543
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mindful movements matter: differentiating active body movements in underprivileged students’ learning of physics concepts

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abrahamson, D. 2014. “Building Educational Activities for Understanding: An Elaboration on the Embodied-Design Framework and Its Epistemic Grounds.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 2 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.002.
  • Alibali, M. W., and A. A. DiRusso. 1999. “The Function of Gesture in Learning to Count: More than Keeping Track.” Cognitive Development 14 (1): 37–56. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80017-3.
  • Bäckman, L., L. Nilsson, and D. Chalom. 1986. “New Evidence on the Nature of the Encoding of Action Events.” Memory & Cognition 14 (4): 339–346. doi:10.3758/BF03202512.
  • Barak, M., and M. Assal. 2018. “Robotics and STEM Learning: Students’ Achievements in Assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—Practice, Problem Solving, and Projects.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28 (1): 121–144. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9.
  • Barker, B., and J. Ansorge. 2007. “Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39 (3): 229–243. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481.
  • Barsalou, L. W. 2003. “Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18 (5–6): 513–562. doi:10.1080/01690960344000026.
  • Barsalou, L. W. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59 (1): 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
  • Beilock, S. L., and L. E. Holt. 2007. “Embodied Preference Judgments: Can Likeability Be Driven by the Motor System?” Psychological Science 18 (1): 51–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01848.x.
  • Bers, M. U., L. Flannery, E. R. Kazakoff, and A. Sullivan. 2014. “Computational Thinking and Tinkering: Exploration of an Early Childhood Robotics Curriculum.” Computers & Education 72: 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020.
  • Black, J. B. 2008. “Imaginary Worlds.” In Memory and Mind: A Festschrift for Gordon H. Bower, edited by Mark A. Gluck, 195–208. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bonnet, M., J. Decety, M. Jeannerod, and J. Requin. 1997. “Mental Simulation of an Action Modulates the Excitability of Spinal Reflex Pathways in Man.” Cognitive Brain Research 5 (3): 221–228. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00072-9.
  • Branscombe, M. V. 2019. Teaching through Embodied Learning: Dramatizing Key Concepts from Informational Texts. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Braund, M. 2015. “Drama and Learning Science: An Empty Space?” British Educational Research Journal 41 (1): 102–121. doi:10.1002/berj.3130.
  • Chi, M. T. H., and R. Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4): 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
  • Cohen, R. L. 1981. “On the Generality of Some Memory Laws.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 22 (1): 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x.
  • Cohen, R. L. 1983. “The Effect of Encoding Variables on the Free Recall of Words and Action Events.” Memory & Cognition 11 (6): 575–582. doi:10.3758/BF03198282.
  • Cornelissen, J. P. 2006. “Making Sense of Theory Construction: Metaphor and Disciplined Imagination.” Organization Studies 27 (11): 1579–1597. doi:10.1177/0170840606068333.
  • Dorion, K. R. 2009. “Science through Drama: A Multiple Case Exploration of the Characteristics of Drama Activities Used in Secondary Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (16): 2247–2270. doi:10.1080/09500690802712699.
  • Druin, A., and J. Hendler. 2000. Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Engelkamp, J., and H. D. Zimmer. 1995. “Similarity of Movement in Recognition of Self-Performed Tasks and of Verbal Tasks.” British Journal of Psychology 86 (2): 241–252. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02559.x.
  • Engelkamp, J., and H. D. Zimmer. 1996. “Organization and Recall in Verbal Tasks and in Subject-Performed Tasks.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 8 (3): 257–263. doi:10.1080/095414496383086.
  • Gajdamaschko, N. 2005. “Vygotsky on Imagination: Why an Understanding of the Imagination Is an Important Issue for Schoolteachers.” Teaching Education 16 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1080/1047621052000341581.
  • Glenberg, A. M., and M. P. Kaschak. 2003. “The Body’s Contribution to Language.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, edited by Brian H. Ross, 93–126. New York: Academic Press.
  • Glenberg, A. M., T. Gutierrez, J. R. Levin, S. Japuntich, and M. P. Kaschak. 2004. “Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424.
  • Hagras, H., and T. M. Sobh. 2002. “Intelligent Learning and Control of Autonomous Robotic Agents Operating in Unstructured Environments.” Information Science 145 (1–2): 1–12. 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00221-9
  • Immordino-Yang, M. H. 2008. “The Smoke around Neurons: Goals as Sociocultural and Emotional Organizers of Perception and Action in Learning.” Mind, Brain, and Education 2 (2): 67–73. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00034.x.
  • Ingvar, D. H. 1979. ““Hyperfrontal” Distribution of the Cerebral Grey Matter Flow in Resting Wakefulness on the Functional Anatomy of the Conscious State.” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 60 (1): 12–25. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1979.tb02947.x
  • Jeannerod, M. 2001. “Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition.” NeuroImage 14 (1): S103–S109. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832.
  • Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., and C. Megowan-Romanowicz. 2017. “Embodied Science and Mixed Reality: How Gesture and Motion Capture Affect Physics Education.” Cognitive Research: Practices and Implications 2: 24. 10.1186/s41235-017-0060-9
  • Kang, S., G. L, L. K. Son Hallman, and J. B. Black. 2013. “The Different Benefits from Different Gestures in Understanding a Concept.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (6): 825–837. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9433-5.
  • Kaufman, J. 2010. The Personal MBA: Master the Art of Business. New York: Portfolio.
  • Kimmel, M. 2012. “Intersubjectivity at Close Quarters: How Dancers of Tango Argentino Use Imagery for Interaction and Improvisation.” Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 4 (1): 75–123.
  • Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirsh, D. 2011. “How Marking in Dance Constitutes Thinking with the Body.” Versus: 183–214. http://adrenaline.ucsd.edu/Kirsh/Articles/Marking_In_Dance/MarkingInDance.pdf
  • Koriat, A., and S. Pearlman-Avnion. 2003. “Memory Organization of Action Events and Its Relationship to Memory Performance.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 132 (3): 435–454. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.435.
  • Li, D., S. Kang, C. Lu, I. Han, and J. B. Black. 2009. “Case Studies of Developing Programming Skills via Embodied Experiences in an After-school LEGO Robotics Program for Elementary School Students.” Paper presented at Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Hawaii, June 22-26.
  • Littleton, K, and P. Light. 1999. Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interaction. London: Routledge.
  • Macedonia, M., and T. Knösche. 2011. “Body in Mind: How Gestures Empower Foreign Language Learning.” Mind, Brain, and Education 5 (4): 196–211. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01129.x.
  • Mauch, E. 2001. “Using Technological Innovation to Improve the Problem-Solving Skills of 8 Middle School Students.” The Clearing House 74 (4): 211–213. doi:10.1080/00098650109599193.
  • McGregor, D. 2012. “Dramatising Science Learning: Findings from a Pilot Study to Re-Invigorate Elementary Science Pedagogy for Five- to Seven-Year Olds.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (8): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.660751.
  • Mittelberg, I. 2018. “Gestures as Image Schemas and Force Gestalts: A Dynamic Systems Approach Augmented with Motion-Capture Data Analyses.” Cognitive Semiotics 11 (1): 394–405. doi:10.1515/cogsem-2018-0002.
  • Neathery, M. F. 1997. “Elementary and Secondary Students’ Perceptions toward Science: Correlations with Gender, Ethnicity, Ability, Grade, and Science Achievement.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 2. Accessed 12 December 2021. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443661.pdf
  • Noice, H, and T. Noice. 2001. “Learning Dialogue with and without Movement.” Memory & Cognition 29 (6): 820–827. doi:10.3758/BF03196411.
  • Novack, M., and S. Goldin-Meadow. 2015. “Learning from Gesture: How Our Hands Change Our Minds.” Educational Psychology Review 27 (3): 405–412. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9325-3.
  • Papert, S. 1980. “Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas.” New York: Basic Books.
  • Paulding, S. 2016. “Imagination through Knowledge.” In Knowledge through Imagination, edited by Amy Kind, 207–226. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Petre, M., and B. Price. 2004. “Using Robotics to Motivate “Back Door” Learning.” Education and Information Technologies 9 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60.
  • Schwartz, D. L., and J. B. Black. 1996. “Shuttling between Depictive Models and Abstract Rules: Induction and Fallback.” Cognitive Science 20 (4): 457–497. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1.
  • Schwartz, D. L., and T. Black. 1999. “Inferences through Imagined Actions: Knowing by Simulated Doing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (1): 116–136.
  • Shepard, R. N., and J. Metzler. 1971. “Mental Rotation of Three-dimensional Objects.” Science 171 (3972): 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
  • Shepard, R. N., and L. A. Cooper. 1986. Mental Images and Their Transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Slangen, L., H. V. Keulen, and K. Gravemeijer. 2011. “What Pupils Can Learn from Working with Robotic Direct Manipulation Environments.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (4): 449–469. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9130-8.
  • Stanfield, R A., and R A. Zwaan. 2001. “The Effect of Implied Orientation Derived from Verbal Context on Picture Recognition.” Psychological Science 12 (2): 153–56. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00326.
  • Szpunar, K K., R N. Spreng, and D L. Schacter. 2014. “A Taxonomy of Prospection: Introducing an Organizational Framework for Future-Oriented Cognition.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111: 18414–18421.
  • Taylor, S. E., and S. K. Schneider. 1989. “Coping and the Simulation of Events.” Social Cognition 7 (2): 174–194. doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.174.
  • Taylor, S. E., L. B. Pham, I. D. Rivkin, and D. A. Armor. 1998. “Harnessing the Imagination: Mental Simulation, Self-regulation, and Coping.” American Psychologist 53 (4): 429–439. 10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.429
  • Thomas Jha, R., S. Price, and A. Motion. 2020. “Designing ‘Embodied’ Science Learning Experiences for Young Children.” In HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12205, edited by P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_16
  • Zimmer, H. D., and J. Engelkamp. 1989. “Does Motor Encoding Enhance Relational Information?” Psychological Research 51 (4): 158–167. doi:10.1007/BF00309143.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.