Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 43, 2024 - Issue 3
327
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impacts of donors’ perceived personal resource scarcity on their intentions to volunteer for low- and high-responsibility recipients: the mediating role of perceived social worth

Pages 465-490 | Received 22 Sep 2021, Accepted 03 Apr 2023, Published online: 12 Apr 2023

References

  • Aarøe, L., and M.B. Petersen. 2013. Hunger games: Fluctuations in blood glucose levels influence support for social welfare. Psychological Science 24, no. 12: 2550–6.
  • Appelbaum, L.D. 2002. Who deserves help? Students’ opinions about the deservingness of different groups living in Germany to receive aid. Social Justice Research 15, no. 3: 201–25.
  • Azmi, A., Y.D. Ang, and S.A. Talib. 2016. Trust and justice in the adoption of a welfare e-payment system. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 10, no. 3: 391–410.
  • Bacq, S., and E. Alt. 2018. Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing 33, no. 3: 333–50.
  • Bakan, D. 1966. The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Baumeister, R.F., and M.R. Leary. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117, no. 3: 497–529.
  • Betancourt, H. 1990. An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16, no. 3: 573–91.
  • Böhnke, P. 2010. Implications of the activation paradigm on poverty and social exclusion in Germany: Facts, hypotheses, uncertainties. German Policy Studies 6, no. 1: 185–209.
  • Briers, B., and S. Laporte. 2013. A wallet full of calories: The effect of financial dissatisfaction on the desire for food energy. Journal of Marketing Research 50, no. 6: 767–81.
  • Brunswick, E. 1947. Systematic and representative design of psychological experiments, with results in physical and social perception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S.D. Gosling. 2011. Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 6, no. 1: 3–5.
  • Byrne, N., O. McCarthy, and M. Ward. 2007. Money-lending and financial exclusion. Public Money and Management 27, no. 1: 45–52.
  • Callander, E.J., and D.J. Schofield. 2016. The impact of poverty on self-efficacy: An Australian longitudinal study. Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England) 66, no. 4: 320–5.
  • Cannon, C., K. Goldsmith, and C. Roux. 2019. A self‐regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology 29, no. 1: 104–27.
  • Capra, C.M., B. Jiang, and Y. Su. 2021. Altruistic self-concept mediates the effects of personality traits on volunteering: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 92: 101697.
  • Chang, C.T. 2012. Are guilt appeals a panacea in green advertising? The right formula of issue proximity and environmental consciousness. International Journal of Advertising 31, no. 4: 741–71.
  • Charities Aid Foundation. 2022. CAF World Giving Index 2022. Charities Aid Foundation. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/caf_world_giving_index_2022_210922-final.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023).
  • Chullen, C.L., and W.J. Rowe. 2018. The perceived fairness of human resource practices. American Journal of Management 18, no. 1: 100–7.
  • Costello, J.P., and S.A. Malkoc. 2022. Why are donors more generous with time than money? The role of perceived control over donations on charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research 49, no. 4: 678–96.
  • Craig-Lees, M., J. Harris, and W. Lau. 2008. The role of dispositional, organizational and situational variables in volunteering. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 19, no. 2: 1–24.
  • Darley, J.M., and C.D. Batson. 1973. From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27, no. 1: 100–8.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
  • Dweck, C.S., C.Y. Chiu, and Y.Y. Hong. 1995. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry 6, no. 4: 267–85.
  • Fan, L., X. Li, and Y. Jiang. 2019. Room for opportunity: Resource scarcity increases attractiveness of range marketing offers. Journal of Consumer Research 46, no. 1: 82–98.
  • Feather, N.T. 1996. Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, no. 3: 571–87.
  • Feather, N.T. 1999. Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 3, no. 2: 86–107.
  • Finkelstein, M.A. 2008. Volunteer satisfaction and volunteer action: A functional approach. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 36, no. 1: 9–18.
  • Fisher, J.D., A. Nadler, and S. Whitcher-Alagna. 1982. Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin 91, no. 1: 27–54.
  • Fisher, R.J., and D. Ackerman. 1998. The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: A social norm perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 25, no. 3: 262–75.
  • Goh, I.K., R. Pappu, and P.M. Chien. 2021. Investigating the impact of perceived nonprofit sponsorship engagement on prosocial behavior. Journal of Business Research 126: 113–25.
  • Goldsmith, K., C. Roux, and A.V. Wilson. 2020. Can thoughts of having less ever promote prosocial preferences? The relationship between scarcity, construal level, and sustainable product adoption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5, no. 1: 70–82.
  • Gong, X., H. Zhang, and Y. Fan. 2021. To conform or deviate? The effect of resource scarcity on consumer preference for minority-endorsed options. Journal of Business Research 122: 437–46.
  • Goodman, J.K., C.E. Cryder, and A. Cheema. 2013. Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26, no. 3: 213–24.
  • Grant, A.M., and F. Gino. 2010. A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98, no. 6: 946–55.
  • Grant, A.M. 2008. The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. The Journal of Applied Psychology 93, no. 1: 108–24.
  • Griskevicius, V., J.M. Ackerman, S.M. Cantú, A.W. Delton, T.E. Robertson, J.A. Simpson, M.E. Thompson, and J.M. Tybur. 2013. When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science 24, no. 2: 197–205.
  • Guo, Y., Q. Guo, Z. Liu, and H. Liu. 2022. Moral identity and empathy promote prosocial behavior only toward blameless AIDS patients. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 63, no. 3: 229–37.
  • Hardy, C.L., and M. Van Vugt. 2006. Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 32, no. 10: 1402–13.
  • Harikrishnan, P.K., P.P. Dewani, and A. Behl. 2022. Scarcity promotions and consumer aggressions: A theoretical framework. Journal of Global Marketing 35, no. 4: 306–23.
  • Hauser, D.J., and N. Schwarz. 2016. Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject Pool participants. Behavior Research Methods 48, no. 1: 400–7.
  • Hayes, A.F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  • Henry, P.J., C. Reyna, and B. Weiner. 2004. Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, no. 1: 34–58.
  • Herzenstein, M., and S.S. Posavac. 2019. When charity begins at home: How personal financial scarcity drives preference for donating locally at the expense of global concerns. Journal of Economic Psychology 73: 123–35.
  • Hill, R.P., K.D. Martin, and L.N. Chaplin. 2012. A tale of two marketplaces: Consumption restriction, social comparison, and life satisfaction. Marketing Letters 23, no. 3: 731–44.
  • Holland, J., A.S. Silva, and R. Mace. 2012. Lost letter measure of variation in altruistic behaviour in 20 neighbourhoods. PloS One 7, no. 8: e43294.
  • Hsieh, M.H., and O. Yucel-Aybat. 2018. Persuasive charity appeals for less and more controllable health causes: The roles of implicit mindsets and benefit frames. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 2: 112–26.
  • Huang, S.L., and H.H. Ku. 2016. Brand image management for nonprofit organizations: Exploring the relationships between websites, brand images and donations. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 17, no. 1: 80–96.
  • Huppert, E., A. Shaw, and J. Decety. 2020. The effect of hunger on children’s sharing behavior and fairness preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 192: 104786.
  • Inesi, M.E., S. Botti, D. Dubois, D.D. Rucker, and A.D. Galinsky. 2011. Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science 22, no. 8: 1042–8.
  • Jeong, H.J. 2020. The roles of self-identity cues and public self-consciousness in volunteering for socially stigmatized causes on social media. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 32, no. 1: 47–72.
  • Jiang, Y., Z. Chen, and R.S. Wyer. Jr. 2014. Impact of money on emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55: 228–33.
  • Jin, F., Z. Zheng, and B. Wu. 2021. God helps those who help themselves: How recipients’ efforts perception affects donation. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–8.
  • Kaplan, S., and R. Kaplan. 2003. Health, supportive environments, and the reasonable person model. American Journal of Public Health 93, no. 9: 1484–9.
  • Karasawa, K. 1991. The effects of onset and offset responsibility on affects and helping judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, no. 6: 482–99.
  • Keltner, D., D.H. Gruenfeld, and C. Anderson. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 110, no. 2: 265–84.
  • Keyes, C.L .M. 1998. Social wellbeing. Social Psychology Quarterly 61, no. 2: 121–40.
  • Kim, N. 2014. Advertising strategies for charities: Promoting consumers’ donation of time versus money. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 707–24.
  • Kogut, T. 2011. Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, no. 4: 748–55.
  • Kraus, M.W., P.K. Piff, R. Mendoza-Denton, M.L. Rheinschmidt, and D. Keltner. 2012. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review 119, no. 3: 546–72.
  • Lee, J., and L.J. Shrum. 2012. Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research 39, no. 3: 530–44.
  • Lee, S., K.P. Winterich, and W.T. Ross. Jr. 2014. I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research 41, no. 3: 678–96.
  • Lee, Y., J.Y. Seo, and S. Yoon. 2020. Charity advertising: Congruence between political orientation and cause of need. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 7: 943–62.
  • Lindenmeier, J. 2008. Promoting volunteerism: Effects of self-efficacy, advertisement-induced emotional arousal, perceived costs of volunteering, and message framing. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 19, no. 1: 43–65.
  • Liu, W., and J. Aaker. 2008. The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research 35, no. 3: 543–57.
  • MacDonnell, R., and K. White. 2015. How construals of money versus time impact consumer charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research 42, no. 4: ucv042.
  • Maki, A., P.C. Dwyer, and M. Snyder. 2016. Time perspective and volunteerism: The importance of focusing on the future. The Journal of Social Psychology 156, no. 3: 334–49.
  • Mani, A., S. Mullainathan, E. Shafir, and J. Zhao. 2013. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science (New York, N.Y.) 341, no. 6149: 976–80.
  • Mattila, A.S., L. Wu, and C. Choi. 2016. Powerful or powerless customers: The influence of gratitude on engagement with CSR. Journal of Services Marketing 30, no. 5: 519–28.
  • Mehta, R., and M. Zhu. 2016. Creating when you have less: The impact of resource scarcity on product use creativity. Journal of Consumer Research 42, no. 5: 767–82.
  • Miller, J.G., and D.M. Bersoff. 1992. Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, no. 4: 541–54.
  • Miller, S.L., J.K. Maner, and D.V. Becker. 2010. Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99, no. 1: 62–77.
  • Mukherjee, A., S.Y. Lee, and T. Burnham. 2020. The effect of others’ participation on charitable behavior: Moderating role of recipient resource scarcity. Journal of Business Research 120: 213–28.
  • Oppenheimer, D.M., T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, no. 4: 867–72.
  • Petersen, M.B., L. Aarøe, N.H. Jensen, and O. Curry. 2014. Social welfare and the psychology of food sharing: Short‐term hunger increases support for social welfare. Political Psychology 35, no. 6: 757–73.
  • Piff, P.K., M.W. Kraus, S. Côté, B.H. Cheng, and D. Keltner. 2010. Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99, no. 5: 771–84.
  • Pitesa, M., and S. Thau. 2018. Resource scarcity, effort, and performance in physically demanding jobs: An evolutionary explanation. The Journal of Applied Psychology 103, no. 3: 237–48.
  • Preacher, K.J., and A.F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40, no. 3: 879–91.
  • Reed, I.I., A. Kay, S. Finnel, K. Aquino, and E. Levy. 2016. I don’t want the money, I just want your time: How moral identity overcomes the aversion to giving time to prosocial causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110, no. 3: 435–57.
  • Reyna, C., P.J. Henry, W. Korfmacher, and A. Tucker. 2006. Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, no. 1: 109–28.
  • Roux, C., K. Goldsmith, and A. Bonezzi. 2015. On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 42, no. 4: ucv048.
  • Sasson, C., D.J. Magid, P. Chan, E.D. Root, B.F. McNally, A.L. Kellermann, and J.S. Haukoos. 2012. Association of neighborhood characteristics with bystander-initiated CPR. The New England Journal of Medicine 367, no. 17: 1607–15.
  • Schlosser, A.E., and E. Levy. 2016. Helping others or oneself: How direction of comparison affects prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 26, no. 4: 461–73.
  • Septianto, F., B. Sung, Y. Seo, and N. Tugiman. 2018. Proud volunteers: The role of self-and vicarious-pride in promoting volunteering. Marketing Letters 29, no. 4: 501–19.
  • Shah, A.K., S. Mullainathan, and E. Shafir. 2012. Some consequences of having too little. Science (New York, N.Y.) 338, no. 6107: 682–5.
  • Sharma, E., and A.L. Alter. 2012. Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research 39, no. 3: 545–60.
  • Sharma, E., N. Mazar, A.L. Alter, and D. Ariely. 2014. Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 123, no. 2: 90–100.
  • Shrout, P.E., and N. Bolger. 2002. Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 7, no. 4: 422–45.
  • Sim, J., and C. Wright. 2000. Research in health care: Concepts, designs and methods. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes Ltd.
  • Snyder, M., and A.M. Omoto. 2008. Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review 2, no. 1: 1–36.
  • Tang, H., L. Li, and S. Su. 2022. Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage. Journal of Business Research 149: 139–48.
  • Tezer, A., and H.O. Bodur. 2020. The green consumption effect: How using green products improves consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research 47, no. 1: 25–39.
  • Tong, Z., F. Ma, H. Xiao, P. Haan, and W. Feng. 2022. How scarcity influences home country consumers’ attitudes toward the firm engaging in cross-border philanthropy? The role of perceived distributive justice. International Marketing Review 39, no. 4: 852–88.
  • Wang, L., X. Su, and Y. You. 2021. Purchasing luck: The impact of scarcity cues on superstitious behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 20, no. 3: 577–89.
  • Wang, L., Y. You, C, and M. Yang. 2020. Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing 37, no. 3: 557–71.
  • Wegner, D.M., and T. Giuliano. 1980. Arousal-induced attention to self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, no. 5: 719–26.
  • Weiner, B., D. Osborne, and U. Rudolph. 2011. An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 15, no. 2: 199–213.
  • Weiner, B., R.P. Perry, and J. Magnusson. 1988. An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55, no. 5: 738–48.
  • Weltzien, S., L.E. Marsh, and B. Hood. 2018. Thinking of me: Self-focus reduces sharing and helping in seven- to eight-year-olds. PloS One 13, no. 1: e0189752.
  • White, K., R. MacDonnell, and J.H. Ellard. 2012. Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing 76, no. 1: 103–18.
  • Willems, J., and S. Dury. 2017. Reasons for not volunteering: Overcoming boundaries to attract volunteers. The Service Industries Journal 37, no. 11–12: 726–45.
  • Winterich, K.P., and Y. Zhang. 2014. Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 41, no. 2: 274–93.
  • Wrzesniewski, A., J.E. Dutton, and G. Debebe. 2003. Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior 25: 93–135.
  • Yang, H., and K. Zhang. 2022. How resource scarcity influences the preference for counterhedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 48, no. 5: 904–19.
  • Zagefka, H., M. Noor, R. Brown, G.R. De Moura, and T. Hopthrow. 2011. Donating to disaster survivors: Responses to natural and humanly caused events. European Journal of Social Psychology 41, no. 3: 353–63.
  • Zhao, X., J.G. Lynch, Jr, and Q. Chen. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37, no. 2: 197–206.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.