337
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Students creating videos for learning by teaching from their scientific curiosity

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bargh, J., and Y. Schul. 1980. “On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching.” Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (5): 593–604. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593.
  • Bawden, D., and L. Robinson. 2009. “The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies.” Journal of Information Science 35 (2): 180–191. doi:10.1177/0165551508095781.
  • Bennett, J., S. Hogarth, F. Lubben, B. Campbell, and A. Robinson. 2010. “Talking Science: The Research Evidence on the Use of Small Group Discussions in Science Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (1): 69–95. doi:10.1080/09500690802713507.
  • Benware, C., and E. Deci. 1984. “Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set.” American Educational Research Journal 21 (4): 755–765. doi:10.3102/00028312021004755.
  • Bloom, B. S., M. D. Englehart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. New York: David Mckay.
  • Branch, J. L. 2000. “Investigating the Information-Seeking Processes of Adolescents: The Value of Using Think Alouds and Think Afters.” Library and Information Science Research 22 (4): 371–392. doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(00)00051-7.
  • Chang, T-L., and H-T. Hsin. 2021. “The Effect of the Self-explain–Discuss–Re-explain (SDR) Learning Strategy on High- and Low-Achieving Fifth-Grade Students’ Achievement in Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 39 (4): 461–488. doi:10.1080/02635143.2020.1772223.
  • Coiro, J. 2011. “Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of Offline Reading Skills, Online Reading Skills, and Prior Knowledge.” Journal of Literacy Research 43 (4): 352–392. doi:10.1177/1086296X11421979.
  • Coiro, J., and E. Dobler. 2007. “Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (2): 214–257. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2.
  • Coll, C., and J. L. Rodríguez. 2008. “Alfabetización, nuevas alfabetizaciones y alfabetización digital: Las TIC en el currículum escolar.” In [Literacy, New Literacies and Digital Literacy: ICT in the School Curriculum.] In Psicología de la Educación Virtual [Psychology of Virtual Education], edited by C. Coll and C. Monereo, 325–347. Madrid: Morata.
  • Colley, C., and M. Windschitl. 2016. “Rigor in Elementary Science Students’ Discourse: The Role of Responsiveness and Supportive Conditions for Talk.” Science Education 100 (6): 1009–1038. doi:10.1002/sce.21243.
  • Downie, J., J. A. Morton, and M. R. McCoustra. 2017. “Bright Lights: Big Experiments! A Public Engagement Activity for International Year of Light.” Physics Education 52 (1). Article 015005.
  • Duran, D. 2017. “Learning-by-Teaching: Evidence and Implications as a Pedagogical Mechanism.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (5): 476–484. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011.
  • Duran, D., M. Flores, and E. Miquel. 2019. “The Teacher’s Role during Cooperative Learning: Should I Leave the Classroom When Students are Independently Working in Teams?” Journal of Classroom Interaction 54 (2): 24–40.
  • Duran, D., and K. J. Topping. 2017. Learning by Teaching: Evidence-Based Strategies to Enhance Learning in the Classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Eymur, G., and Ö. Geban. 2017. “The Collaboration of Cooperative Learning and Conceptual Change: Enhancing the Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding Concepts.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (5): 853–871. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9716-z.
  • Farrokhnia, M., R. F. Meulenbroeks, and W. R. van Joolingen. 2020. “Student-Generated Stop-Motion Animation in Science Classes: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 29: 797–812. doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1.
  • Fernández-Enguita, M. 2017. Más escuela y menos aula [More School and Less Classroom]. Madrid: Morata.
  • Fiorella, L., and R. E. Mayer. 2013. “The Relative Benefits of Learning by Teaching and Teaching Expectancy.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 38 (4): 281–288. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001.
  • Fiorella, L., and R. E. Mayer. 2014. “Role of Expectations and Explanations in Learning by Teaching.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 39 (2): 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.01.001.
  • Freire, P., and A. Faundez. 1989. Learning to Question: A Pedagogy of Liberation. Geneva: WCC Publications.
  • Furberg, A., and H. C. Arnseth. 2009. “Reconsidering Conceptual Change from a Socio-Cultural Perspective: Analyzing Students’ Meaning Making in Genetics in Collaborative Learning Activities.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 4 (1): 157–191. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9161-6.
  • Gallardo-Williams, M., L. A. Morsch, C. Paye, and M. K. Seery. 2020. “Student-Generated Video in Chemistry Education.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21: 488–495. doi:10.1039/C9RP00182D.
  • Goldman, S. R., J. L. Braasch, J. Wiley, A. C. Graesser, and K. Brodowinska. 2012. “Comprehending and Learning from Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (4): 356–381. doi:10.1002/RRQ.027.
  • Hoogerheide, V., J. Visee, A. Lachner, and T. van Gog. 2019. “Generating an Instructional Video as Homework Activity Is Both Effective and Enjoyable.” Learning and Instruction 64: 101226. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101226.
  • Hsu, C. C., and T. I. Wang. 2018. “Applying Game Mechanics and Student-Generated Questions to an Online Puzzle-Based Game Learning System to Promote Algorithmic Thinking Skills.” Computers and Education 121: 73–88. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.002.
  • Hubbard, B. A., Jones, G. C., and Gallardo-Williams, M. T. 2019. ”Student-Generated Digital Tutorials in an Introductory Organic Chemistry Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 96 (3): 597–600. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00457
  • Ilomäki, L., S. Paavola, M. Lakkala, and A. Kantosalo. 2016. “Digital Competence: An Emergent Boundary Concept for Policy and Educational Research.” Education and Information Technologies 21 (3): 655–679. doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4.
  • Isohätälä, J., H. Järvenoja, and S. Järvelä. 2017. “Socially Shared Regulation of Learning and Participation in Social Interaction in Collaborative Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 81: 11–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.006.
  • Jablonski, D., G. F. Hoban, H. S. Ransom, and K. S. Ward. 2015. “Exploring the Use of “Slowmation” as a Pedagogical Alternative in Science Teaching and Learning.” Pacific-Asian Education 27 (1): 5–20.
  • Järvelä, S. 2001. “Shifting Research on Motivation and Cognition to an Integrated Approach on Learning and Motivation in Context.” In Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, edited by S. Volet and S. Järvelä, 3–14. London: Pergamon/Elsevier.
  • Järvelä, S., H. Järvenoja, J. Malmberg, and A. Hadwin. 2013. “Exploring Socially-Shared Regulation in the Context of Collaboration.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 12 (3): 267–286. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267.
  • Kerssen Griep, J., J. A. Hess, and A. R. Trees. 2003. “Sustaining the Desire to Learn: Dimensions of Perceived Instructional Facework Related to Student Involvement and Motivation to Learn.” Western Journal of Communication 67 (4): 357–381. doi:10.1080/10570310309374779.
  • Knight, S., and N. Mercer. 2015. “The Role of Exploratory Talk in Classroom Search Engine Tasks.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24 (3): 303–319. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2014.931884.
  • Kobayashi, K. 2019. “Learning by Preparing-to-Teach and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis.” Japanese Psychological Research 61: 192–203. doi:10.1111/jpr.12221.
  • Kraft, M. A. 2020. “Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions.” Educational Researcher 49 (4): 241–253. doi:10.3102/0013189X20912798.
  • Lachner, A., V. Hoogerheide, T. van Gog, and A. Renkl. 2021. “Learning-by-Teaching without Audience Presence or Interaction: When and Why Does It Work?” Educational Psychology Review Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09643-4.
  • Lemke, J. L. 2002. “Enseñar todos los lenguajes de la ciencia: Palabras, símbolos, imágenes y acciones.” [Teaching All the Languages of Science: Words, Symbols, Images, and Actions.] In La educación en ciencias: Ideas para mejorar su práctica.”M. Benlloch edited by [Education in Science: Ideas for Improving Its Practice]. Barcelona:Paidós.Available in English at 159–186. doi:10.13140/2.1.4022.5608.
  • Lin, T. J., T. C. Lin, P. Potvin, and C. C. Tsai. 2019. “Research Trends in Science Education from 2013 to 2017: A Systematic Content Analysis of Publications in Selected Journals.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (3): 367–387. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274.
  • Lin, S. W., Y. Liu, S. F. Chen, J. R. Wang, and H. L. Kao. 2016. “Elementary School Students’ Science Talk Ability in Inquiry-Oriented Settings in Taiwan: Test Development, Verification, and Performance Benchmarks.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (7): 1199–1214. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9663-0.
  • Lin, J. W., M. H. Yen, J. Liang, M. H. Chiu, and C. J. Guo. 2016. “Examining the Factors that Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12 (9): 2617–2646. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a.
  • Loyens, S. M., J. Magda, and R. M. Rikers. 2008. “Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and Its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 20 (4): 411–427. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7.
  • Macedo-Rouet, M., J. L. Braasch, M. A. Britt, and J. F. Rouet. 2013. “Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources during Text Comprehension.” Cognition and Instruction 31 (2): 204–226. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769995.
  • McGahan, W. T., Ernst, H., and Dyson, L. E. 2016. ”Individual Learning Strategies and Choice in Student-Generated Multimedia.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 8 (3): 1–18. doi:10.4018/IJMBL.2016070101
  • Mills, R., L. Tomas, and B. Lewthwaite. 2019. “The Impact of Student-Constructed Animation on Middle School Students’ Learning about Plate Tectonics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 28 (2): 165–177. doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9755-z.
  • Monereo, C. ed. 2005. Internet y competencias básicas: Aprender a colaborar, a comunicarse, a participar, a aprender. Barcelona: Graó. [Internet and Core Competences: Learning to Collaborate, Communicate, Participate, Learn].
  • Muis, K. R., C. Psaradellis, M. Chevrier, I. Di Leo, and S. P. Lajoie. 2016. “Learning by Preparing to Teach: Fostering Self-Regulatory Processes and Achievement during Complex Mathematics Problem Solving.” Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (4): 474–492. doi:10.1037/edu0000071.
  • Nestojko, J. F., D. C. Bui, and N. Kornell. 2014. “Expecting to Teach Enhances Learning and Organization of Knowledge in Free Recall of Text Passages.” Memory and Cognition 42 (7): 1038–1048. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0416-z.
  • Nielsen, W., Georgiou, H., Jones, P., and Turney, A. 2020. ”Digital Explanation as Assessment in University Science.” Research in Science Education 50: 2391–2418. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9785-9
  • Ødegaard, M., N. E. Arnesen, and K. Klette. 2016. “Talk and Use of Language in the Science Classroom: Characteristic Features.” In Teaching and Learning in Lower Secondary Schools in the Era of PISA and TIMSS, edited by K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, and A. Roe, 101–112. Cham: Springer.
  • OECD. 2017. “How Does PISA for Development Measure Scientific Literacy? PISA for Development Brief 2017/2.” OECD Publishing, February. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/10-How-PISA-D-measures-science-literacy.pdf
  • Panadero, E., and S. Järvelä. 2015. “Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review.” European Psychologist 20 (3): 190–203. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000226.
  • Penttilä, J., V. Kallunki, H. M. Niemi, and J. Multisilta. 2016. “A Structured Inquiry into A Digital Story: Students Report the Making of A Superball.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 8 (3): 19–34. doi:10.4018/ijmbl.2016070102.
  • Pérez-Echeverría, M., E. Martí, and J. I. Pozo. 2010. “External Representation Systems as Tools of the Mind.” Culture and Education 22 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1174/113564010791304519.
  • Pintrich, P. 1999. “The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 459–470. doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4.
