1,755
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Scaling up a life sciences college career exploration course to foster STEM confidence and career self-efficacy

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Belser, C., D. Prescod, A. Daire, M. Dagley, and C. Young. 2017. “Predicting Undergraduate Student Retention in STEM Majors Based on Career Development Factors.” Career Development Quarterly 65 (1): 88–93. doi:10.1002/cdq.12082.
  • Belser, C., D. Prescod, A. Daire, M A Dagley, and C. Young. 2018. “The Influence of Career Planning on Career Thoughts in STEM-interested Undergraduates.” The Career Development Quarterly 66 (2): 176–181. doi:10.1002/cdq.12131.
  • Blustein, D. 1989. “The Role of Goal Instability and Career Self-Efficacy in the Career Exploration Process.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 35 (2): 194–203. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(89)90040-7.
  • Bowen, G. 2008. “Naturalistic Inquiry and the Saturation Concept: A Research Note.” Qualitative Research 8 (1): 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301.
  • Creswell, J. W., and J.D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Cromley, J. G., T. Perez, and A. Kaplan. 2016. “Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1177/2372732215622648.
  • Estrada, M., A. Woodcock, P. Hernandez, and P. Schultz. 2011. “Toward a Model of Social Influence that Explains Minority Student Integration into the Scientific Community.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1): 206–222. doi:10.1037/a0020743.
  • Feller, R. 2011. “Advancing the STEM Workforce through STEM-Centric Career Development.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 71 (1): 6–12.
  • Folsom, B., and R. Reardon. 2003. “College Career Courses: Design and Accountability.” Journal of Career Assessment 11 (4): 421–450. doi:10.1177/1069072703255875.
  • Fouad, N., E. Cotter, and N. Kantamneni. 2009. “The Effectiveness of a Career Decision-Making Course.” Journal of Career Assessment 17 (3): 338–347. doi:10.1177/1069072708330678.
  • Fouad, N., and M. Santana. 2017. “SCCT and Underrepresented Populations in STEM Fields: Moving the Needle.” Journal of Career Assessment 25 (1): 24–39. doi:10.1177/1069072716658324.
  • Freeman, S., S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
  • Graham, M., J. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A. Hunter, and J. Handelsman. 2013. “Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM.” Science 341 (6153): 1455–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1240487.
  • Hansen, M. J., and J. S. Pedersen. 2012. “An Examination of the Effects of Career Development Courses on Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, Adjustment to College, Learning Integration, and Academic Success.” Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 24 (2): 33–61.
  • Hunter, A.-B., S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. 2007. “Becoming a Scientist: The Role of Undergraduate Research in Students’ Cognitive, Personal, and Professional Development.” Science Education 91 (1): 36–74. doi:10.1002/sce.20173.
  • Jones, B., M. Paretti, S. Hein, and T. Knott. 2010. “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (4): 319–336. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x.
  • Kanny, M. A., L. J. Sax, and T. A. Riggers-Piehl. 2014. “Investigating Forty Years of STEM Research: How Explanations for the Gender Gap Have Evolved over Time.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 20 (2): 127–148. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007246.
  • Komarraju, M., J. Swanson, and D. Nadler. 2014. “Increased Career Self-Efficacy Predicts College Students’ Motivation, and Course and Major Satisfaction.” Journal of Career Assessment 22 (3): 420–432. doi:10.1177/1069072713498484.
  • Laursen, S. L., A.-B. Hunter, E. Seymour, H. Thiry, and G. Melton. 2010. Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lent, R., S. Brown, and G. Hackett. 1994. “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 45 (1): 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
  • Lent, R. W., H. B. Sheu, M. J. Miller, M. E. Cusick, L. T. Penn, and N. N. Truong. 2018. “Predictors of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Choice Options: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of the Social-Cognitive Choice Model by Gender and Race/Ethnicity.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 65 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1037/cou0000243.
  • Litzler, E., C. Samuelson, and J. Lorah. 2014. “Breaking It Down: Engineering Student STEM Confidence at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Gender.” Research in Higher Education 55 (8): 810–832. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9333-z.
  • Merriam, S. B. 2002. “Introduction to Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, edited by S. B. Merriam, 3–17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Monks, J., and R. M. Schmidt. 2011. “The Impact of Class Size on Outcomes in Higher Education.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 11 (1): 1–17. doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2803.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2016. Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’ Diverse Pathways. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21739.
  • National Science Board (NSB). 2019. “The Skilled Technical Workforce: Crafting America’s Science & Engineering Enterprise”. NSB-2019-23. Accessed 1 September 2020. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2019/nsb201923.pdf
  • Prescod, D., A. Daire, C. Young, M. Dagley, and M. Georgiopoulos. 2018. “Exploring Negative Career Thoughts between STEM-Declared and STEM-Interested Students.” Journal of Employment Counseling 55 (4): 166–175. doi:10.1002/joec.12096.
  • Prescod, D., B. Gilfillan, C. Belser, R. Orndorff, and M. Ishler. 2019. “Career Decision-Making for Undergraduates Enrolled in Career Planning Courses.” College Quarterly 22 (2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1221402.pdf
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office of Science and Technology.
  • Reese, R., and C. Miller. 2006. “Effects of a University Career Development Course on Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Career Assessment 14 (2): 252–266. doi:10.1177/1069072705274985.
  • Rittmayer, A. D., and M. E. Beier. 2008. Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. Accessed 1 September 2020. http://aweonline.org/arp_selfefficacy_overview_122208.pdf
  • Saldaña, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Schunk, D. 1991. “Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3–4): 207–231. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603and4_2.
  • Scott, A. B., and K. D. Ciani. 2008. “Effects of an Undergraduate Career Class on Men’s and Women’s Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy and Vocational Identity.” Journal of Career Development 34 (3): 263–285. doi:10.1177/0894845307311248.
  • Seymour, E., and N. M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Seymour, E., and A.-B. Hunter, eds. 2019. Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. New York: Springer.
  • Seymour, E., A.-B. Hunter, and T. J. Weston. 2019. “Why We are Still Talking about Leaving.” In Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, edited by E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter, 1–53. New York: Springer.
  • Sheu, H., R. Lent, M. Miller, L. Penn, M. Cusick, and N. Truong. 2018. “Sources of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Domains: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 109: 118–136. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.003.
  • Sithole, A., E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. M. Mupinga, B. K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige. 2017. “Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges.” Higher Education Studies 7 (1): 46–59.
  • Tanner, K. D. 2013. “Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 12: 322–331.
  • Thiry, H., S. L. Laursen, and A.-B. Hunter. 2011. “What Experiences Help Students Become Scientists? A Comparative Study of Research and Other Sources of Personal and Professional Gains for STEM Undergraduates.” Journal of Higher Education 82 (4): 357–388. doi:10.1080/00221546.2011.11777209.
  • Weston, T. J., E. Seymour, A. K. Koch, and B. M. Drake. 2019. “Weed-Out Classes and Their Consequences.” In Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, edited by E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter, 197–244. New York: Springer.