Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas

References

• Bridges EM, Oldeman LR. 1999. Global Assessment of Human Induced Soil Degradation. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 13:4, 319–325, DOI: 10.1080/089030699263212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Geoscience. 2007. Geological data 1:250 000. Council for Geoscience, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis CJ, van Zijl GM, van Tol JJ, Manyevere A. 2020. Machine learning digital soil mapping to inform gully erosion mitigation measures in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Geoderma, 368 (114287). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn T, van Zijl GM, Van Tol JJ, Botha CC, Rozanov A, Warr B, Clarke C. 2019. Comparing algorithms to disaggregate complex soil polygons in contrasting environments. Geoderma 352: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman S, Wischmeier W. 1986. Erosion and sediment control handbook. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelton P, Murphy B. 2007. Interpreting soil test results: what do all the numbers mean? Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hockings M. 2003. Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53(9): 823–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. Update 2015: International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps (World Soil Resources Reports No. 106). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
   Google Scholar
• Kempen B, Brus DJ, Heuvelink GBM, Stoorvogel JJ. 2009. Updating the 1: 50 000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma, 151: 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Type Survey Staff. 1972–2006. Land types of South Africa: Digital map (1:250 000 scale) and soil inventory datasets. ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, An L, Yang J, Zhang H. 2001. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas. Science 292: 98–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopoukhine N, Crawhall N, Dudley N, Figgis P, Karibuhoye C, et al. 2012. Protected areas: providing natural solutions to 21st century challenges. SAPIENS 5: 11–131. https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1254
   Google Scholar
• McBratney AB, Mendoça Santos ML, Minasny B. 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117: 3–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasny B, McBratney AB. 2006. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences. 32, 1378–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds.). 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nortje GP. 2013. Studies on the impacts of off-road driving and the influence of tourists’ consciousness and attitudes on soil compaction and associated vegetation in the Makuleke Contractual Park, Kruger National Park. PhD thesis. University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson L, Barbosa H, Bhadwal S, Cowie A, Delusca K, et al. 2019: Land Degradation. In: Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner H-O, et al. (eds). Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ribas LG, Pressey RL, Loyola R, Bini LM. 2020. A global comparative analysis of impact evaluation methods in estimating the effectiveness of protected area. Biological Conservation 246: 108595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes R, Montanarella L, Brainich A, Barger N, ten Brink B, et al. 2018. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze RE. 2007. South African atlas of climatology and agrohydrology (WRC report 1489/1/06). Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Classification Working Group (SCWG). 2018. Soil classification: a natural and anthropogenic system for South Africa. Pretoria: ARC–Institute for Soil, Climate and Water.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2021. Accounts for Protected Areas, 1900 to 2020 (Natural Capital Series 2: Discussion document D0401.2). Produced in collaboration with the South African National Biodiversity Institute and the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1997. World atlas of desertification (2nd edn). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM, Smith HJC, Le Roux PAL. 2012. Rapid soil mapping under restrictive conditions in Tete, Mozambique. In: Minasny B, McBratney AB, Malone B (eds), Digital soil assessments and beyond. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 335–340.
   Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM, Le Roux PAL. 2014. Creating a hydrological soil map for the Stevenson Hamilton Supersite, Kruger National Park. Water SA 40(2): 331–336. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v40i2.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM, Ellis F, Rozanov DA. 2014a. Soil properties affecting gully erosion in a severely degraded catchment in Lesotho. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 31(3): 163–172. http://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2014.944228
   Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM, Bouwer D, Van Tol JJ, Le Roux PAL. 2014b. Functional digital soil mapping: a case study from Namarroi, Mozambique. Geoderma 219-220: 155–161. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM. 2019. Digital soil mapping approaches to address real world problems in southern Africa. Geoderma 337: 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zijl GM, Van Tol JJ, Bouwer D, Lorentz S, Le Roux PAL. 2020. Combining historical remote sensing, digital soil mapping and hydrological modelling to produce solutions for infrastructure damage in Cosmo City, South Africa. Remote Sensing 12: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira RRS, Pressey RL, Loyola R. 2019. The residual nature of protected areas in Brazil. Biological Conservation 233: 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu A-X. 1997. A similarity model for representing soil spatial information. Geoderma 77: 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar