435
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The way teacher roles preferred by science teachers reflect on the lessons they teach in terms of their discourse: COVID-19 vaccine

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Alat, S. 2020. “An Investigation on the Effects of Using Socioscientific Issues as a Teaching Context on Classroom Discourse and Communicative Approaches in Science Classes.” Unpublished thesis, Marmara University.
  • Billings, L., and J. Fitzgerald. 2002. “Dialogic Discussion and the Paideia Seminar.” American Educational Research Journal 39 (4): 907–941. doi:10.3102/00028312039004905.
  • Bosser, U., and M. Lindahl. 2020. “Teachers’ Coordination of Dialogic and Authoritative Discourses Promoting Specific Goals in Socioscientific Issue-Based Teaching.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 19 (3): 461–482. doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10061-1.
  • Bryce, T., and D. Gray. 2004. “Tough Acts to Follow: The Challenges to Science Teachers Presented by Biotechnological Progress.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (6): 717–733. doi:10.1080/0950069032000138833.
  • Corden, R. 2009. Literacy and Learning through Talk. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Cotton, D. R. E. 2006. “Teaching Controversial Environmental Issues: Neutrality and Balance in the Reality of the Classroom.” Educational Research 48 (2): 223–241. doi:10.1080/00131880600732306.
  • Dawson, V. M. 2011. “A Case Study of the Impact of Introducing Socio-Scientific Issues into A Reproduction Unit in A Catholic Girls’ School.” In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom, edited by Troy. D. Sadler, (s313–345. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dawson, V. M., and G. Venville. 2010. “Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills about Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics.” Research in Science Education 40 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y.
  • Dori, Y. J., R.T. Tal, and M. Tsaushu. 2003. “Teaching Biotechnology through Case Studies-Can We Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills of Nonscience Majors?” Science Education 87 (6): 767–793. doi:10.1002/sce.10081.
  • Eastwood, J. L., T.D. Sadler, D.L. Zeidler, A. Lewis, L. Amiri, and S. Applebaum. 2012. “Contextualizing Nature of Science Instruction in Socioscientific Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (15): 2289–2315. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.667582.
  • Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A. 2020. “Fen Eğitiminde Sosyobilimsel Konu Olarak Covid 19 Pandemisi Ve Örnek Uygulama Önerileri” [Covid 19 Pandemic as a Socioscientific Issue in Science Education and Suggestions for Sample Applications].” Milli Eğitim 49 (1): 1121–1141. doi:10.37669/milliegitim.787170.
  • Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A., and F. Kaptan. 2017. “A Mixed Method Research Study on the Effectiveness of Socioscientific Issue-Based Instruction.” Education and Science 42 (192): 113–137. doi:10.15390/EB.2017.6600.
  • Fang, S.C., Y.S. Hsu, and S.S. Lin. 2019. “Conceptualizing Socioscientific Decision Making from a Review of Research in Science Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17 (3): 427–448. doi:10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2.
  • Frijters, S., G. Dam, and G. Rijlaarsdam. 2008. “Effects of Dialogic Learning on Value-Loaded Critical Thinking.” Learning and Instruction 18 (1): 66–82. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.001.
  • Gayford, C. 2002. “Controversial Environmental Issues: A Case Study for the Professional Development of Science Teachers.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (11): 1191–1200. doi:10.1080/09500690210134866.
  • Halliday, M. A. K, and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discourse Power. London: Falmer Press.
  • Hess, D. 2005. “How Do Teachers’ Political Views Influence Teaching about Controversial Issues.” Social Education 69 (1): 47–48.
  • Hofstein, A., I. Eilks, and R. Bybee. 2011. “Societal Issues and Their Importance for Contemporary Science Education - A Pedagogical Justification and the State-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (6): 1459–1483. doi:10.1007/S10763-010-9273-9.
  • Holbrook, J., and M. Rannikmae. 2007. “The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (11): 1347–1362. doi:10.1080/09500690601007549.
  • Kelly, T. E. 1986. “Discussing Controversial Issues: Four Perspectives on the Teacher’s Role.” Theory and Research in Social Education 14 (2): 113–138. doi:10.1080/00933104.1986.10505516.
  • Kılınç, A., U. Demiral, and T. Kartal. 2017a. “Resistance to Dialogic Discourse in SSI Teaching: The Effects of an Argumentation-Based Workshop, Teaching Practicum, and Induction on a Preservice Science Teacher.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (6): 764–789. doi:10.1002/tea.21385.
  • Kılınç, A., T. Kelly, B. Eroğlu, Ü. Demiral, T. Kartal, A. Sönmez, and M. Demirbağ. 2017b. “Stickers to Facts, Imposers, Democracy Advocators, and Committed Impartialists: Preservice Science Teachers’ Beliefs about Teacher’s Roles in Socioscientific Discourses.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (2): 195–213. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9682-x.
  • Kolarova, T., I. Hadjiali, and I. Denev. 2013. “High School Students‘ Reasoning in Making Decisions about Socio-Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering: Case of Gene Therapy.” Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 27 (2): 3737–3747. doi:10.5504/bbeq.2012.0133.
  • Kutnick, P., and J. Colwell. 2010. “Dialogue Enhancement in Classrooms. Towards a Relations Approach for Group Working.” In Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and C. Howe, 192–215. London: Routledge.
  • Lazarowitz, R., and I. Bloch. 2005. “Awareness of Societal Issues among High School Biology Teachers Teaching Genetics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (5–6): 437–457. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-0220-4.
  • Lee, H., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and K. Choi. 2006. “Korean Science Teachers’ Perceptions of the Introduction of Socio‐Scientific Issues into the Science Curriculum.” Canadian Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education 6 (2): 97–117. doi:10.1080/14926150609556691.
  • Lee, H., H. Chang, K. Choi, S. Kim, and D. Zeidler. 2012. “Developing Character and Values for Global Citizens: Analysis of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Moral Reasoning on Socio-Scientific Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (6): 925–953. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.625505.
  • Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwoord: Ablex.
  • Levinson, R. 2004. “Teaching Bioethics in Science: Crossing a Bridge Too Far?” Canadian Journal of Science. Mathematics and Technology Education 4 (3): 353–369. doi:10.1080/14926150409556619.
  • Levinson, R., and S. Turner. 2001. Valuable Lessons. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • Lyons, T. 2006. “Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ Experiences of School Science in Their Own Words.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621.
  • Martin, A. M., and B. Hand. 2009. “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Argument in the Elementary Science Classroom. A Longitudinal Case Study.” Research in Science Education 39 (1): 17–38. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9072-7.
  • McNeill, K.L., and D.S. Pimentel. 2010. “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban Classrooms: The Role of the Teacher in Engaging High School Students in Argumentation.” Science Education 94 (2): 203‐229. doi:10.1002/sce.20364.
  • Mercer, N., L. Dawes, and J.K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classrooms.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369. doi:10.1080/09500780902954273.
  • Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. UK, London: Routledge.
  • Miles, M, and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller-Lane, J., E. Denton, and A. May. 2006. “Social Studies Teachers’ Views on Committed Impartiality and Discussion.” Social Studies Research and Practice 1 (1): 30–44.
  • MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2013. Ilköğretim Kurumları (Ilkokullar Ve Ortaokullar) Fen Bilimleri Dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. [Foundational Education Institutions (Primary Schools and Middle Schools) Science (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Grades) Curriculum]. Ankara, Turkey: T.C Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2018. Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı (Ilkokul Ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve8. Sınıflar). [Foundational Education Institutions (Primary Schools and Middle Schools) Science (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Grades) Curriculum]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara: Turkey.
  • Mork, S. M. 2012. “Argumentation in Science Lessons: Focusing on the Teacher’s Role.” NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education 1 (1): 17–30. doi:10.5617/nordina.463.
  • Mortimer, E.F., and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Nurkka, N., J. Viiri, K. Littleton, and S. Lehesvuori. 2014. “A Methodological Approach to Exploring the Rhythm of Classroom Discourse in A Cumulative Frame in Science Teaching.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3 (1): 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.01.002.
  • Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, and C. Prendergast. 1997. Opening Dialogue. Understanding the Dynamizs of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York, London: Teachers College Press.
  • Ogborn, J., G. Kress, and I. Martins. 1996. Explaining Science in the Classroom. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Osborne, J., R. Duschl, and R. Fairbrother. 2002. Breaking THE Mould? Teaching Science for Public Understanding. London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Oulton, C., V. Day, J. Dillon, and M. Grace. 2004. “Controversial Issues ‐ Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices in the Context of Citizenship Education.” Oxford Review of Education 30 (4): 489–507. doi:10.1080/0305498042000303973.
  • Oulton, C., J. Dillon, and M. Grace. 2004. “Reconceptualizing the Teaching of Controversial Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (4): 411–423. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072746.
  • Pimentel, D.S., and K.L. McNeill. 2013. “Conducting Talk in Secondary Science Classrooms: Investigating Instruction Moves and Teachers’ Beliefs.” Science Education 97 (3): 367–394. doi:10.1002/sce.21061.
  • Presley, M. L., A.J. Sickel, N. Muslu, D. Merle-Johnson, S.B. Witzig, K. Izci, and T.D. Sadler. 2013. “A Framework for Socio-Scientific Issues Based Education.” Science Educator 22 (1): 26–32.
  • Puig, B., and M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2011. “Different Music to the Same Score: Teaching about Genes, Environment, and Human Performances.” In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research, edited by T. D. Sadler, 201–238. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Pun, J., and E. Macora. 2019. “The Effect of First and Second Language Use on Question Types in English Medium Instruction Science Classrooms in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368.
  • Ramli, M., and M.P. Yohana. 2018. “Classroom Interaction: Teacher and Students Perception on Dialogue in Primary Science Classroom.” Edusains 10 (1): 127–134. doi:10.15408/es.v10i1.8092.
  • Ratcliffe, M., and M. Grace. 2003. Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-scientific Issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Ratcliffe, M., and R. Millar. 2009. “Teaching for Understanding of Science in Context: Evidence from the Pilottrials of the “Twenty First Century Science” Courses.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 945–959. doi:10.1002/tea.20340.
  • Sadler, T. D. 2004. “Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009.
  • Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-Scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260802681839.
  • Sadler, T. D. 2011. “Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Education: What We Know about Science Education in the Context of SSI.” In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research, edited by T. D. Sadler, 355–369. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2004. “The Morality of Socio-Scientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas.” Science Education 88 (1): 4–27. doi:10.1002/sce.10101.
  • Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005a. “The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues.” Science Education 89 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1002/sce.20023.
  • Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005b. “Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17: 217–241. doi:10.1002/tea.20042.
  • Saunders, K.J, and L.J. Rennie. 2013. “A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into Socioscientific Issues in Science.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 253–274. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z.
  • Scott, P., J. Ametller, E. Mortimer, and J. Emberton. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Disciplinary Knowledge.” In Educational Dialogues. Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and Ch. Howe, 289–303. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Simonneaux, L. 2007. “Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview.” In Argumentation in Science Education, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre, 179–199. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Sinclair, J. M., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Sönmez, A. 2015. “Investigation of the Relationships between Science Teachers’ Epistemological Belief Systems and Their Teaching of Socioscientific Issues.” PhD diss., Abant İzzet Baysal University.
  • Tidemand, S., and J.A. Nielsen. 2017. “The Role of Socioscientific Issues in Biology Teaching: From the Perspective of Teachers.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (1): 44–61. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644.
  • Topçu, M. S. 2017. Socioscientific Issues and Teaching. 2nd Pres ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • van Zee, E. H., M. Iwasyk, A. Kurose, D. Simpson, and J. Wild. 2001. “Student and Teacher Questioning during Conversations about Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (2): 159–190. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J.
  • vanZee, E. H., and J. Minstrell. 1997. “Reflective Discourse: Developing Shared Understandings in a Physics Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 19 (2): 209–228. doi:10.1080/0950069970190206.
  • Venville, G. J., and V.M. Dawson. 2010. “The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (8): 952–977. doi:10.1002/tea.20358.
  • Watters, J.J., and C.M. Diezmann. 2016. “Engaging Elementary Students in Learning Science: An Analysis of Classroom Dialogue.” Instructional Science 44 (1): 25–44. doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9364-7.
  • Wells, G., and R.M. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3.
  • Yager, S.O., R.E. Yager, and G. Lim. 2006. “The Advantages of an STS Approach over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science.” School Science and Mathematics 106 (5): 248–260. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18083.x.
  • Yin, R.K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd Ed., 1st Ed., 1984; Rev. Ed., 1989). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Zeidler, D. L., and B.H. Nichols. 2009. “Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 21 (2): 49–58. doi:10.1007/BF03173684.
  • Zeidler, D. L., T.D. Sadler, S. Applebaum, and B.E. Callahan. 2009. “Advancing Reflective Judgment Through Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 74–101. doi:10.1002/Tea.20281.
  • Zeidler, D. L., T.D. Sadler, M.L. Simmons, and E.V. Howes. 2005. “Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science Education 89 (3): 357–377. doi:10.1002/Sce.20048.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.