564
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of the use of ICT in schools on students’ science higher-order thinking skills: comparative study of China and Finland

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aktamis, Hilal., and Nilgün. Yenice. 2010. “Determination of the Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Skill Levels.” In Innovation and Creativity in Education, edited by H. Uzunboylu, 3282–3288. Vol 2.
  • Arnone, M. P., R. V. Small, S. A. Chauncey, and H. P. McKenna. 2011. “Curiosity, Interest and Engagement in technology-pervasive Learning Environments: A New Research Agenda.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (2): 181–198. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9190-9.
  • Ausband, D. P. A. L. 2009. “Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills through WebQuests.” Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 26: 29–34.
  • Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report. European Schoolnet, 1, 1–71.
  • Boqing, Dong, and Peng Qiancheng. 2019. “Connotation and Realization Path of Scientific Thinking from the Perspective of Key Competency.” Curriculum, Teaching, Material and Method 4: 14.
  • Cantrill, J. G. 1998. “The Environmental Self and a Sense of Place: Communication Foundations for Regional Ecosystem Management.”
  • China National Education Plan (2010), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-07/30/content_11069957.htm
  • China’s Education Modernization 2035 plan. 2021. “The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council.” https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1626257458583903636&wfr=spider&for=pc
  • CINIC. 2019. “The 43rd China Statistical Report on Internet Development.” http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/t2019022870645:htm:
  • Cohen, M. A. 1988. “Some New Evidence on the Seriousness of Crime.” Criminology 26 (2): 343–353. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00845.x.
  • Chen Xiaoshan & Qi Wanxue.(2021).China Educational Research
  • Dalkey, N. C. 1969. “The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion.” RAND Corp Santa Monica Calif.
  • DeBoer, G. E. 2000. “Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 37 (6): 582–601. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L.
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, 2nd survey of schools : ICT in education : Finland country report, Publications Office, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/364303
  • Faragher, L., and H. Huijser. 2014. “Exploring Evidence of Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Writing of First Year Undergraduates.” The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 5 (2). doi:10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i2.230.
  • Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., G. Gimenez, and J. Calero. 2020. “Is the Use of ICT in Education Leading to Higher Student Outcomes?” Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education 157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969.
  • Finnish National Board of Education. 2014. “National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014.” Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Finnish Speaking Curriculum https://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf
  • Finnish National Board of Education. 2019. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Publications 5.
  • Freedman, D. A. 2009. Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hakkarainen, K., S. Järvelä, L. Lipponen, and E. Lehtinen. 1998. “Culture of Collaboration in computer-supported Learning: Finnish Perspectives.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9: 271–287.
  • Helfenstein, T.M.M.K.S. 2005. “Effective Use of ICT in Science Education.” The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership 20 (3): 1–13.
  • Heong Y.M., Othman, W.B., Yunos, J.B.M., Kiong, T.T., Hassan, R.B., Mohamad, M.M.B. 2011. “The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 1 (2): 121.
  • Heong, Y. M., Sern, L. C., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2016). The role of higher order thinking skills in green skill development. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 70, p. 05001). EDP Sciences.
  • Higgins, S. 2014. “Critical Thinking for 21 st-century Education: A cyber-tooth Curriculum?” Prospects 44 (4): 559–574. doi:10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0.
  • Hopson, M. H., R. L. Simms, and G. A. Knezek. 2001. “Using a technology-enriched Environment to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34 (2): 109–119. doi:10.1080/15391523.2001.10782338.
  • Huang, X. L. P. 2014. “Applying Information Technology to Promote Scientific Demonstration Teaching.” e-Education Research 7: 17–23. doi:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2014.07.002.
  • Kupiainen, R. 2020. “Digital Technologies and Online Learning in Primary Education (Finland).” Bloomsbury Education and Childhood Studies 1 (1) .
  • Lankinen, T. 2010, September. “Basic Education Reform in Finland–How to Develop the Top Ranked Education System.” In Presentation in Building Block of Education Whole System Reform Conference September, Finland, (pp. 13–14).
  • Lavonen, J., K. Juuti, M. Aksela, and V. Meisalo. 2006. “A Professional Development Project for Improving the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Science Teaching.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 15 (2): 159–174. doi:10.1080/14759390600769144.
  • Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V. 2004. “Computers and Advanced Technology in Education“ (Anaheim: Acta Press) 564–569 0-88986-422-5 IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, August 16-18, 2004, Kauai, Hawaii, USA.
  • Lavonen, J., and S. Laaksonen. 2009. “Context of Teaching and Learning School Science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 Results.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 922–944. doi:10.1002/tea.20339.
  • Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944.
  • Lawrence, K. S. 2012. “United Nations Environment Programme.” The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization.
  • Lehtinen, M.S.a.E. 1999. “The Challenges of ICT in Finnish Education.” Finland.
  • Lei, J., and Y. Zhao. 2007. “Technology Uses and Student Achievement: A Longitudinal Study.” Computers & Education 49 (2): 284–296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013.
  • Letchumanan, M., S. K. S. Husain, K. T. Chau, and A. F. M. Ayub 2020. “Investigating the Use of ICT Tools by Academicians to Promote Higher Order Thinking Skills among University Students.” Proceedings of the 27th National Symposium on Mathematical Sciences (Sksm27).
  • Lin Chongde. 2016. “Student Development Core Literacy: What Kind of Person Should We Cultivate for the Future?” Journal of the Chinese Society of Education 6: 1–2.
  • Maaranen, K., and H. Kynäslahti. 2021. “‘It Sounded like Fun, that We Would Get to Go to the University’. Pupils Teaching ICT to Peers: A Case Study of Finnish Media Agents.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 1–13. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2021.1876756.
  • Marzano, R. J. 1993. “How Classroom Teachers Approach the Teaching of Thinking.” Theory into Practice 32 (3): 154–160. doi:10.1080/00405849309543591.
  • Marzano, Robert. J. , Kendall, John. S. , and , Eds. 2006. The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousands Oaks, California 91320: Corwin Press.
  • Marzano, Robert. J., and John. S. Kendall. 2006. The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousands Oaks, california 01320: Corwin Press.
  • Marzano, R. J, Pickering, D., Arredondo, D.E., Blackburn, G.J., Brandt, R.S., Moffett, C.A. 1992. Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria,VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Ncrel, N., and G. Metiri. 2003. “enGauge 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Learners: Literacy in the Digital Age.” Naperville, Illinois 85.
  • Odell, B., A. M. Galovan, and M. Cutumisu. 2020. “The Relation between ICT and Science in PISA 2015 for Bulgarian and Finnish Students.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16 (6): em1846.
  • OECD. 2017. “PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving.” PISA. doi:10.1787/9789264281820-en.
  • Qureshi, M. A., A. Khaskheli, J. A. Qureshi, S. A. Raza, and S. Q. Yousufi. 2021. “Factors Affecting Students’ Learning Performance through Collaborative Learning and Engagement.” Interactive Learning Environments 1–21. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886.
  • Rajendran, P., G. Ekambaram, and D. Sakthisekaran. 2008. “Effect of Mangiferin on Benzo (A) Pyrene Induced Lung Carcinogenesis in Experimental Swiss Albino Mice.” Natural Product Research 22 (8): 672–680. doi:10.1080/14786410701824973.
  • Remillard, J. T., H. Van Steenbrugge, R. Machalow, T. Koljonen, H. Krzywacki, L. Condon, and K. Hemmi. 2021. “Elementary Teachers’ Reflections on Their Use of Digital Instructional Resources in Four Educational Contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and US.” ZDM–Mathematics Education 53 (6): 1331–1345. doi:10.1007/s11858-021-01295-6.
  • Resnick, L. B., & Science National Research Council (US). Committee on Research in Mathematics. 1987. “Education and Learning to Think.”
  • Roberts, D.A. 2007. “Scientific literacy/science Literacy.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S.K. Abell and N.G. Lederman, 729–780. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roberts, D. A., and R. W. Bybee. 2014. “Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education.” Handbook of Research on Science Education 2: 545–558.
  • Ruixue, Liu, and Ren Youqun. 2019. “Research on Effects of Flow Experience and Empathy in Immersive Virtual Environment.” E-education Research 4: 13.
  • Saarinen, A. I. L. L., Jari Lipsanen, Mirka Hintsanen, M. Huotilainen, Keltikangas-Järvinen, and L. Keltikangas-Järvinen. 2021. “The Use of Digital Technologies at School and Cognitive Learning Outcomes: A Population-Based Study in Finland.” International Journal of Educational Psychology 10 (1): 1. doi:10.17583/ijep.2021.4667.
  • Sabu, N. 2020. “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Interactive Multimedia Learning Environment.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10 (3). doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i3/7081.
  • Shukla, D, Dungsungnoen, A.P. 2016. “Student’s Perceived Level and Teachers’ Teaching Strategies of Higher Order Thinking Skills; A Study on Higher Educational Institutions in Thailand.” Journal of Education and Practice 7(1)2 211–219 .
  • Sinko, M., and E. Lehtinen. 1999. The Challenges of ICT. PS-viestintä Oy P.O. Box 303 FIN-40101 Jyväskylä: Atena.
  • Sumarwati, S., H. Fitriyani, F. M. A. Setiaji, M. H. Amiruddin, and S. A. Jalil. 2020. “Developing Mathematics Learning Media Based on E-Learning Using Moodle on Geometry Subject to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (Ijim) 14 (4): 182–191. doi:10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12731.
  • Sun, L., K. D. Bradley, and K. Akers. 2012. “A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating Factors Impacting Science Achievement for Secondary School Students: PISA Hong Kong Sample.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (14): 2107–2125. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708063.
  • Sun, H., Y. Xie, and J. Lavonen. 2022. “Exploring the Structure of Students’ Scientific Higher Order Thinking in Science Education.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 43: 100999. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999.
  • Toledo, S., and J. M. Dubas. 2015. “Encouraging Higher-Order Thinking in General Chemistry by Scaffolding Student Learning Using Marzano’s Taxonomy.” Journal of Chemical Education 93 (1): 64–69. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184.
  • Xie Yueguanga, Y. X. 2017. “Explanation and Instruction Suggestions for Senior High Information Technology Curriculum Information Consciousness Literacy.” Curriculum, Teaching Material And Method 37: 85–90. doi:10.19877/j.cnki.kcjcjf.2017.12.014.
  • Yan, Wang. 2016. “Why Is Science Education Successful in Finland?” People’s Education 2: 72–76.
  • Youqun, R. 2018. “Stepping into the New Age of Chinese Education Informatization: Interpretation of Education Informatization 2.0 Action Plan(1).” China Educational Technology 27–28. doi:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2018.06.004.
  • Yuanxiang, Guo. 2009. “The Nature and Structure of Knowledge and Deep Teaching.” Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method 11: 80.
  • Yulian, Jiang. 2017. “Constructing Model for Development of Higher Order Thinking in Technology Rich Classroom Environment.” Doctoral Dissertation. Northeast Normal University.
  • Zachariades, T., C. Christou, and D. Pitta-Pantazi. 2013. “Reflective, Systemic and Analytic Thinking in Real Numbers.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 82 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9413-y.
  • Zongkai, Yang, Wu Di, and Zheng Xudong. 2018. “ICT in Education 2.0:Key Historical Transition of ICT in Education in the New Era.” Educational Research 39 (4): 16–22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.