An Atlas of Dietary Intakes and Medication Uses on Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Wide-Angle Mendelian Randomization Analysis

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarier M, Usta SS, Turgut H, Öztürk SA, Soylu A, Emek M, Kukul E, Bozcuk H, Sepin N. Prognostic value of HPV DNA in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a preliminary report of 2-year follow-up results. Urol J. 2021;19:45–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chamie K, Litwin MS, Bassett JC, Daskivich TJ, Lai J, Hanley JM, Konety BR, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2013;119(17):3219–27. doi:10.1002/cncr.28147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmunt J, Powles T, Henriksson R, Steinberg GD, Batyrbekova N, Schain F, Fleming S, Shalaby W, Siefker-Radtke AO. Clinical outcomes and economic burden for bladder cancer patients: an analysis from a Swedish cancer registry. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):5026. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5026
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y-B, Pan X-F, Chen J, Cao A, Zhang Y-G, Xia L, Wang J, Li H, Liu G, Pan A, et al. Combined lifestyle factors, incident cancer, and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(7):1085–93. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0741-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Osch F, Zeegers M. Who gets bladder cancer? In Diet and fighting bladder cancer. Elsevier. 2020. p. 1–6 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814677-4.00001-0
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian I, Verma S, Kumar S, Jere A, Anamika K. Multi-omics data integration, interpretation, and its application. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2020;14:1177932219899051. doi:10.1177/1177932219899051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CH, Ivanisevic J, Siuzdak G. Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(7):451–9. doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifani P, Kentsis A. Towards comprehensive and quantitative proteomics for diagnosis and therapy of human disease. Proteomics. 2017;17(1-2):1600079. doi:10.1002/pmic.201600079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos WM, Tilg H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut. 2022;71(5):1020–32. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter AR, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, Richmond RC, Davey Smith G, Heron J, Taylor AE, Davies NM, Howe LD. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(5):465–78. doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess S, Thompson SG. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(4):251–60. doi:10.1093/aje/kwu283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4(1):7. doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscanoa J, Sivapalan L, Gadaleta E, Dayem Ullah AZ, Lemoine NR, Chelala C. SNPnexus: a web server for functional annotation of human genome sequence variation (2020 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(W1):W185–w192. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-H, Gail MH, Weinberg CR, Carroll RJ, Chung CC, Wang Z, Chanock SJ, Fraumeni JF, Chatterjee N. Distribution of allele frequencies and effect sizes and their interrelationships for common genetic susceptibility variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(44):18026–31. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114759108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden J, Del Greco MF, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N, Thompson J. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. 2017;36(11):1783–802. doi:10.1002/sim.7221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, Zhao Q, Lawlor DA, Sheehan NA, Thompson J, Davey Smith G. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(3):728–42. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(5):693–8. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relton CL, Davey Smith G. Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):161–76. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–91. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):377–89. doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14. doi:10.1002/gepi.21965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu EYW, Dai Y, Wesselius A, van Osch F, Brinkman M, van den Brandt P, Grant EJ, White E, Weiderpass E, Gunter M, et al. Coffee consumption and risk of bladder cancer: a pooled analysis of 501,604 participants from 12 cohort studies in the BLadder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) international study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(6):523–35. doi:10.1007/s10654-019-00597-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niseteo T, Komes D, Belščak-Cvitanović A, Horžić D, Budeč M. Bioactive composition and antioxidant potential of different commonly consumed coffee brews affected by their preparation technique and milk addition. Food Chem. 2012;134(4):1870–7. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Yang W, Petrick JL, Liao LM, Wang W, He N, Campbell PT, Zhang Z-F, Giovannucci E, McGlynn KA, et al. Higher intake of whole grains and dietary fiber are associated with lower risk of liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6388. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26448-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Dong A, Xie K, Yu Y. Dietary supplementation with high fiber alleviates oxidative stress and inflammatory responses caused by severe sepsis in mice without altering microbiome diversity. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1929. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makki K, Deehan EC, Walter J, Bäckhed F. The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(6):705–15. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Zhang W, Li S, Yang H. The role of cholesterol metabolism in cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:219–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg E, Hagberg O, Jahnson S, Ljungberg B. Association between occurrence of urinary bladder cancer and treatment with statin medication. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(2):97–102. doi:10.5152/tud.2019.94495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederberger E, Parnham MJ. The impact of diet and exercise on drug responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7692. doi:10.3390/ijms22147692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landegren U, Hammond M. Cancer diagnostics based on plasma protein biomarkers: hard times but great expectations. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(6):1715–26. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar