Longitudinal changes of student engagement in social annotation

References

• Adams, B., & Wilson, N. S. (2020). Building community in asynchronous online higher education courses through collaborative annotation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(2), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520946422
   Google Scholar
• Aloni, M., & Harrington, C. (2018). Research based practices for improving the effectiveness of asynchronous online discussion boards. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000121
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, T. N. (2010). The effect of the integration of social annotation technology, first principles of instruction, and team-based learning on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. Florida State University’s Digital Repository. https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A168354
   Google Scholar
• Bakermans, M., Pfeifer, G., San Martín, W., & LeChasseur, K. (2022). Who writes and who responds? Gender and race-based differences in open annotations. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(5), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2021-0232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, Article 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchinato, G. (2022). Threaded forums and social annotation in higher education: A comparison in supporting collaborative knowledge construction. In G. Casalino, M. Cimitile, P. Ducange, N. Padilla Zea, R. Pecori, P. Picerno, & P. Raviolo (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science: Vol. 1452. Higher education learning methodologies and technologies online (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96060-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. W. W., & Pow, J. W. C. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Lo, C. K., & Hu, L. (2020). Sustaining online academic discussions: Identifying the characteristics of messages that receive responses. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., Hwang, R. H., & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1094–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Tanner, E. J. (2001). How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.2190/6DCH-BEN3-V7CF-QK47
   Google Scholar
• Fehrman, S., & Watson, S. L. (2021). A systematic review of asynchronous online discussions in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(3), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1858705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it and why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschy, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M., Schall, J., Hokfkens, T., Parr, A., & Snug, H. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacumo, L. A., & Savenye, W. (2020). Asynchronous discussion forum design to support cognition: Effects of rubrics and instructor prompts on learner’s critical thinking, achievement, and satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09664-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., Wang, S. M., Lin, P. C., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Exploring the learner’s knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of different asynchronous platforms: Comparison of an online discussion forum and Facebook. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of web-based materials. Computers & Education, 48, 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1496–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalir, J. H. (2020). Social annotation enabling collaboration for open learning. Distance Education, 41(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzara, J., & Clinton-Lisell, V. (2022). Using social annotation to enhance student engagement in psychology courses. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeeTiernan, S., & Grudin, J. (2000). Fostering engagement in asynchronous learning through collaborative multimedia annotation (Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-91). Microsoft.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Huang, X., Lin, L., & Chen, F. (2023). Peer interaction in social annotation: How to get upvotes? [Manuscript submitted for publication].
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T., & Koskey, K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan, L., Hong, J. C., Cao, M., Dong, Y., & Hou, X. (2023). Exploring the role of online EFL learners’ perceived social support in their learning engagement: A structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• McSporran, M., & Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning? Research in Learning Technology, 9(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776010090202
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Zyto, S., Karger, D., Yoo, J., & Mazur, E. (2016). Analysis of student engagement in an online annotation system in the context of a flipped introductory physics class. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), Article 020143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokelainen, P., Kurhila, J., Miettinen, M., Floreen, P., & Tirri, H. (2003). Evaluating the role of a shared document-based annotation tool in learner-centered collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies (pp. 200–203). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2003.1215056
   Google Scholar
• Novak, E., Razzouk, R., & Johnson, T. (2012). The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paccagnella, O. (2011). Sample size and accuracy of estimates in multilevel models. Methodology, 7(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, L. F., & Salvatore, J. (2015). Individual and social benefits of online discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., Lin, C., Wu, M., Zhou, J., & Luo, L. (2018). A tale of two communication tools: Discussion forum and mobile instant-messaging apps in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., & Theussen, A. (2023). Assessing negotiation skill and its development in an online collaborative simulation game: A social network analysis study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Wen, Y., & Quek, C. L. (2023). Engaging learners in synchronous online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4429–4452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11393-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedbusch, M., Lester, J., & Azevedo, R. (2023). A multi-level growth modeling approach to measuring learner attention with metacognitive pedagogical agents. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09336-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R. M., Shui, H., & Zhang, R. Z. (2020). Reading and connecting: Using social annotation in online classes. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar