Building and programming a weather station: Teachers’ views on values and challenges in a comprehensive STEM project

References

• Anderson, Judy, and Li. Yeping. 2020. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Barnacle, Robyn. 2004. “Reflection on Lived Experience in Educational Research.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00048.x.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, B., and A. Sanne. 2021. “Conditions for the Active Involvement of Teachers in a Design-Based Research Project.” Designs for Learning 13 (1): 44–54. doi:10.16993/dfl.169.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. 2014. “From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by N. G. Lederman and S. K. Abell, 515–541. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dare, E A., J A. Ellis, and G H. Roehrig. 2018. “Understanding Science Teachers’ Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units through a Phenomenological Multiple Case Study.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoito, Isha, and Philip Myszkal. 2018. “Connecting Science Instruction and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Beliefs in STEM Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 29 (6): 485–503. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2018.1473748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Szu-Chun, Yu Kuang-Chao, and Kuen-Yi Lin. 2020. “A Framework for Implementing an engineering-focused STEM Curriculum.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, Shuchi, and Roy Pea. 2013. “Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field.” Educational Researcher 42 (1): 38–43. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, Eden, and Julie Mueller. 2020. “Teaching and Learning Design Thinking (DT): How Do Educators See DT Fitting into the Classroom?” Canadian Journal of Education 43 (2): 499–521. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/4033.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C., M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, and L. D. English. 2020. Handbook of Research on STEM Education 1ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Okhee, Helen Quinn, and Guadalupe Valdés. 2013. “Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.” Educational Researcher 42 (4): 223–233. doi:10.3102/0013189X13480524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., A H. Schoenfeld, A A. diSessa, A C. Graesser, L C. Benson, L D. English, and R A. Duschl. 2020. “On Computational Thinking and STEM Education.” Journal for STEM Education Research 3 (2): 147–166. doi:10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w.
   Google Scholar
• Margot, K C., and Todd Kettler. 2019. “Teachers’ Perception of STEM Integration and Education: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W F., and S R. Burgin. 2020. “A Critique of “STEM” Education.” Science & Education 29 (4): 805–829. doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00138-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDET. 2020. Curricula in English. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. https://www.udir.no/in-english/curricula-in-english/. 31 October 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Reynante, B M., M E. Selbach-Allen, and D R. Pimentel. 2020. “Exploring the Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM through Disciplinary Practices and Epistemologies.” Science & Education 29 (4): 785–803. doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00121-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, Jonathan. 2012. “Moving beyond Subject Boundaries: Four Case Studies of cross-curricular Pedagogy in Secondary Schools.” International Journal of Educational Research 55: 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Simarro, Cristina, and Digna Couso. 2021. “Engineering Practices as a Framework for STEM Education: A Proposal Based on Epistemic Nuances.” International Journal of STEM Education 8 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00310-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyack, D, and W Tobin. 1994. “The “Grammar” of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change?” American Educational Research Journal 31 (3): 453. doi:10.3102/00028312031003453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, Russell. 2020. “STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century.” In Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. An International Perspective, edited by Judy Anderson and Yeping Li, 21–43, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, Max. 2016. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnervik, Peter. 2020. “Implementing Programming in School Mathematics and Technology: Teachers’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Challenges.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1–30. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09602-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Hui-Hui, Tamara J Moore, Gillian H Roehrig, and Mi Sun Park. 2011. “STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 1 (2): 2. doi:10.5703/1288284314636.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, David, Elham Beheshti, Michael Horn, Kai Orton, Kemi Jona, Laura Trouille, and Uri Wilensky. 2016. “Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (1): 127–147. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbroek, Hanna, Fred Janssen, and Walter Doyle. 2017. “Perfectly Reasonable in a Practical World: Understanding Chemistry Teacher Responses to a Change Proposal.” Research in Science Education 47 (6): 1403–1423. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9560-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Daniel, and Seamus Delaney. 2021. “Full STEAM Ahead, but Who Has the Map for Integration? - A PRISMA Systematic Review on the Incorporation of Interdisciplinary Learning into Schools.” LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education 9 (2): 9–32. doi:10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1387.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S M. 2021. “Realizing STEM’s Potential and Promise.” Journal for STEM Education Research 4 (2): 240–245. doi:10.1007/s41979-021-00056-0.
   Google Scholar
• Yeping, Li, Ke Wang, Yu Xiao, and Jeffrey E Froyd. 2020. “Research and Trends in STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Journal Publications.” International Journal of STEM Education 7 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar