An options-pricing approach to forecasting the French presidential election

References

• Abramowitz, A. (2012). Forecasting in a polarized era: The time for change model and the 2012 presidential election. Political Science and Politics, 45, 618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdağ, G. A. (2016). Rational political parties and electoral games: The AKP’s strategic move for the Kurdish vote in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 17, 126–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baujard, A., & Lebon, I. (2022). Not-so-strategic voters. Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election. Electoral Studies, 76, 102458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, N. H., & Fry, J. M. (2010). Regression: Linear models in statistics. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, K. (2020). A two-stage model to forecast elections in new democracies. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(4), 1407–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, K., & Blake, D. (2022). Good practice principles in modelling defined contribution plans. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, K., Blake, D., Buckner, D., & Fry, J. (2019). The valuation of no-negative equity guarantees and equity release mortgages. Economics Letters, 184, 108669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, Y., Jérôme, B., Lewis-Beck, M. S., Murr, A. E., & Savoi, J. (2022). Citizen forecasting: The 2022 French presidential election. Political Science and Politics, 55, 730–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easaw, J., Fang, Y., & Heravi, S. (2023). Using polls to forecast popular vote share for US presidential elections in 2016 and 2020: An optimal forecast combination based on ensemble empirical model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74(3), 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2101951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (2014). Forecasting US presidential elections using economic and noneconomic fundamentals. Political Science & Politics, 47(02), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000092
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Nadeau, R. (2012). Forecasting the 2012 French presidential election. Political Science and Politics, 45, 218–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, J., & Binner, J. M. (2016). Elementary modelling and behavioural analysis for emergency evacuations using social media. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 1014–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, J., & Burke, M. (2020). An options-pricing approach to election prediction. Quantitative Finance, 20(10), 1583–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2020.1757136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosal, S., & Van Der Vaart, A. (2017). Fundamentals of nonparametric Bayesian inference. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2017). Political markets. In K. Arzhei, J. Evans, & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour (pp. 861–882). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. (2023). Embrace the differences: Revisiting the PollyVote method of combining forecasts for U.S. presidential elections (2004 to 2020). International Journal of Forecasting, 39(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2015). Simple versus complex forecasting: The evidence. Journal of Business Research, 68(8), 1678–1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanretty, C. (2021). Forecasting multiparty by-elections using Dirichlet regression. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, T., & Heyes, J. (2018). Farewell to flexicurity? Austerity and labour policies in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(3), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16633756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, D., Schlag, C., Shaliastovich, I., & Thimme, J. (2019). Volatility-of-volatility risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(6), 2423–2452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109018001436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, J. C. (2008). Options, futures and other derivatives (7th ed.) Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Jérôme, B., Mongrain, P., & Nadeau, R. (2022). Forecasting the 2022 French presidential election: From a left-right logic to quadripolarization of politics. Political Science and Politics, 55, 697–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2022). Chapel Hill expert trend file 1999-2019. Electoral Studies, 75, 102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, R. S., Pfeffermann, D., & Steinberg, D. (2018). Election polls – A survey, a critique and proposals. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100204
   Google Scholar
• Khan, U., & Lieli, R. P. (2018). Information flow between prediction markets, polls and media: Evidence from the 2008 presidential primaries. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(4), 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lad, F. (1996). Operational, subjective statistical methods: A mathematical, philosophical and historical introduction. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levene, M., & Fenner, T. (2021). A stochastic differential equation approach to the analysis of the 2017 and 2019 UK general election polls. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(3), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2005). Election forecasting: Principles and practice. European Journal of Political Research, 31(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00317
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R., & Bélanger, E. (2016). The British general election: Synthetic forecasts. Electoral Studies, 41, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ye, L., Sun, J., Jiang, Y., & Wang, H. (2021). Modelling undecided votes to forecast elections: From bandwagon behaviour and the spiral of silence perspective. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(2), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongrain, P. (2022). Predicting in an (increasingly) unpredictable system? Forty years of election forecasting in France. French Politics, 20(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-022-00171-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr, A. (2016). The wisdom of crowds: What do citizens forecast for the 2015 British general election? Electoral Studies, 41, 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr, A. E. (2021). Do party leadership contests forecast British general elections? Electoral Studies, 72, 102342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., & Lewis-Beck, M. (2020). Election forecasts: Cracking the Danish case. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3), 892–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A. (1992). A note on parameter estimation in the multivariate beta distribution. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 24(10), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(92)90016-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajala, T., Korhonen, P., Malo, P., Sinha, A., Wallenius, J., & Dehnokhalaji, A. (2018). Accounting for political opinions, power and influence: A voting advice application. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(2), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekar, V., Binner, J., Najafi, H., Rickard, C., Swanson, R., & Fry, J. (2022). Voting intentions on social media and political opinion polls. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, S., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2021). Forecasting government support in Irish general elections: Opinion polls and structural models. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1654–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, J. J., & Vaughan Williams, L. (2019). Polls to probabilities: Comparing prediction markets and opinion polls. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(1), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisach, U. (2021). The responsibility of social media in times of societal and political manipulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 906–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, S. E., Sauppe, J. J., & Jacobson, S. H. (2015). Forecasting the 2012 and 2014 elections using Bayesian prediction and optimization. SAGE Open, 5(2), 215824401557972. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579724
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2012). What happened to the state-influence market economies (SMEs)? France, Italy and Spain confront the crisis as the good, the bad and the ugly. In W. Grant & G. K. Wilson (Eds.), The consequences of the global financial crisis; The rhetoric of the reform and regulation (pp. 156–186). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shahmanzari, M., Aksen, D., & Salhi, S. (2022). Multi-period travelling politician problem: A hybrid heuristic metaheuristic solution method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(6), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1895684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2017). Skin in the game: The hidden asymmetries in daily life. Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2018). Election predictions as martingales: An arbitrage approach. Quantitative Finance, 18(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2017.1395230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Yang, M., & Fry, M. J. (2015). Efficiency and equity tradeoffs in voting machine allocation problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C., Jennings, W., Fisher, S., Ford, R., & Pickup, M. (2013). Polls and the vote in Britain. Political Studies, 61(Suppl. 1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12008
   Google Scholar