Privacy Regimes, Crisis Strategies, and Governments’ Legitimizing of Digital Surveillance Technology: Comparing Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom

References

• Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S., Debesay, J., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2022). Persuasive narrative during the COVID-19 pandemic: Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg’s posts on Facebook. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01051-5
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, V. B. (2011). You, the people: American national identity in presidential rhetoric. Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, C., & Raab, C. (2005). Joined-up government and privacy in the United Kingdom: Managing tensions between data protection and social policy. Part II. Public administration, 83(2), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., & Raab, C. (2006). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, K., & Fonio, C. (2018). Big data, surveillance and crisis management. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, K., Van Brakel, R., Fonio, C., & Wagenaar, P. (2014). Histories of state surveillance in Europe and beyond. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A. T., Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management – public leadership under pressure. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2016). Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management: A time for public administration. Public administration, 94(2), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 crisis: A principled or pragmatist approach? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(8), 1131–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1942155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, C., Lodge, M., & Shields, H. (2023). The Sick Man of Europe: The United Kingdom’s COVID-19 Response. In A. Cheung & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), Crisis Leadership and Public Governance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: International Comparisons (pp. 325–352). World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave, L. A. (2004). Privacy protection in a global context–a comparative overview. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 47(2004), 319–348.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M., & Pazos-Vidal, S. (2021). Assessing the multi-level government response to the COVID-19 crisis: Italy and Spain compared. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(11–12), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1915330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). The coronavirus crisis—crisis communication, meaning-making, and reputation management. International Public Management Journal, 23(5), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1812455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). Scientization under pressure—The problematic role of expert bodies during the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Organization Review, 22(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00605-0
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degli Esposti, S., Ball, K., & Dibb, S. (2021). What’s in it for us? Benevolence, national security, and digital surveillance. Public Administration Review, 81, 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13362 (5)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, D. (1989). Protecting privacy in surveillance societies: The federal republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossheim, K., & Lund-Tønnesen, J. (2023). Digitalization of public sector organizations over time: The applicability of quantitative text analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 208523231183569. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231183569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C., Ejersbo, N., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2020). Unpacking Nordic administrative reforms: Agile and adaptive governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Palaric, E., Rackwitz, M., & Wegrich, K. (2023). A shift in paradigm? Collaborative public administration in the context of national digitalization strategies. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 37(2), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. P., Daughton, S. M., & Lavally, R. (2005). Modern rhetorical criticism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2022). Crisis management and national responses to COVID-19: Global perspectives. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2079692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414088021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, K. M. (2018). Framing mass surveillance: Analyzing New Zealand’s media coverage of the early Snowden files. Journalism, 19(3), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917699238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., Franzke, J., & Dumas, B. P. (2022). Technocratic decision-making in times of crisis? The use of data for scientific policy advice in Germany’s COVID-19 management. Public Organization Review, 22(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00635-8
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., Hellström, M., Ramberg, U., & Reiter, R. (2021). Tracing divergence in crisis governance: Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320979359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2023). Strategic public management in crises. In C. Greve & T. Ysa (Eds.), Handbook on strategic public management (pp. 114–132). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lischka, J. A. (2017). Explicit terror prevention versus vague civil liberty: How the UK broadcasting news (de) legitimatise online mass surveillance since Edward Snowden’s revelations. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1211721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund-Tønnesen, J. (2022). Regulating emerging technology in times of crisis: Digital contact tracing in Norway during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Law & Policy, 44(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund-Tønnesen, J., & Christensen, T. (2023a). The dynamics of governance capacity and legitimacy: The case of a digital tracing technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Public Management Journal, 26(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2112328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund-Tønnesen, J., & Christensen, T. (2023b). Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications from governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Organization Review, 23(2), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00705-5
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C. S., Gadinger, F., & Yildiz, T. (2021). Surveillance under dispute: Conceptualising narrative legitimation politics. European Journal of International Security, 6(2), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli, R., Sarwary, H., Imbusch, P., & Lukas, T. (2016). “Accepting the rules of the game”: Institutional rhetorics in legitimizing surveillance. European Journal for Security Research, 1(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-016-0007-z
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rykkja, L. H., Lægreid, P., & Lise Fimreite, A. (2011). Attitudes towards anti-terror measures: The role of trust, political orientation and civil liberties support. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.586206
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, M. (2015). Patterns of surveillance legitimization. The German discourse on the NSA scandal. Surveillance & Society, 13(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i2.5296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations : Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical Institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative science quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenbro, M., & Wester, M. (2023). Examining legitimacy in government agencies’ crisis communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2127358
   Google Scholar
• Tiainen, M. (2017). (De) Legitimating electronic surveillance: A critical discourse analysis of the Finnish news coverage of the Edward Snowden revelations. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1320296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trüdinger, E.-M., & Steckermeier, L. C. (2017). Trusting and controlling? Political trust, information and acceptance of surveillance policies: The case of Germany. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Wal, Z., Van Den Berg, C., & Haque, M. S. (2021). Comparative public administration in a globalized world: Moving beyond standard assumptions toward increased understanding. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Hammerschmid, G., Rykkja, L. H., & Klijn, E. H. (2024). Collaborating for digital transformation: How internal and external collaboration can contribute to innovate public service delivery. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, E. (2007). Even rules, uneven practices: Opening the ‘black box’ of EU law in action. West European Politics, 30(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar, E. B., & Magnawa, J. P. (2022). Surveillance and pandemic governance in least‐ideal contexts: The Philippine case. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 30(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villius Zetterholm, M., Lin, Y., & Jokela, P. (2021). Digital contact tracing applications during COVID-19: A scoping review about public acceptance. Informatics, 8(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8030048
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K., Bennett, L., & Taylor, G. (2017). The normalization of surveillance and the invisibility of digital citizenship: Media debates after the Snowden revelations. International Journal of Communication, 11, 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, J. Q. (2004). The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. The Yale Law Journal, 113(6), 1151–1221. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J., & Whitford, A. B. (2023). Surveillance as the past and future of public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac022
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, K., & Bygrave, L. A. (2022). Demystifying the modernized European data protection regime: Cross‐disciplinary insights from legal and regulatory governance scholarship. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar