Teachers’ self-efficacy and role when teaching STEM in high-tech informal learning environments

References

• Al Bataineh, M., and S. Anderson. 2015. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Competency Needed for Implementing Technology in the Classroom.” Contemporary Educational Technology 6 (1): 38–61. doi:10.30935/cedtech/6138.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. E., M. Borrego, and A. Boklage. 2021. “Self-efficacy and Belonging: The Impact of a University Makerspace.” International Journal of STEM Education 8 (24). doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., J. P. Gutwil, M. Petrich, and K. Wilkinson. 2015. “Learning through STEM-rich Tinkering: Findings from a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken up in Practice.” Science Education 99 (1): 98–120. doi:10.1002/sce.21151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. 2013. “Digital Fabrication and “Making” in Education: The Democratization of Invention.” In FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers, and Inventors, edited by J. Walter-Herrmann and C. Büching. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript 1–21 .
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, F., T. Soster, and P. Blikstein 2019. “Sorry, I Was in Teacher Mode Today”: Pivotal Tensions and Contradictory Discourses in real-world Implementations of School Makerspaces.” In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (Fablearn 2019). ACM, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti, G. 2013. Is it a Hackerspace, Makerspace, TechShop or FabLab? Accessed 1 September 2019. https://makezine.com/2013/05/22/the-difference-between-hackerspaces-Makerspaces-techshops-and-fablabs/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. 2017. Hackerspaces: Making the Maker Movement. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2019. STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics. Retrieved from https://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/nl/stem
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. 2013. “The Maker Mindset.” In Design, Make, Play. Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, edited by M. Honey and D.E. Kanter, 7–11. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• El-Deghaidy, H., and N. Mansour. 2015. “Science Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Education Possibilities and Challenges.” International Journal of Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., C. Heath, P. Ljungstrand, and P. Parnes. 2018. “Makerspace in school-Considerations from a large-scale National Testbed.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 16: 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2010. “Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs and Culture Intersect.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42 (3): 255–284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2022. Definitions. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-youth-foundation/definitions
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A., S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, A. Davies, and C. Hall Giesinger 2017. “NMC/COSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Education.” Austin, Texas: New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. E., C. Baker, B. D. Thomas, C. Whitfield, and L. Garcia. 2014. “Transforming Technology Integration: An Instrument to Measure Educator’s self-efficacy for Modelling 21st Century Skills.” National Teacher Education Journal 7 (3): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. A. 2005. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your desktop-from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Godhe, A-L., P. Lilja, and N. Selwyn. 2019. “Making Sense of Making: Critical Issues in the Intergration of Maker Education into Schools.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 28 (3): 317–328. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2019.1610040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. 2012. “Exploring and Scaffolding Learning, Interactions between Teachers, Students and Museum Educators.” In Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums. Approaching Sociocultural Perspectives, edited by E. Davidsson and A. Jakobsson. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers 115–128 .
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., C. McDonald Connor, Y. Yang, A.D. Roehring, and F. J. Morrison. 2012. “The Effects of Teacher Qualification, Teacher self-efficacy, and Classroom Practices on Fifth Graders’ Literacy Outcomes.” Elementary School Journal 113 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1086/665816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 1988. “Teacher Efficacy, self-concept, and Attitudes toward the Implementation of Instructional Innovation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 4 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. R., and K. M. Sheridan. 2014. “The Maker Movement in Education.” Harvard Educational Review 84 (4): 495–504. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, I., and S. E. Papert 1991. “Constructionism.” Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. 2017. “Technology Literacy for Teachers.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (3): 365–378. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1305057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2000/2007. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: ITEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kajamaa, A., K. Kumpulainen, and H-R. Olkinuora. 2020. “Teachers Interventions in Students’ Collaborative Work in a technology-rich Educational Makerspace.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (2): 371–386. doi:10.1111/bjet.12837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S., A. Åkerfeldt, A. Mannila, and P. Parnes. 2018. “Makerspaces across Setting: Didactic Design for Programming in Formal and Informal Teacher Education in the Nordic Countries.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 34 (1): 18–30. doi:10.1080/21532974.2017.1387831.
   Google Scholar
• Knipprath, H., L. Thibaut, M.-P. Buyse, S. Ceuppens, H. De Loof, J. De Meester, L. Goovaerts, et al. 2018. “STEM Education in Flanders: How STEM School Aims to Foster STEM Literacy and a Positive Attitude Towards STEM.” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. T., and A. A. Stachowski. 2013. “Respondent Rationale for neither Agreeing nor Disagreeing: Person and Item Contributors to Middle Category Endorsement Intent on Likert Personality Indicators.” Journal of Research in Personality 47 (4): 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künsting, J., V. Neuber, and F. Lipowsky. 2016. “Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term Predictor of Instructional Quality in the Classroom.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 31 (3): 299–322. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, S. L., and G. S. Stager. 2013. “Invent to Learn: A Guide to Why Making Should Be in.” In Every Class. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maslyk, J. 2016. STEAM Makers. Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Elementary Classroom. California: SAGE Publication Ltd. Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Morag, O., and T. Tal. 2012. “Assessing Learning in the Outdoors with Field Trip in Natural Environments (Fine) Framework.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (5): 745–777. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.599046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1993. “The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computers.” New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., E. R. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai. 2016a. “Makeology. Makerspaces as Learning Environments.” In Volume, 1–11. Vol 1. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., E. R. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai. 2016b. “Makeology.” In Makers as Learners, 1–9. Vol 2. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrich, M., K. Wilkinson, and B. Bevan. 2013. “It Looks like Fun, but are They Learning?” In Design. Make. Play. Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, edited by M. Honey and D. E. Kanter, 50–70. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J. 2014. “Learning Science outside of School.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by N. G. Lederman and S. K. Abell, 120–144. Vol 2. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., and E. Rosenbaum. 2013. “Designing for Tinkerability.” In Design, Make, Play, edited by M. Resnick and E. Rosenbaum, 163–181, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, P., F. Ferretti, A. G. Pereira, F. Panella, and M. Wanner. 2017. Overview of the Maker Movement in the European Union, EUR 28686. Luxembourg: EN, Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. O., E. P. Clapp, J. Ross, and S. Tishman. 2016. “Making, Thinking and Understanding. A Dispositional Approach to maker-centered Learning.” In Makeology. Makers as Learners, edited by K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai, 29–44. Vol 2. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K. M., E. R. Halverson, L. Brahms, B. K. Litts, L. Jacobs-Priebe, and T. Owens. 2014. “Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces.” Harvard Educational Review 84 (4): 505–531. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2018. Förändringar och digital kompetens i styrdokument. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/temasidor/digitalisering/digital-kompetens#h-Forandringaristyrdokumenten
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. 2018. “Improving pre-service Teachers’ self-efficacy on Technology Integration through Service Learning.” Canadian Journal of Action Research 19 (1): 22–32. doi:10.33524/cjar.v19i1.373.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., and M. C. Wang. 1988. “Teacher Development and School Improvement: The Process of Teacher Change.” Teaching and Teacher Education 4 (2): 171–187. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(88)90016-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. 2016. “Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument: How to Test the Validation of a questionnaire/survey in a Research.” International Journal of Academic Research in Management 5 (3): 2296.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, R., Y. Bamberger, and O. Morag. 2005. “Guided School Visits to Natural History Museums in Israel: Teachers’ Roles.” Science Education 89 (6): 920–935. doi:10.1002/sce.20070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M. 2019. “When Makerspaces Meet School: Negotiating Tensions between Instruction and Construction.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 28 (2): 75–89. doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9749-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannatta, R., and N. Fordham. 2004. “Teacher Dispositions as Predictors of Classroom Technology Use.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 (3): 253–271. doi:10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnova. 2018. Makespace i skolan. Retrieved from https://www.vinnova.se/p/Makerspace-i-skolan2/
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., P. K. Hooper, and M. Escudé. 2016. “Making through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity.” Harvard Educational Review 86 (2): 206–232. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R, A Ferrari, and Y Punie. 2019. “Makerspaces for Education and Training – Exploring Future Implications for Europe European Union.” Eur 29819. EN, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. JRC117481
   Google Scholar
• Walan, S., and N. Gericke. 2019. “Factors from Informal Learning Contributing to the Children’s Interest in STEM – Experiences from the out-of-school Activity Called Children’s University.” Research in Science & Technological Education. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1667321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walan, S. 2020. “Transfer of Activities from Innovative Environments Such as Makerspaces to Classrooms.” In Science and Mathematics Education for 21 ^St Century Citizens. Challenges and Ways Forward, edited by L. Leite, E. Oldham, A. S. Afonso, F. Viseu, L. Dourado, and M. H. Martinho, 111–129. New York: Nova Science Publishers, .
   Google Scholar
• Wardrip, P. S., and L. Brahms. 2016. “Taking Making to School. A Model for Integrating Making into Classrooms.” In Makeology. Makerspaces as Learning Environments, edited by K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai, 97–106. Vol 1. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. L., G. G. Karp, H. Miao, and D. Perlman. 2008. “Physical Educators’ Technology Competencies and Usage.” Physical Educator: A Magazine for the Profession 65 (2): 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk Hoy, A., and H. A. Davis. 2006. “Teacher self-efficacy and Its Influence on the Achievement of Adolescents”. In SE Beliefs of Adolescents, edited by F. Pajares and T. Urdan, 1–45. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar