122
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Geopolitics of cryptocurrency mining in Kazakhstan

ORCID Icon
Received 10 Jun 2023, Accepted 02 Feb 2024, Published online: 04 Apr 2024

References

  • Ambalov, V., and I. Heim. 2020. “Investments in the Digital Silk Road.” In Kazakhstan’s Diversification from the Natural Resources Sector: Strategic and Economic Opportunities, edited by I. Heim. Euro-Asian Studies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37389-4.
  • Ash, J., R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski. 2018. “Digital Turn, Digital Geographies?” Progress in Human Geography 42 (1), SAGE Publications Ltd: 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800.
  • Assembayeva, M., J. Egerer, R. Mendelevitch, and N. Zhakiyev. 2018. “A Spatial Electricity Market Model for the Power System: The Kazakhstan Case Study.” Energy 149 (April): 762–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.011.
  • Bakis, H. 2013. “Les Facteurs de Localisation D’un Nouveau Type D’établissements Tertiaires : Les Datacentres.” Netcom. Réseaux, communication et territoires (27-3/4), (October). Netcom Association: 351—384. https://doi.org/10.4000/netcom.1473.
  • Baldakova, O. 2022. “Kazakhstan’s Three-Way Balancing Act Between Competing Powers Is Under Pressure.” In Beyond Blocs. Global Views on China and US-China Relations, edited by H. Legarda, and J. Gunter, 45–53. MERICS Papers on China 11.
  • Cattaruzza, A. 2012. “«Zones Grises », Interstices Durables de la Carte Politique ? Relecture Critique D’un Concept Géopolitique [‘Grey Zones,’ Sustainable Interstices of the Political map? Critical Reassessment of a Geopolitical Concept].” Bulletin de l’Association de géographes français 89 (1): 104–120. https://doi.org/10.3406/bagf.2012.8247.
  • Cheng, J., and J. Zeng. 2023. “‘Digital Silk Road’ as a Slogan Instead of a Grand Strategy.” Journal of Contemporary China 0 (0), Routledge: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2222269.
  • de Vries, A., U. Gallersdörfer, L. Klaaßen, and C. Stoll. 2022. “Revisiting Bitcoin’s Carbon Footprint.” Joule 6 (3): 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.005.
  • Enegix website: https://enegix.net/en
  • Estecahandy, H. 2023. “Entre Tensions électriques et Géopolitiques : Les Enjeux énergétiques et de Ressources en Asie Centrale au Prisme du Minage de Cryptomonnaies [Between Electrical and Geopolitical Tensions: Energy and Resource Issues in Central Asia Through the Lens of Cryptocurrency Mining].” Hérodote N° 188 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.3917/her.188.0091.
  • Estecahandy, H. 2021. “Minage de Cryptomonnaies à Irkoutsk: Facteurs, Limites et Enjeux du Développement de Cette Industrie Numérique Alternative au Sein D’un Territoire Sibérien Marginalisé [Cryptocurrencies Mining in Irkutsk: Factors, Limits and Stakes of Development of This Alternative Digital Industry Within a Marginalized Siberian Territory].” EchoGéo (56), (May). https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.21699.
  • Fan, S., E. Gyllensvärd, E. Farkas, and J. Schutzner. 2022. “Intervention for Cryptocurrency Emissions: A China Case Study.”.
  • Fauve, A. 2013. “La Construction D’une Capitale Nationale en Régime Autoritaire : Astana au Kazakhstan. [Building a National Capital City Under Authoritarian Rule: Astana in Kazakhstan].” (PhD thesis). Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris.
  • Global Energy Monitor: https://globalenergymonitor.org/
  • Huang, Y., and M. Mayer. 2022. “Digital Currencies, Monetary Sovereignty, and U.S.—China Power Competition.” Policy & internet 14 (2): 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.302.
  • Isaacs, R. 2011. Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics. 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826003.
  • Kalmykov, D. E., and A. D. Malikova. 2017. Doomed to Coal. Karaganda: Center for the New Environmentally Friendly Technologies—CINEST.
  • Koch, N., and V.-P. Tynkkynen. 2021. “The Geopolitics of Renewables in Kazakhstan and Russia.” Geopolitics 26 (2): 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1583214.
  • Köhler, S., and M. Pizzol. 2019. “Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining.” Environmental science & technology 9: 13598−13606.
  • Kudaibergenova, D. 2016. “Nationalizing Elites and Regimes. Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Authoritarian and Democratic Contexts.” In Kazakhstan in the Making: Legitimacy, Symbols, and Social Changes, edited by M. Laruelle, 113–129. Contemporary Central Asia: Societies, Politics, and Culture. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Lacoste, Y. 1976. La Géographie, ça Sert, D’abord, à Faire la Guerre [Geography, first and foremost, is for making war]. Ed. Paris: Maspero.
  • Laruelle, M. 2019. “On Track to a Kazakh Spring?” The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/on-track-to-a-kazakh-spring/.
  • Ledeneva, A. V. 1999. Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Exchange.. Cambridge Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies 102. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Loyer, B. 2019. Géopolitique—Méthodes et Concepts: Méthodes et Concepts [Geopolitics—Methods and Concepts]. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Martin, C. 2022. “Geopolitics and Digital Sovereignty.” In Perspectives on Digital Humanism, edited by H. Werthner, E. Prem, E. A. Lee, and C. Ghezzi. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5.
  • Maurer, B., T. C. Nelms, and L. Swartz. 2013. “‘When Perhaps the Real Problem Is Money Itself!’: The Practical Materiality of Bitcoin.” Social Semiotics 23 (2): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.777594.
  • Minassian, G. 2011. Zones Grises: Quand les États Perdent le Contrôle [Gray areas: when States are Losing Control]. Paris: Autrement.
  • Nakamoto, S. 2008. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  • Open Infrastructure Map: https://openinframap.org/
  • Open Street Map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/
  • Peyrouse, S. 2009. “The Central Asian Power Grid in Danger?” The Central-Asia Caucasus Analyst. http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/11960-analytical-articles635.
  • Rusinovich, D. 2023. Geopolitics & Bitcoin Mining. Berlin: Cryptocurrency Mining Group—I&D Media und Project Advisory GmbH. https://cryptocurrencymining.group/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ID_Market_Insights_Geopolitics-BTC-Mining-230512.pdf.
  • Schatz, E. 2004. “What Capital Cities Say About State and Nation Building.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9 (4): 111–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537110390444140.
  • Serada, A. 2020. “The Continuous Materiality of Blockchain.” In Konferenzband Zum Scientific Track Der Blockchain Autumn School 2020, 71–76. Mittweida: Hochschule Mittweida, University of Applied Sciences. https://www.forschung.hs-mittweida.de/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1606201402&hash=63990e96a87b4fa53396afebcabe99e4f26f4f52&file=fileadmin/verzeichnisfreigaben/forschng/dokumente/Scientific_Reports/Scientific_Reports_2020/Tagungsband_Blockchain_2020.pdf.
  • Westphal, K., M. Pastukhova, and J. M. Pepe. 2022. “Geopolitics of Electricity: Grids, Space and (Political) Power”. No. 6/2022. SWP Research Paper.
  • Wyeth, R., L. Rella, and E. Atkins. 2023. “The Material Geographies of Bitfury in Georgia: Integrating Cryptoasset Firms Into Global Financial Networks.” Environment and Planning: Economy and Space, November. 0308518X231211789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231211789.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.