, residents and job competition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(6), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieters, M., de Jong, G., & van der Hoorn, T. (2012). Cross-border car traffic in Dutch mobility models. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12(2), 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pries, L. (2019). The momentum of transnational social spaces in Mexico-US migration. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0135-5
   Google Scholar
• Renkow, M., & Hoover, D. (2000). Commuting, migration, and rural-urban population dynamics. Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M., & Curlango Rosas, C. (2013). Ambient urban games for reducing the stress of commuters crossing the Mexico-US border. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8276, 386–389.
   Google Scholar
• Romani, J., Suriñach, J., & Artís, M. (2003). Are commuting and residential mobility decisions simultaneous?: The case of Catalonia (Spain). Regional Studies, 37(8), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000128730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwendal, J., & Meijer, E. (2001). Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: A mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandow, E. (2008). Commuting behaviour in sparsely populated areas: Evidence from northern Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebel, J., Omrani, H., & Gerber, P. (2015). Border effects on the travel mode choice of resident and cross-border workers in Luxembourg. EJTIR Issue, 15, 570–596.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T. (2005). Cross-border regional enlargement in Øresund. GeoJournal, 64(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-006-6874-5
   Google Scholar
• Siim, P. M., & Assmuth, L. (2016). Mobility patterns between Estonia and Finland: What about the children? Cultural Patterns and Life Stories, 273–304.
   Google Scholar
• Soe, R.-M. (2018). Smart cities: From silos to cross-border approach. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018040105
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. (2014). Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics, 19(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STATEC. (2020). L’impact des frontaliers dans la balance des paiements en 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., & Schneider, S. (2016). Commuting episodes in the United States: Their correlates with experiential wellbeing from the American Time Use Survey. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00542.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, S., & Balogh, P. (2018). Limits to integration: Persisting border obstacles in the EU. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. Urban Book Series (pp. 115–134). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., Petrović, A., & van Ham, M. (2022). Commuting behaviours and subjective wellbeing: A critical review of longitudinal research. Transport Reviews, 43(4), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2145386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telve, K. (2018). Absent or involved: Changes in fathering of Estonian men working in Finland. Gender, Place and Culture, 25(8), 1257–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1450227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telve, K. (2019). Family involved or left behind in migration? A family-centred perspective towards Estonia-Finland cross-border commuting. Mobilities, 14(5), 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1600885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K. (2012). Border surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned cross-border behaviour and planned territorial structures of cross-border governance. Planning Practice and Research, 27(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.670939
   Google Scholar
• Van Ommeren, J., Rietveld, P., & Nijkamp, P. (1997). Commuting: In search of jobs and residences. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Hu, H. (2017). Rise of interjurisdictional commuters and their mode choice: Evidence from the Chicago metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(3), 05017004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesböck, L. (2016). A preferred workforce? Employment practices of East-West cross-border labour commuters in the central European region. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 41(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-016-0245-3
   Google Scholar
• Wiesböck, L., & Verwiebe, R. (2017). Crossing the border for higher status? Occupational mobility of East-West commuters in the central European region. International Journal of Sociology, 47(3, SI), 162–181.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2017.1335514
   Google Scholar