Technology teachers’ talk about knowledge: from uncertainty to technology education competence

References

• Allen, Mike 2017. “The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods.” SAGE Publications, . https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=cat00115a&AN=lkp.1028199&lang=sv&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Barlex, David. 2009. “Preparing D&T for 2005-Moving beyond the Rhetoric the DATA Lecture.” Journal of Design & Technology Education 5 (1): 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert, Mark Priestley, and Sarah Robinson. 2017. “Talking about Education: Exploring the Significance of Teachers’ Talk for Teacher Agency.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 49 (1): 38–54. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, Helen, Nina Kilbrink, and Niklas Gericke. 2021. “Teaching Digital Models: Secondary Technology Teachers’ Experiences.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (1). doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09659-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakers, John. 2006. Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Marc. J. 2005. “The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Philosophical Reflections and Educational Consequences.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 149–154. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8276-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, Marc J. 2016. Teaching about Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-philosophers. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DiGironimo, Nicole. 2011. “What Is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions about the Nature of Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1337–1352. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.495400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Andrew, Niall Seery, Donal Canty, and Jeffrey Buckley. 2019. “Agendas, Influences, and Capability: Perspectives on Practice in Design and Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 29 (1): 143–159. doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9433-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Andrew, Niall Seery, and Lena Gumaelius. 2019. “Operationalising Pedagogical Content Knowledge Research in Technology Education: Considerations for Methodological Approaches to Exploring Enacted Practice.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (4): 755–769. doi:10.1002/berj.3524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrman, Birgit 2021. To know a subject - Teachers’ views about the subject of technology. : How the subject of technology is described and approached by teachers in the lower secondary school. (Licentiate dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-294564
   Google Scholar
• Fahrman, Birgit, Per Norström, Lena Gumaelius, and Inga-Britt Skogh. 2020. “Experienced Technology Teachers’ Teaching Practices.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30 (1): 163–186. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09494-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Thomas P. 2004. Human-built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hultén, Magnus. 2019. Striden om den goda skolan. Hur kunskapsfrågan enat, splittrat och förändrat svensk skola och skoldebatt. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. 2020. Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education. https://www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Edgar W. 1997. “Technological Literacy: Concepts and Constructs.” The Journal of Technology Studies 23 (1): 2–5. doi:10.21061/jots.v23i1.a.1.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alsiter, Cathy Buntting, and Marc J. de Vries. 2013. “The Developing Field of Technology Education: A Review to Look Forward.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 (2): 191–212. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9174-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, Richard. 1998. Developing Questions for Focus Groups. Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. 2005. “What is competence?” Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, Richard. 2006. “Modeling Students Modeling Abilities: The Teaching and Learning of Complex Systems in Education.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlöf, Charlotta, Per Norström, Gunnar Höst, and Jonas Hallström. 2021. “Towards a Three-part Heuristic Framework for Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09664-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norström, Per. 2014. “How Technology Teachers Understand Technological Knowledge.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 24 (1): 19–38. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9243-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Council, Swedish. (2017). Good research practice. https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1555334908942/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ropohl, Günter. 1997. “Knowledge Types in Technology.“ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7 (1): 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rossouw Ammeret, Michael Hacker, and Marc J. de Vries. 2011. “Concepts and Contexts in Engineering and Technology Education: An International and Interdisciplinary Delphi Study.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (4): 409–424. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9129-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. 2014. “Teknik – Gör det osynliga synligt.” [Technology - make the invisible visible] http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/publikationssok/granskningsrapporter/kvalitetsgranskningar/2014/teknik/kvalgr-teknik-slutrapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket 2017. Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 [ Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011]. https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/grundskolan/laroplan-och-kursplaner-for-grundskolan/laroplan-lgr11-for-grundskolan-samt-for-forskoleklassen-och-fritidshemmet
   Google Scholar
• Stoor, Markus, and Oleg Popov. 2021. “Societal Aspects of Technology: The Swedish Lower Secondary School Curricula in International Comparison.” Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science 28 (2): 140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Turri, John. 2012. “Is Knowledge Justified True Belief?” Synthese 184 (3): 247–259. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9773-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenti, Walter G. 1990. What Engineers Know and How They Know It . Vol. 141. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, Victoria, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren, and Gunilla Öberg. 2007. “Learning in Focus Groups: An Analytical Dimension for Enhancing Focus Group Research.” Qualitative Research 7 (2): 249–267. doi:10.1177/1468794107076023.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. John. 2017. “Critique as a Disposition.” In Critique in Design and Technology Education, edited by P. Williams and K. Stables, 135–152. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Xia, and Bangping Ding. 2020. “Technology Teachers’ Conceptions of Technology Teaching in Secondary Schools in Beijing: A Phenomenographic Analysis”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1–25. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09629-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar