464
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analysing teacher behaviour in synthesizing hands-on and minds-on during practical work

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, Fouad, Saouma Boujaoude, Richard Duschl, Norman G. Lederman, Rachel Mamlok‐Naaman, Avi Hofstein, Mansoor Niaz, David Treagust, and Hsiao‐lin Tuan. 2004. “Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives.” Science Education 88 (3): 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118.
  • Abrahams, Ian. 2005. Between Rhetoric and Reality: The Use and Effectiveness of Practical Work in Secondary School Science. York: University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/14069.
  • Abrahams, Ian, and Robin Millar. 2008. “Does Practical Work Really Work? A Study of the Effectiveness of Practical Work as a Teaching and Learning Method in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (14): 1945–1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305.
  • Abrahams, Ian, and Michael J. Reiss. 2012. “Practical Work: Its Effectiveness in Primary and Secondary Schools in England.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (8): 1035–1055. doi:10.1002/tea.21036.
  • Akuma, Fru Vitalis, and Ronel Callaghan. 2019. “A Systematic Review Characterizing and Clarifying Intrinsic Teaching Challenges Linked to Inquiry‐based Practical Work.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (5): 619–648. doi:10.1002/tea.21516.
  • Alfieri, Louis, Patricia J. Brooks, Naomi J. Aldrich, and Harriet R. Tenenbaum. 2011. “Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1): 1. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0021017.
  • Bailin, Sharon. 2002. “Critical Thinking and Science Education.” Science & Education 11 (4): 361–375. doi:10.1023/A:1016042608621.
  • Catherine, Crouch, P. Fagen Adam, J. Paul Callan, and Eric Mazur. 2004. “Classroom Demonstrations: Learning Tools or Entertainment?” American Journal of Physics 72 (6): 835–838. doi:10.1119/1.1707018.
  • Chinn, Clark A., and William F. Brewer. 1993. “The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction.” Review of Educational Research 63 (1): 1–49. doi:10.3102/00346543063001001.
  • Chinn, Clark A., and Betina A. Malhotra. 2002. “Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks.” Science Education 86 (2): 175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001.
  • Dekkers, Petrus. 1997. “Making Productive Use of Student Conceptions in Physics Education: Developing the Concept of Force through Practical Work.” PhD diss, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
  • Di Fuccia, David, Torsten Witteck, Silvija Markic, and Ingo Eilks. 2012. “Trends in Practical Work in German Science Education.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (1): 59–72. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2012.817a.
  • Dunbar, Kevin, and Jonathan Fugelsang. 2005. “Scientific Thinking and Reasoning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 705–725 .
  • Etkina, Eugenia, Alan Van Heuvelen, Suzanne White-Brahmia, David T. Brookes, Michael Gentile, Sahana Murthy, David Rosengrant, and Aaron Warren. 2006. “Scientific Abilities and Their Assessment.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 2 (2): 020103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020103.
  • Etkina, Eugenia, Anna Karelina, Maria Ruibal-Villasenor, David Rosengrant, Rebecca Jordan, and Cindy Hmelo-Silver. 2010. “Design and Reflection Help Students Develop Scientific Abilities: Learning in Introductory Physics Laboratories.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (1): 54–98. doi:10.1080/10508400903452876.
  • Gunstone, Richard F. 1990 Reconstructing theory from practical experience Woolnough, B. ed. Practical Science (Milton Keynes: Open University Press) 67–77.
  • Hager, Paul, Ray Sleet, Peter Logan, and Mal Hooper. 2003. “Teaching Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Science Courses.” Science & Education 12 (3): 303–313. doi:10.1023/A:1024043708461.
  • Harrison, Mark. 2016. “Making Practical Work Work: Using Discussion to Enhance Pupils’ Understanding of Physics.” Research in Science & Technological Education 34 (3): 290–306. doi:10.1080/02635143.2016.1173668.
  • Hart, Christina, Pamela Mulhall, Amanda Berry, John Loughran, and Richard Gunstone. 2000. “What Is the Purpose of This Experiment? Or Can Students Learn Something from Doing Experiments?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (7): 655–675. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<655::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E.
  • Hodson, Derek. 1993. “Re-Thinking Old Ways: Towards a More Critical Approach to Practical Work in School Science.” Studies in Science Education 22 (1): 85–142. doi:10.1080/03057269308560022.
  • Hodson, Derek. 2014. “Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different Goals Demand Different Learning Methods.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (15): 2534–2553. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.899722.
  • Hofstein, Avi, and Vincent N. Lunetta. 1982. “The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.” Review of Educational Research 52 (2): 201–217. doi:10.3102/00346543052002201.
  • Hofstein, Avi, and Vincent N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐first Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106.
  • Hofstein, Avi, and Per M. Kind. 2012. “Learning in and from Science Laboratories.” Second International Handbook of Science Education 189–207. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15.
  • Ian, Abrahams, Michael J. Reiss, and Rachael Sharpe. 2014. “The Impact of the ‘Getting Practical: Improving Practical Work in Science’continuing Professional Development Programme on Teachers’ Ideas and Practice in Science Practical Work.” Research in Science & Technological Education 32 (3): 263–280. doi:10.1080/02635143.2014.931841.
  • Karelina, Anna, and Eugenia Etkina. 2007. “Acting like a Physicist: Student Approach Study to Experimental Design.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 3 (2): 020106. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106.
  • Keogh, Brenda, and Stuart Naylor. 1999. “Concept Cartoons, Teaching and Learning in Science: An Evaluation.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (4): 431–446. doi:10.1080/095006999290642.
  • Klahr, David, and Kevin Dunbar. 1988. “Dual Space Search during Scientific Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 1–48. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1.
  • Loi, Booher, Louis S. Nadelson, and Sandra G. Nadelson. 2020. “What about Research and Evidence? Teachers’ Perceptions and Uses of Education Research to Inform STEM Teaching.” The Journal of Educational Research 113 (3): 213–225. doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1782811.
  • Lunetta, Vincent N., Avi Hofstein, and Michael P. Clough. 2007. “Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice.” Handbook of Research on Science Education 2: 393–441.
  • Millar, Robin. 2009. “.” In Analysing Practical Activities to Assess and Improve Effectiveness: The Practical Activity Analysis Inventory (PAAI). York: Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education, University of York.
  • Millar, Robin. 2010. “Practical Work.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say 2nd , edited by Jonathan Osborne and Justin Dillon. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education (UK). 108–134 .
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Osborne, Jonathan. 2015. “Practical Work in Science: Misunderstood and Badly Used?” School Science Review 96 (357): 16–24.
  • Pedaste, Margus, Mario Mäeots, Leo A. Siiman, Ton De Jong, Siswa AN Van Riesen, Ellen T. Kamp, Constantinos C. Manoli, Zacharias C. Zacharia, and Eleftheria Tsourlidaki. 2015. “Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle.” Educational Research Review 14: 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
  • Pols, Freek, Peter Dekkers, and Marc de Vries. 2019. “Introducing Argumentation in Inquiry: A Combination of Five Exemplary Activities.” Physics Education 54 (5): 055014. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab2ae5.
  • Ratcliffe, Mary, Hannah Bartholomew, Vicky Hames, Andy Hind, John Leach, Robin Millar, and Jonathan Osborne. 2005. “Evidence‐based Practice in Science Education: The Researcher–user Interface.” Research Papers in Education 20 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1080/02671520500078036.
  • Reiss, Michael J. 2018. “Beyond 2020: Ten Questions for Science Education.” School Science Review 100 (370): 47–52.
  • Sinclair, Anne. 1994. “Prediction Making as an Instructional Strategy: Implications of Teacher Effects on Learning, Attitude toward Science, and Classroom Participation.” Journal of Research & Development in Education 27 (3): 153–161.
  • Tamir, Pinchas, and V N. Lunetta. 1981. “Inquiry-Related Tasks in High School Science Laboratory Handbooks.” Science Education 65 (5): 477–484. doi:10.1002/sce.3730650503.
  • van den Berg, Ed. 2013. “The PCK of Laboratory Teaching: Turning Manipulation of Equipment into Manipulation of Ideas.” Scientia in Educatione 4 (2): 74–92.
  • Vieira, Rui Marques, Celina Tenreiro-Vieira, and Isabel P. Martins. 2011. “Critical Thinking: Conceptual Clarification and Its Importance in Science Education.” Science Education International 22 (1): 43–54.
  • Watson, J. R., J. R. L. Swain, and C. McRobbie. 2004. “Students’ Discussions in Practical Scientific Inquiries.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072764.
  • Wieman, Carl. 2015. “Comparative Cognitive Task Analyses of Experimental Science and Instructional Laboratory Courses.” The Physics Teacher 53 (6): 349–351. doi:10.1119/1.4928349.
  • Zimmerman, Corinne, and Steve Croker. 2014. “A Prospective Cognition Analysis of Scientific Thinking and the Implications for Teaching and Learning Science.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 13 (2): 245–257. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.13.2.245.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.