Students’ perceptions of authenticity in an upper secondary technology education innovation project

References

• Alias, Maizam, Alias Masek, and Hasanul Hadi Md Salleh. 2015. “Self, Peer and Teacher Assessments in Problem Based Learning: Are They in Agreements?” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 204: 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.157.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. Elaine, and Christopher A Seaman. 2007. “Likert Scales and Data Analyses.” Quality Progress 40 (7): 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Anker-Hansen, Jens, and Maria Andreé. 2019. “In Pursuit of Authenticity in Science Education.” NorDiNa, Nordic Studies in Science Education 15 (1): 498–510. doi:10.5617/nordina.4723.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, Ossi 2019. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Technology Education.” The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, Antalya, Turkey 15: 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, Moshe. 2020. “Problem-, Project- and Design-Based Learning: Their Relationship to Teaching Science, Technology and Engineering in School.” Journal of Problem-Based Learning 7 (2): 94–97. doi:10.24313/jpbl.2020.00227.
   Google Scholar
• Battelle For Kids. “Partnership for 21st Century Learning”. n d. http://www.p21.org/
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, Nadia 2011. “Authenticity as a Motivational Variable in Academic Writing.” Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Georgia Educational Research Association (GERA), Savannah, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Behizadeh, Nadia, and George Engelhard. 2014. “Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Perceived Authenticity in Writing.” Assessing Writing 21: 18–36. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozalek, Vivienne, Daniela Gachago, Lucy Alexander, Kathy Watters, Denise Wood, Eunice Ivala, and Jan Herrington. 2013. “The Use of Emerging Technologies for Authentic Learning: A South African Study in Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (4): 629–638. doi:10.1111/bjet.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, Martin, and Michael Reiss. 2006. “Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The Contribution of Out‐of‐school Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1373–1388. doi:10.1080/09500690500498419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachia, Romina, Anusca Ferrari, Kirsti Ala-Mutka, and Yves Punie. 2010. Final Report on the Study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in the EU Member States. Louxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Simon. 2007. “Assessing ‘Inexperienced’ Students’ Ability to self-assess: Exploring Links with Learning Style and Academic Personal Control.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32: 313–330. doi:10.1080/02602930600896704.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Juebei, Anette Kolmos, and DU Xiangyun. 2020. “Forms of Implementation and Challenges of PBL in Engineering Education: A Review of Literature.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (1): 90–115. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chris, Dede, Korte Spence, Robert Nelson, Gil Valdez, and David J. Ward. 2005. Transforming learning for the 21st century: An economic imperative. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2MUfV32
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7 ed. Oxon: Routhledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, David, and Elizabeth French. 2014. “Student Ownership of Learning as a Key Component of College Readiness.” American Behavioural Scientist 58 (8): 1018–1034. doi:10.1177/0002764213515232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1900. School and Society. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago press. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/53910/53910-h/53910-h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Edström, Kristina, and Anette Kolmos. 2014. “PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (5): 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703.
   Google Scholar
• EU (Council of the European Union). 2008. “Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, Meeting within the Council of 21 November 2008 on Preparing Young People for the 21st Century: An Agenda for European Cooperation on Schools.” Official Journal of the European Union C: 319/21.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4 ed. London: Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Garland, Ron. 1991. “The mid-point on a Rating Scale: Is It Desirable.” Marketing Bulletin 2 (1): 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Graham. 2007. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Gulikers, Judith TM, Theo J. Bastiaens, and Rob L. Martens. 2005. “The Surplus Value of an Authentic Learning Environment.” Computers in Human Behavior 21 (3): 509–521. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Peter 2006. “How Should Colleges Prepare Students to Succeed in Today’s Global Economy?” http://www.aacu.org/advocacy/leap/documents/Re8097abcombined.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, Jan n d. “Authentic Learning” http://authenticlearning.info/AuthenticLearning/Home.html
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, Jan, and Ron Oliver. 2000. “An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48 (3): 23–48. doi:10.1007/BF02319856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Ann Marie. 2018. “Authentic Learning and Technology Education.” In Handbook of Technology Education, edited by de Vries and de Vries. Cham, Switzerland: Springer 473–487 . doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_36.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Ann Marie, and Howard A. Smith. 1998. “Practice Meets Theory in Technological Education: A Case of Authentic Learning in the High School Setting.” Journal of Technology Education 9 (1): 29–41. doi:10.21061/jte.v9i2.a.3.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Ann Marie, and Howard A. Smith. 2005. “Research in Purpose and Value for the Study of Technology in Secondary Schools: A Theory of Authentic Learning.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1007/s10798-004-6195-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan, Herrington, Thomas C. Reeves, and Ron Oliver. 2010. A Guide to Authentic e-learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnmarshall, Reeve, Steven G. Cole, and Bradley C. Olson. 1986. “Adding Excitement to Intrinsic Motivation Research.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1 (3): 349.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James. 2019. “Self-assessments of Creativity: Not Ideal, but Better than You Think.” Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 13 (2): 187–192. doi:10.1037/aca0000217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James, and Ronald Beghetto. 2009. ““Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity”. Review of General Psychology 13 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, Linda Costigan. 1990. “Assessing Educational Effectiveness: The Focus Group Interview as a Technique for Data Collection.” Communication Education 39 (2): 117–127. doi:10.1080/03634529009378794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Rees, G Daniel, Jamie Gorson, Leesha V. Maliakal, Spencer E. Carlson, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Christopher K. Riesbeck, and Matthew W. Easterday. 2018. “Planning to Iterate: Supporting Iterative Practices for Real-world Ill-structured Problem-solving.” Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count 1: 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, R. M., P.H. Andersson, and E. Saalman. 2017. “Active Learning in Engineering Education: A (Re) Introduction.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1254161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdeleine, Lew, W.A.M. Alwis, and Henk Schmidt. 2010. “Accuracy of Students’ self-assessment and Their Beliefs about Its Utility.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (2): 135–156. doi:10.1080/02602930802687737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matell, Michael S., and Jacob Jacoby. 1972. “Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Effects of Testing Time and Scale Properties.” Journal of Applied Psychology 56 (6): 506–509. doi:10.1037/h0033601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Patricia, Stephen Lunn, and Helen Jones. 2006. “The Impact of Authentic Learning on Students’ Engagement with Physics.” The Curriculum Journal 17 (3): 229–246. doi:10.1080/09585170600909688.
   Google Scholar
• Nicaise, Molly, Terresa Gibney, and Michael Crane. 2000. “Toward an Understanding of Authentic Learning: Student Perceptions of an Authentic Classroom.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 9 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1023/A:1009477008671.
   Google Scholar
• Puente, Gómez, Sonia Maria, Michael van Eijck, and Wim Jochems. 2011. “Towards Characterising design-based Learning in Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1080/03043797.2011.565116.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell‐Gates, Victoria, Sophie C. Degener, Erik Jacobson, and Marta Soler. 2002. “Impact of Authentic Adult Literacy Instruction on Adult Literacy Practices.” Reading Research Quarterly 37 (1): 70–92. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees Lewis, D. G., C. K. Riesbeck, E. M. Gerber, and M. W. Easterday. 2019. Assessing Iterative Planning in Learning Environments for Real-World Design. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Lyon: France.
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, Andrew J., and Daniel Willingham. 2010. “‘21st-Century’ Skills. Not New, but a Worthy Challenge.” American Educator 34 (1): 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard, and Edward Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definition and New Directions”. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, David Williamson, and Mitchel Resnick. 1999. ““Thick” Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10 (2): 195–216.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, Dean Keith. 2017. “Big-C versus Little-c Creativity: Definitions, Implications, and Inherent Educational Contradictions.” R. Beghetto and B. Sriraman edited by Creative Contradictions in Education. Creativity Theory and Action in Education. Vol 1: 3-19. Springer : Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_1.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011. “Subject Plans in Upper Secondary School in English.” https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.4fc05a3f164131a7418107e/1535372300598/Technology-swedish-school.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Svärd, Joachim, Konrad Schönborn and Jonas Hallström. 2017a. ”Design of an authentic innovation project in Swedish upper secondary technology education”. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 4:1-15. https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v4i1.48
   Google Scholar
• Svärd, Joachim, Konrad Schönborn and Jonas Hallström. 2017b. ”Does Authentic Learning Work? Evaluating an Innovation Project in Upper Secondary Technology Education in Sweden.” PATT-34 Proceedings: Technology & Engineering Education. Fostering the Creativity of Youth Around the Globe. Philadelphia: Millersville University.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good Research Practice Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie, VR1710. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Teknikdelegationen. 2010. “Vändpunkt Sverige – Ett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT.” In [Turning Point Sweden - an Increased Interest in Mathematics, Science, Technology and ICT.] SOU, 28. Stockholm: Teknikdelegationen.
   Google Scholar
• Tsybulsky, Dina. 2019. “Students Meet Authentic Science: The Valence and Foci of Experiences Reported by high-school Biology Students regarding Their Participation in a Science Outreach Programme.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (5): 567–585. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1570380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, Wendy. 2002. “The Place of Authenticity in Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12 (1): 23–40. doi:10.1023/A:1013056129283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria, Purcell-Gates, Nell K. Duke, and Joseph A. Martineau. 2007. “Learning to Read and Write Genre- Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (1): 8–45. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, Victoria. 2010. Fokusgrupper. 2 ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur. [Focus groups].
   Google Scholar