  • Reyna, J., and P. Meier. 2018. “Learner-Generated Digital Media (LGDM) as an Assessment Tool in Tertiary Science Education: A Review of Literature.” IAFOR Journal of Education 6 (3): 93–109. doi:10.22492/ije.6.3.06.
  • Ribosa, J., and D. Duran. 2021. “Cuando la Curiosidad Científica se Transforma en un Videotutorial para Aprender Enseñando: Conocimiento del Contenido, Elaboración de las Explicaciones y Complejidad de las Preguntas.” Revista Iberoamericana de Educación 87 (2): 85–101. doi:10.35362/rie8724572.
  • Ribosa, J., and D. Duran. 2022. “Student-Generated Teaching Materials: A Scoping Review Mapping the Research Field.” Education in the Knowledge Society 23: 27443. doi:10.14201/eks.27443.
  • Siko, J. P. 2013. “Are They Climbing the Pyramid? Rating Student-Generated Questions in a Game Design Project.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 39 (1): 1–14. doi:10.21432/t26k5m.
  • Sinatra, G. M., and B. K. Hofer. 2016. “Public Understanding of Science: Policy and Educational Implications.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2): 245–253. doi:10.1177/2372732216656870.
  • Sinatra, G. M., and D. Lombardi. 2020. “Evaluating Sources of Scientific Evidence and Claims in the Posttruth Era May Require Reappraising Plausibility Judgments.” Educational Psychologist 55 (3): 120–131. doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1730181.
  • Snelson, C. 2018. “Video Production in Content-Area Pedagogy: A Scoping Study of the Research Literature.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (3): 294–306. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1504788.
  • Thurston, A., K. J. Topping, A. Tolmie, D. Christie, E. Karagiannidou, and P. Murray. 2010. “Cooperative Learning in Science: Follow‐Up from Primary to High School.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (4): 501–522. doi:10.1080/09500690902721673.
  • Topping, K. J. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.
  • Topping, K. J., C. Buchs, D. Duran, and H. Van Keer. 2017. Effective Peer Learning: From Principles to Practical Implementation. London: Routledge.
  • Topping, K. J., A. Thurston, A. Tolmie, D. Christie, P. Murray, and E. Karagiannidou. 2011. ““Cooperative Learning in Science: Intervention in the Secondary School”. Research in Science & Technological Education 29 (1): 91–106. doi:10.1080/02635143.2010.539972.
  • United Nations. 2016. “Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education: Lifelong Learning.” Retrieved from https://www.right-to-education.org/resource/report-un-special-rapporteur-right-education-lifelong-learning
  • Warfa, A. R. M., J. Nyachwaya, and G. Roehrig. 2018. “The Influences of Group Dialog on Individual Student Understanding of Science Concepts.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0142-3.
  • Webb, M., and M. Cox. 2004. “A Review of Pedagogy Related to Information and Communications Technology.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13 (3): 235–286. doi:10.1080/14759390400200183.
  • Yeung, K. L., S. K. Carpenter, and D. Corral. 2021. “A Comprehensive Review of Educational Technology on Objective Learning Outcomes in Academic Contexts.” Educational Psychology Review 33: 1583–1630. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09592-4.
  • Zacharia, Z. C., N. A. Xenofontos, and C. C. Manoli. 2011. “The Effect of Two Different Cooperative Approaches on Students’ Learning and Practices within the Context of a Webquest Science Investigation.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (3): 399–424. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9181-2.
  • Zhang, M., and C. Quintana. 2012. “Scaffolding Strategies for Supporting Middle School Students’ Online Inquiry Processes.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 181–196. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010.
  • Zhu, Z., D. Bernhard, and I. Gurevych 2009. “A Multi-Dimensional Model for Assessing the Quality of Answers in Social Q&A Sites (Report Number TUD-CS-2009-0158).” Technische Universität Darmstadt. Retrieved from https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/1940/1/TR_dimension_model.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.