PROJECTILE Point Stem Repairs. Some Examples from Southeastern South America

References

• Bradley, B., & Frison, G. (1987). Projectile points and specialized bifaces from the horner site. In G. Frison, & L. Todd (Eds.), The Horner Site (pp. 199–232). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caggiano, M. A. (1979). Análisis y desarrollo cultural prehispánico en la cuenca inferior del Plata. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. La Plata.
   Google Scholar
• Caggiano, M. A. (1984). Prehistoria del N.E. argentino y sus vinculaciones con la República Oriental del Uruguay y sur de Brasil. Pesquisas, Antropologia, 38, 1–109.
   Google Scholar
• Caldarelli, S. (2010). Arqueologia preventiva na UHE Foz do Chapecó, SC/RS: Relatório Final. Florianópolis, Scientia Consultoria Científica, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonera, M., & Loponte, D. (2021). Raw materials and functional designs of Fishtail projectile points from southern Brazil. Journal of Lithics Studies, 8(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.6169
   Google Scholar
• Cheshier, C., & Kelly, R. L. (2006). Projectile point shape and durability: the effect of thickness, length. American Antiquity, 71(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/40035908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A. S. (2012). Hunter-gatherer occupation of south Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Paleoenvironment and archaeology. Quaternary International, 256, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauvelle, M., Smith, E. M., Brown, S. H., & Des Lauriers, M. R. (2012). Asphaltum hafting and projectile point durability: an experimental comparison of three hafting methods. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(8), 2802–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flenniken, J. J., & Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological projectile point typology: Replication, experimentation, and technological analysis. American Antiquity, 51(3), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.2307/281755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flenniken, J. J., & Wilke, P. J. (1989). Typology, technology, and chronology of great basin dart forms. American Anthropologist, 91(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1989.91.1.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frison, G. C. (1986). Mammoth hunting and butchering from A perspective of African elephant culling. In G. Frison & C. Todd (Eds.), The colby mammoth site, taphonomy and archaeology of a clovis kill in northern Wyoming (pp. 115–134). University of New Mexico & Calvin Horn Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Goulart, M. (1987). A pré-história da volta do Uvá-SC/RS: Barragem Itá. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
   Google Scholar
• Hashizume, J. (2009). Paleoindian projectile point breakage and reshaping. In M. L. Larson, M. Kornfeld, & G. C. Frison (Eds.), Hell Gap: A stratified paleoindian campsite at the edge of the rockies (pp. 274–284). The University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, K. (1991). Aspectos de la arqueología de Uruguay. Verlag von Zabern Manz am Rhein.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. S. (1998). Getting to the point: evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(4), 345–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loponte, D., & Carbonera, M. (2015). Arqueología precolonial De misiones. In V. Bauni & M. Homberg (Eds.), Editorial fundación de historia natural félix de azara, Buenos Aires (pp. 15–38). Veronica Bauna & Marina Holmberg.
   Google Scholar
• Meggers, B., & Evans, C. (1977). Lowlands of South America and antilles. In J. Jennings (Ed.), Ancient native Americans (pp. 543–591). W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mentz Ribeiro, P. A., & Ribeiro, C. T. (1999). Escavações arqueológicas no sítio RS-TQ-58: Montenegro, RS, Brasil. Série Documentos, 10, 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. T. (1967). Pesquisas arqueológicas efetuadas no nordeste do Rio Grande do Sul. In M. Simões (Ed.), Programa nacional de pesquisas arqueológicas: Resultados preliminares do primeiro Ano (1965-1966), publicações avulsas do museu paranaense emílio goeldi 6 (pp. 15–38). Manuel.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. T. (1974). Pesquisas arqueológicas em abrigos-sob-rocha no nordeste do Rio Grande do Sul. In M. Simões (Ed.), Programa nacional de pesquisas arqueológicas: Resultados preliminares do quinto Ano (1969-1970), publicações avulsas do museu paranaense emílio goeldi 26 (pp. 11–24). Manoel.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. T. (1987). Pesquisas arqueológicas paleoindígenas no Brasil Ocidental. Estudios Atacameños, 8, 37–61.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J., & Okumura, M. (2018). The Association of Palaeoindian Sites from Southern Brazil and Uruguay with the Umbu Tradition: comments on Suárez et al. (2017). Quaternary International, 467, 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.11.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno de Sousa, J., & Okumura, M. (2020). A new proposal for the technological analysis of lithic points: Application for understanding the cultural diversity of hunter-gatherers in Eastern South America. Quaternary International, 562, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.07.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. (2007). Research in the middle Negro river basin (Uruguay) and the paleoindian occupation of the southern cone. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1086/510465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. (2013). Archaeology, Paleoindian Research and Lithic Technology in the Middle Negro River, Central Uruguay. Archaeological Discovery, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2013.11001
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. (2021). New morpho-technological studies to enhance the knowledge of fell point variability in Southeastern South America. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, 40(Part A), 103205.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G., & Castro, A. (2010). New paleoindian finds and micro-wear analysis at arroyo cacique site, tacuarembó department, Uruguay. Current Research in the Pleistocene, 27, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H., Loponte, D., & Carbonera, M. (2022). Additional records for deepening the knowledge of fell points from Southeastern South America. PaleoAmerica, 8(4), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2022.2135477
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. C. (1996). Technological strategies responsive to subsistence risk. In B. B. J. Tainter & G. Tainter (Eds.), Evolving complexity and environmental risk in the prehistoric southwest. Vol. XXIV (pp. 109–144). Santa Fe Institute: Studies in the Science of Complexity. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. (2015a). Desconstruindo o que nunca foi construído: pontas bifaciais ‘Umbu’ do Sul e Sudeste do Brasil. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, 20, 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. (2015b). Contributions to the dart versus arrow debate: New data from Holocene projectile points from southeastern and southern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 87(4), 2349–2373. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. G. M. (2013). Pontas bifaciais no Brasil Meridional: caracterização estatística das formas e suas implicações culturais. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, 23(23), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2013.106842
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. G. M. (2014). Long-term cultural stability in hunter-gatherers: a case study using traditional and geometric morphometric analysis of lithic stemmed bifacial points from Southern Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 45, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., & Araujo, A. G. M. (2016). The Southern Divide: testing morphological differences among bifacial points from southern and southeastern Brazil using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Lithic Studies, 3(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v3i1.1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, F. F., & Stearns, S. M. (1992). Two hunting-related archaic sites in Elko County. Falcon Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. A. (2001). Nordeste prehispánico. In E. Berberián & A. Nielsen (Eds.), Historia Argentina prehispánica II (pp. 693–736). Editorial Brujas.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, P. I. (1978). Industrias líticas en el sur de Brasil. Estudios Leopoldenses, 14, 103–132.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, P. I. (1987). Prehistoric hunters and gatherers of Brazil. Journal of World Prehistory, 1(1), 53–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, A. (1972). Líneas fundamentales de la arqueología del Litoral (una tentativa de periodización). Publicación del Instituto de Antropología de la Universidad de Córdoba, 32, 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, R., Piñeiro, G., & Barceló, F. (2017). Living on the river edge: the Tigre site (K-87) new data and implications for the initial colonization of the Uruguay River basin. Quaternary International, 473, 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. H. (1981). How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3(1), 7–43.
   Google Scholar
• Titmus, G. L., & Woods, J. C. (1986). An experimental study of projectile point fracture patterns. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 8(1), 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Towner, R. H., & Warburton, M. (1990). Projectile point rejuvenation: A technological analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology, 17, 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witthoft, J. (1968). Flint arrowoints from Eskimo of northwestern Alaska. Exppedition, 10, 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Zeanah, D., & Elston, R. (2001). Testing a simple hypothesis concerning the resilience of dart point styles to hafting element repair. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 23(1), 93–124.
   Google Scholar