Professional development partnership between urban middle school science teachers and informal science institutions

References

• Adams, Jennifer D., and Preeti Gupta. 2017. “Informal Science Institutions and Learning to Teach: An Examination of Identity, Agency, and Affordances.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (1): 121–138. doi:10.1002/tea.21270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderhag, Per, Per‐Olof Wickman, Kerstin Bergqvist, Britt Jakobson, Karim Mikael Hamza, and Roger Säljö. 2016. “Why Do Secondary School Students Lose Their Interest in Science? or Does It Never Emerge? A Possible and Overlooked Explanation.” Science Education 100 (5): 791–813. doi:10.1002/sce.21231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, Adriana E., Angela M. Kelly, and Gillian U. Bayne. 2010. “Sharing Our Teachers: The Required Graduate Class at the American Museum of Natural History for Lehman College (CUNY).” The New Educator 6 (3/4): 225–246. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2010.10399603.
   Google Scholar
• Astor‐Jack, Tamsin, Ellen McCallie, and Phyllis Balcerzak. 2007. “Academic and Informal Science Education Practitioner Views about Professional Development in Science Education.” Science Education 91 (4): 604–628. doi:10.1002/sce.20205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, Lucy. 2015. “Reconceptualizing Elementary Teacher Preparation: A Case for Informal Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (1): 108–135. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.969358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, Hilda. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2021. “Can I Use TA? Should I Use TA? Comparing Reflexive Thematic Analysis and Other Pattern-Based Qualitative Approaches.” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21 (1): 37–47. doi:10.1002/capr.12360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, Sandhya D., and Richard K. Coll. 2018. “Using Blended Learning and Out-of-School Visits: Pedagogies for Effective Science Teaching in the Twenty-First Century.” Research in Science and Technological Education 36 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1393658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W., and Dana L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, Mira, and Heather McKenzie. 2006. “The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-Based Qualitative Research.” Social Science Information 45 (4): 483–499. doi:10.1177/0539018406069584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, Jacquelynne S., and Allan Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, William A. 2014. “Teacher Evaluation Policy and Conflicting Theories of Motivation.” Educational Researcher 43 (2): 100–107. doi:10.3102/0013189X14521864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Constance T. 2009. “Bracketing in Qualitative Research: Conceptual and Practical Matters.” Psychotherapy Research 19 (4–5): 583–590. doi:10.1080/10503300902798375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman-Shaharabani, Yael, and Tali Tal. 2017. “Teachers’ Practice a Decade after an Extensive Professional Development Program in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 47 (5): 1031–1053. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9539-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigante, Nancy A., and William A. Firestone. 2008. “Administrative Support and Teacher Leadership in Schools Implementing Reform.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (3): 302–331. doi:10.1108/09578230810869266.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. 2010. “The Future of Grounded Theory.” Grounded Theory Review 9 (2): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, Karen, Anna MacPherson, Maritza Macdonald, Hudson Roditi, and Linda Curtis-Bey. 2017. “What Does It Take to Sustain a Productive Partnership in Education?” Phi Delta Kappan 99 (1): 15–20. doi:10.1177/0031721717728272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia, Sara C., and Julie H. Yu. 2017. “A Matter of Choice: Opportunities for Informal Science Institutions to Support Science Teacher Induction.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 28 (6): 549–565. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2017.1388085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Carla C., and Sherry Marx. 2009. “Transformative Professional Development: A Model for Urban Science Education Reform.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (2): 113–134. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9127-x.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Angela M., Serigne M. Gningue, and Gaoyin Qian. 2015. “First-Year Urban Mathematics and Science Teachers: Classroom Challenges and Reflective Solutions.” Education and Urban Society 47 (2): 132–159. doi:10.1177/0013124513489147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomen, Michele Hollingsworth, Robert Blair, Elisabeth Young-Isebrand, and Karen S. Oberhauser. 2014. “Science Professional Development with Teachers: Nurturing the Scientist Within.” The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education 18 (6). http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/12799
   Google Scholar
• Loucks‐Horsley, Susan, and Carolee Matsumoto. 1999. “Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene.” School Science and Mathematics 99 (5): 258–271. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.x.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J. Randy, Emily Hestness, Kelly Riedinger, Phyllis Katz, Gili Marbach-Ad, and Amy Dai. 2012. “Informal Science Education in Formal Science Teacher Preparation.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry Fraser, Kenneth Tobin, and Campbell J. McRobbie, 1097–1108, Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, Luisa, Angela M. Kelly, and M. David Burghardt. 2018. “Professional Development for a Middle School Mathematics-Infused Science Curriculum.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 29 (8): 804–828. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2018.1514825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, Jessica A., and Angela M. Kelly. 2021. “Science Teacher Motivation and Evaluation Policy in a High-Stakes Testing State.” Educational Policy 35 (1): 3–40. doi:10.1177/0895904818810520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2000. Mathematics and Science in the Eighth Grade: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Washington, DC, USA: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2012. “The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011.” (NCES 2012-465). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2015. Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in Out-of-School Settings. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nehmeh, Ghada, and Angela M. Kelly. 2018. “Urban Science Teachers in Isolation: Challenges, Resilience, and Adaptive Action.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 29 (6): 527–549. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2018.1474425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York State Education Department. 2016. New York State P-12 Science Learning Standards. Albany, NY, USA: New York State Education Department.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Michelle, Doreen Finkelstein, and Saundra Wever‐Frerichs. 2007. “School Site to Museum Floor: How Informal Science Institutions Work with Schools.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (12): 1489–1507. doi:10.1080/09500690701494084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). 2010. Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s Future. Washington, DC, USA: Office of Science and Technology Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Provasnik, Stephen, David Kastberg, David Ferraro, Nita Lemanski, Stephen Roey, and Frank Jenkins. 2012. “Highlights from TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and Science Achievement of US Fourth-and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context.” NCES 2013-009. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Ralph T., and Hilda Borko. 2000. “What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning?” Educational Researcher 29 (1): 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, Leonie J. 2014. “Learning Science outside of School.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell, 120–144, New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riedinger, Kelly. 2015. “Identity Development of Youth during Participation at an Informal Science Education Camp.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10 (3): 453–475. doi:10.12973/ijese.2015.254a.
   Google Scholar
• Rinke, Carol R. 2009. “Finding Their Way On: Career Decision‐Making Processes of Urban Science Teachers.” Science Education 93 (6): 1096–1121. doi:10.1002/sce.20339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, Susan M., Leonie J. Rennie, and John K. Gilbert. 2010. “The Roles of the Formal and Informal Sectors in the Provision of Effective Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260903562284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, William. 2001. “Science Education as a Civil Right: Urban Schools and Opportunity-to-Learn Considerations.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (9): 1015–1028. doi:10.1002/tea.1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban Advantage Science Initiative (UASI). 2017. “Urban Advantage Science Initiative.” Urban Advantage Science Initiative. https://www.urbanadvantagenyc.org
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Meryle, Emily Ruble Whitesell, and Amy Ellen Schwartz. 2014. “Museums, Zoos, and Gardens: How Formal-Informal Partnerships Can Impact Urban Students’ Performance in Science.” Evaluation Review 38 (6): 514–545. doi:10.1177/0193841X14553299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitesell, Emily Ruble. 2016. “A Day at the Museum: The Impact of Field Trips on Middle School Science Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (7): 1036–1054. doi:10.1002/tea.21322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerrick, Randy, and Danielle Beatty-Adler. 2011. “Addressing Equity and Diversity with Teachers though Informal Science Institutions and Teacher Professional Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22 (3): 229–253. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9226-3.
   Google Scholar